Literature DB >> 28232054

Why do caterpillars whistle at birds? Insect defence sounds startle avian predators.

Amanda L Dookie1, Courtney A Young2, Gilles Lamothe3, Laura A Schoenle4, Jayne E Yack5.   

Abstract

Many insects produce sounds when attacked by a predator, yet the functions of these signals are poorly understood. It is debated whether such sounds function as startle, warning or alarm signals, or merely serve to augment other defences. Direct evidence is limited owing to difficulties in disentangling the effects of sounds from other defences that often occur simultaneously in live insects. We conducted an experiment to test whether an insect sound can function as a deimatic (i.e. startle) display. Variations of a whistle of the walnut sphinx caterpillar (Amorpha juglandis) were presented to a predator, red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus), when birds activated a sensor while feeding on mealworms (Tenebrio molitor). Birds exposed to whistles played back at natural sound levels exhibited significantly higher startle scores (by flying away, flinching, and hopping) and took longer to return to the feeding dish than during control conditions where no sounds were played. Birds habituated to sounds during a one-hour session, but after two days the startling effects were restored. Our results provide empirical evidence that an insect sound alone can function as a deimatic display against an avian predator. We discuss how whistles might be particularly effective 'acoustic eye spots' on avian predators.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic; Avian; Caterpillar; Defence; Deimatic display; Insect; Startle

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28232054     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  3 in total

1.  The protective value of a defensive display varies with the experience of wild predators.

Authors:  Kate D L Umbers; Thomas E White; Sebastiano De Bona; Tonya Haff; Julia Ryeland; Eleanor Drinkwater; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Hissing of geese: caller identity encoded in a non-vocal acoustic signal.

Authors:  Richard Policht; Artur Kowalczyk; Ewa Łukaszewicz; Vlastimil Hart
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Testing the feasibility of the startle-first route to deimatism.

Authors:  Grace G Holmes; Emeline Delferrière; Candy Rowe; Jolyon Troscianko; John Skelhorn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.