| Literature DB >> 28231218 |
Fernanda Zaccari1, Giovanni Galietta2.
Abstract
Winter squash "type butternut" is harvested in physiological ripening for better commercial distribution, when sensory and/or nutritional quality is not optimum for consumption. The objective of this study was to quantify the content of α-carotene, β-carotene, color and dry matter in the pulp of raw and microwave-cooked winter squash "type butternut" (variety CosmoF1) in three states of commercial maturity. Immature, mature, and very mature fruit, defined at the time of the harvest by the percentage of orange peel and green stalk, were evaluated. The highest concentration of carotenes (α-carotene + β-carotene) in mg.100 g-1 pulp wet basis was found in very mature fruits (31.96 mg), followed by mature fruits (24.65 mg), and immature fruits (18.82 mg). Microwave cooking caused the loss of β-carotene (28.6% wet basis) and α-carotene (34.1%). Cooking promote a greater reduction of α-carotene in immature (40.3%) and mature (34.5%) fruits. The ratio of β-carotene and α-carotene content increased with commercial maturity from 0.93 for immature fruits to 1.0 for very mature fruit, with higher ratio in cooked pulp (1.04) vs. raw pulp (0.96).Entities:
Keywords: Cucurbita moschata; carotenes; color; cooked pulp; ripening
Year: 2015 PMID: 28231218 PMCID: PMC5224544 DOI: 10.3390/foods4030477
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Stages of commercial maturity of the fruits. (A): immature; (B): mature; (C): very mature.
Total content of β-carotene and α-carotene (mg.100 g−1 wet basis) in raw and cooked pulp from winter squash at three stages of maturity.
| Raw | Cooked | Raw | Cooked | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Immature | 9.54 ± 0.61 bA | 6.35 ± 0.62 bB | 9.28 ± 0.31 bA | 5.55 ± 0.54 bB |
| Mature | 12.34 ± 0.47 abA | 9.37 ± 0.91 abA | 14.31 ± 0.67 abA | 9.37 ± 0.65 bB |
| Very Mature | 15.77 ± 1.61 aA | 11.08 ± 0.83 aA | 16.19 ± 1.79 aA | 11.31 ± 0.89 aA |
| Stage of Maturity (SM) | 0.0016 | 0.0007 | ||
| Preparation (P) | 0.0016 | 0.0004 | ||
| SM x P | 0.6458 | 0.8421 | ||
Mean ± SEM (n = 3). For β-carotene or α-carotene, lowercase letters in a column indicate differences between stages of maturity within the same form of preparation (Tukey ≤ 0.05). Uppercase letters in a row indicate differences between the ways of preparation for the same stage of mature (Student t ≤ 0.05).
Lightness (L*), Chroma (C*) and Hue angle (h) color of raw and cooked pulp from squash at three stages of maturity.
| Immature | Mature | Very Mature | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 69.4 ± 0.3 aA | 68.5 ± 0.4 aA | 65.8 ± 0.5 bA |
| Cooked | 57.5 ± 1.5 aB | 62.7 ± 1.6 aB | 51.6 ± 1.5 bB |
| Raw | 67.1 ± 0.6 aA | 66.1 ± 0.3 aA | 61.3 ± 0.6 bA |
| Cooked | 73.2 ± 1.0 aB | 67.8 ± 0.8 bA | 65.2 ± 1.2 bB |
| Raw | 62.3 ± 0.3 bA | 63.9 ± 1.4 bA | 67.4 ± 0.8 aA |
| Cooked | 50.7 ± 1.9 bB | 59.8 ± 2.0 aA | 49.5 ± 1.8 bB |
Mean ± SEM (n = 12). For each color variable, same lowercase letters for the same row (Tukey p ≥0.05) and uppercase letters for the same column (t-Student p ≥ 0.05), indicate no statistical difference.
Dry matter content (%) of raw and cooked winter squash pulp in three stages of maturity.
| Dry matter content (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Immature | Mature | Very Mature | ||
| Raw | 8.75 ± 0.75 | 8.28 ± 0.29 | 8.60 ± 0.59 | 0.8403 |
| Cooked | 9.26 ± 0.53 | 8.83 ± 0.17 | 8.04 ± 0.14 | 0.1426 |
| 0.6779 | 0.2182 | 0.2131 | ||
| Maturity stage (MS) | 0.3911 | |||
| Preparation (P) | 0.6874 | |||
| MS × P | 0.6458 | |||
Mean ± SEM (n = 6).
Figure 2Relationship between β-carotene and α-carotene content, in every state of fruit maturity and preparation. Mean ± SEM (n = 3). Different letters in the column indicate that the treatments are statistically different. Main effects: state of maturity (SM) < 0.0001; Preparation (p) < 0.0001; SM × p = 0.0044.
Figure 3α-carotene and β-carotene reduction for cooking from winter squash pulp in three states of fruit maturity. Mean ± SEM (n = 3). For α-carotene or β-carotene, different lowercase letters indicates differences between states of maturity (Tukey, p ≤ 0.05). Different capital letters indicate differences between carotenoids to the same state of maturity (t-Student p ≤ 0.05).