| Literature DB >> 28231148 |
Zubaidah Irawati Koenari1, Carmen M Siagian2, Bona Simanungkalit3, Asti Nilatany4, Indra Mustika Pratama5, Deudeu Lasmawati6, Cecep M Nurcahya7.
Abstract
The safety and high quality of ethnic ready-to-eat foods as a source of nourishment and food supplies chain to the remote areas become particularly important. Consuming healthy and balanced nutritional foods means eating better quality foods in proper quantities. Such foods can be developed through a preservation technique by using ionizing radiation. Although implementation of the technology for certain foodstuffs has been implemented in some countries, application of the process to a complete set of meals for selected target groups is still very limited. The various recipes of ready-to-eat food rations based on soy bean, fish, red meat, and poultry, were first developed in collaboration with medium-sized food enterprises prior to quality assessments. The products were individually packed and sealed either in a laminate pouch of Nylon-PE or polyester-aluminum foil-LLDPE and exposed to ionizing radiation at 8 kGy or 45 kGy, respectively, under cryogenic conditions throughout the process, to protect the essential dietary nutrients against free radical attack, and to reduce the undesirable chemical migration from packing material to the food and oxidative changes within the food matrix containing fats. The irradiated foods were stored at room temperature without impairing the overall quality. The high quality of irradiated ethnic foods, i.e., bacem tofu, pepes gold fish, rendang beef, semur beef, and semur chicken, have been administered through an intervention study on adult groups as landslide victims in Cikadu, Pemalang for 30 days continuously at breakfast time: 7.00-9.00 A.M. The results showed that body mass index (BMI) (kg/m²), skin fold caliper (SFC) (mm), hemoglobin (g/dL), and total lymphocyte counts (%) of the targeted respondents did not tend to increase (at p ≥ 0.05) after consuming the irradiated foods, while the albumin content (g/dL) showed a significant increase in blood serum (at p ≤ 0.05). Sensory attributes, such as general appearance, texture, color, taste, and odor of such foods showed good evaluation by the respondents in order to collect more information regarding local culture and eating habits, as well as the general opinion about the irradiated foods. The irradiated ethnic ready-to-eat foods were generally well accepted by the respondents, though the cost-benefit of mass production were still of great concern.Entities:
Keywords: cost benefits; ethnic ready to eat foods; ionizing radiation; landslide victims; nutritional status
Year: 2016 PMID: 28231148 PMCID: PMC5302407 DOI: 10.3390/foods5030053
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Flowchart of pre and post tests during intervention activities at Cikadu camp.
Cyclus of 5 day menu for 30 days duration of intervention studies on ethnic ready to eat foods for respondents in Cikadu camp. The type of menus were repeated and administered to the targeted respondents on 5 day basis.
| Day | Menu |
|---|---|
| 1st | Rice and |
Results of anthropometry and blood test of respondents before (pre-test) and after intervention ethnic ready-to-eat foods (post-test) of three groups.
| Parameter | Group I * | Group II ** | Group III *** |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMI (kg/m2) pre test | 23.22 ± 3.82 | 23.13 ± 3.94 | 23.03 ± 4.39 |
| BMI (kg/m2) post test | 23.33 ± 3.90 | 23.03 ± 3.88 | 22.96 ± 4.36 |
| Biceps (mm) pre test | 1.86 ± 0.58 | 2.37 ± 0.82 | 2.73 ± 1.20 |
| Biceps (mm) post test | 3.94 ± 1.71 | 3.59 ± 1.38 | 4.04 ± 2.18 |
| Albumin (g/dL) pre test | 4.26 ± 0.32 | 4.43 ± 0.30 | 4.37 ± 0.23 |
| Albumin (g/dL) post test | 4.23 ± 0.32 | 4.26 ± 0.32 | 4.45 ± 0.32 |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) pre test | 13.66 ± 1.82 | 14.03 ± 2.22 | 14.38 ± 1.25 |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) post test | 13.35 ± 1.88 | 13.67 ± 2.08 | 14.14 ± 1.33 |
| Total lymphocyte counts (%) pre test | 34.00 ± 6.96 | 33.50 ± 7.5 | 33.58 ± 7.29 |
| Total lymphocyte counts (%) post test | 34.40 ± 7.89 | 34.01 ± 8.00 | 32.83 ± 8.40 |
Note: * respondents consumed non-irradiated, ethnic ready-to-eat foods; ** respondents consumed ordinary foods (control); *** respondents consumed irradiated, ethnic ready-to-eat foods.
Figure 2Sensory evaluation of non-irradiated and irradiated bacem tofu.
Figure 3Sensory evaluation of non-irradiated and irradiated pepes gold fish.
Figure 4Sensory evaluation of non-irradiated and irradiated rendang beef.
Figure 5Sensory evaluation of non-irradiated and irradiated semur beef.
Figure 6Sensory evaluation of non-irradiated and irradiated semur chicken.