| Literature DB >> 28231133 |
Mauro Marengo1, Hannah F Akoto2, Miriam Zanoletti3, Aristodemo Carpen4, Simona Buratti5, Simona Benedetti6, Alberto Barbiroli7, Paa-Nii T Johnson8, Esther O Sakyi-Dawson9, Firibu K Saalia10, Francesco Bonomi11, Maria Ambrogina Pagani12, John Manful13, Stefania Iametti14.
Abstract
Snacks were produced by extruding blends of partially-defatted soybean flour with flours from milled or parboiled African-grown rice. The interplay between composition and processing in producing snacks with a satisfactory sensory profile was addressed by e-sensing, and by molecular and rheological approaches. Soybean proteins play a main role in defining the properties of the protein network in the products. At the same content in soybean flour, use of parboiled rice flour increases the snack's hardness. Electronic nose and electronic tongue discriminated samples containing a higher amount of soybean flour from those with a lower soybean flour content.Entities:
Keywords: e-nose; e-tongue; extrudates; rice; soybean enriched snacks
Year: 2016 PMID: 28231133 PMCID: PMC5302339 DOI: 10.3390/foods5020038
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Physical characteristics of extruded snacks.
| Sample | Color | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L* | a* | b* | Hardness, | Expansion Ratio | |
| U-10 | 87.37 ± 0.51 a | −0.63 ± 0.06 a | 15.14 ± 0.24 a | 3.8 ± 0.74 a | 3.6 ± 0.14 a |
| U-25 | 84.10 ± 0.21 b | 0.11 ± 0.02 b | 19.72 ± 0.29 b | 5.9 ± 0.83 b | 3.3 ± 0.24 b |
| P-10 | 82.61 ± 0.56 c | 0.31 ± 0.06 c | 19.31 ± 0.35 b | 5.9 ± 0.62 b | 3.1 ± 0.34 b |
| P-25 | 81.74 ± 0.92 d | 0.62 ± 0.11 d | 21.25 ± 0.63 c | 8.8 ± 0.92 c | 2.4 ± 0.44 c |
Values are means ± standard deviations (n = 20 for physical measurements, n = 16 for color measurements). Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05). Samples are identified by letters (indicating the use of untreated (U) or parboiled (P) rice) and digits (10, 25) indicating the percent content in soybean flour.
Figure 1The amount of proteins solubilized from the various samples in different buffer systems. Aliquots of the various samples were suspended under stirring in 0.05 M sodium phosphate, 0.1 M NaCl, pH 7.0, in the presence/absence of 6 M urea and 10 mM DTT, as indicated. Different letters for results obtained with each buffer system indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05). Samples are identified by letters (indicating the use of untreated (U) or parboiled (P) rice) and digits (10, 25) indicating the percent content in soybean flour.
Figure 2SDS-PAGE profile of proteins solubilized from the various samples in different buffer systems. Aliquots of the various samples were suspended under stirring in 0.05 M sodium phosphate, 0.1 M NaCl, pH 7.0, in the presence/absence of 6 M urea and 10 mM DTT, as indicated. Separations were run on protein samples denatured in the absence (top) or in the presence (bottom) of 2-mercaptoethanol. Samples are identified by letters (indicating the use of untreated (U) or parboiled (P) rice) and digits (10, 25) indicating the percent content in soybean flour.
Figure 3Accessible thiols content of proteins in the various products. Thiols were assessed on finely-ground samples suspended in 0.05 M sodium phosphate, 0.1 M NaCl, pH 7.0, in the presence/absence of 6 M urea as indicated. Different letters for results obtained with each buffer system indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05). Samples are identified by letters (indicating the use of untreated (U) or parboiled (P) rice) and digits (10, 25) indicating the percent content in soybean flour.
Figure 4E-nose PCA score plot (a) and loading plot (b). Samples are identified by letters (indicating the use of untreated (U) or parboiled (P) rice) and digits (10, 25) indicating the percent content in soybean flour.
Figure 5E-tongue PCA score plot (a) and loading plot (b). Samples are identified by letters (indicating the use of untreated (U) or parboiled (P) rice) and digits (10, 25) indicating the percent content in soybean flour.