| Literature DB >> 28231110 |
Yoshiaki Amakura1, Tomoaki Tsutsumi2, Morio Yoshimura3, Masafumi Nakamura4, Hiroshi Handa5, Rieko Matsuda6, Reiko Teshima7, Takahiro Watanabe8.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine whether a simple bioassay used for the detection of dioxins (DXNs) could be applied to detect trace amounts of harmful DXN-like substances in food products. To identify substances with possible DXN-like activity, we assessed the ability of various compounds in the environment to bind the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) that binds specifically to DXNs. The compounds tested included 19 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), 20 PAH derivatives (nitrated, halogenated, and aminated derivatives), 23 pesticides, six amino acids, and eight amino acid metabolites. The AhR binding activities (AhR activity) of these compounds were measured using the chemical activated luciferase gene expression (CALUX) reporter gene assay system. The majority of the PAHs exhibited marked AhR activity that increased in a concentration-dependent manner. Furthermore, there was a positive link between AhR activity and the number of aromatic rings in the PAH derivatives. Conversely, there appeared to be a negative correlation between AhR activity and the number of chlorine residues present on halogenated PAH derivatives. However, there was no correlation between AhR activity and the number and position of substituents among nitrated and aminated derivatives. Among the pesticides tested, the indole-type compounds carbendazim and thiabendazole showed high levels of activity. Similarly, the indole compound tryptamine was the only amino acid metabolite to induce AhR activity. The results are useful in understanding the identification and characterization of AhR ligands in the CALUX assay.Entities:
Keywords: amino acid; aryl hydrocarbon receptor; food hygiene; pesticide; polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon; reporter gene assay
Year: 2016 PMID: 28231110 PMCID: PMC5224577 DOI: 10.3390/foods5010015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
List of the compounds tested.
| No. | PAHs | No. | Pesticides Residues |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1-Amino-4-nitronaphthalene | 40 | Acetamiprid |
| 2 | 9,10-Dinitroanthracene | 41 | Azoxystorobin |
| 3 | 1,3-Dinitronaphthalene | 42 | Carbendazim |
| 4 | 1,5-Dinitronaphthalene | 43 | Chlorpyrifos |
| 5 | 1,8-Dinitronaphthalene | 44 | Chlorpyrifos methyl |
| 6 | 2-Nitroanthracene | 45 | Diazinon |
| 7 | 9-Nitroanthracene | 46 | EPN |
| 8 | 7-Nitrobenzo( | 47 | Fenitrothion |
| 9 | 6-Nitrobenzo( | 48 | Flufenoxuron |
| 10 | 1-Nitronaphthalene | 49 | Imazalil |
| 11 | 2-Nitroanthracene | 50 | Imidacloprid |
| 12 | 1-Chloronaphthalene | 51 | Kresoxim methyl |
| 13 | 2-Chloronaphthalene | 52 | Leucomalachite green |
| 14 | 1,4-Dichloronaphthalene | 53 | Malathion |
| 15 | Octachloronaphthalene | 54 | Methidathion |
| 16 | 1,2,3,4-Tetrachloronaphthalene | 55 | Parathion methyl |
| 17 | 1-Aminoanthracene | 56 | Phenthoate |
| 18 | 2-Aminoanthracene | 57 | Primiphos methyl |
| 19 | 1-Aminonaphthalene | 58 | Prothiofos |
| 20 | 1,8-Diaminonaphthalene | 59 | Pyraclostrobin |
| 21 | Benzo( | 60 | Thiabendazole |
| 22 | Benzo( | 61 | Tolclofos methyl |
| 23 | Cyclopenta( | 62 | Tribenuron methyl |
| 24 | Chrysene | ||
| 25 | 5-Methylchrysene | 63 | 4-Aminobutanoic acid |
| 26 | Benzo( | 64 | Agmatine |
| 27 | Benzo( | 65 | |
| 28 | Benzo( | 66 | Cadaverine |
| 29 | Benzo( | 67 | |
| 30 | Indeno(1,2,3- | 68 | Histamine |
| 31 | Dibenzo( | 69 | Histidine |
| 32 | Benzo( | 70 | |
| 33 | Dibenzo( | 71 | |
| 34 | Dibenzo( | 72 | |
| 35 | Dibenzo( | 73 | |
| 36 | Dibenzo( | 74 | Putrescine |
| 37 | Naphthalene | 75 | Tryptamine |
| 38 | Fluorene | 76 | Tyramine |
| 39 | Anthracene |
Figure 1Chemical structures of the compounds tested.
Figure 2Concentration-response curve of luciferase activity induced by the selected compounds and 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). Approximately 1.5 × 105 cells/well were cultured in 96-well culture plates and exposed to 0.1–100,000 nM concentrations of the selected compounds for 24 h. Cells were then lysed, and luciferase activity was measured using luciferin. The numbers within the graph correspond to the numbers in Table 1.
Responses of the reporter gene system to the selected compounds.
| Compounds | EC RLU5000 a, nM (REP) b |
|---|---|
| TCDD | 0.01 (1) |
| 7-Nitrobenzo( | 1.70 × 103 (5.9 × 10−6) |
| 6-Nitrobenzo( | 1.76 × 102 (5.7 × 10−5) |
| 2-Nitroanthracene ( | 3.81 × 104 (2.6 × 10−7) |
| 2-Chloronaphthalene ( | 2.56 × 104 (3.9 × 10−7) |
| 1,4-Dichloronaphthalene ( | 1.46 × 103 (6.8 × 10−6) |
| 1-Aminonaphthalene ( | 5.00 × 103 (2.0 × 10−6) |
| Benzo( | 2.31 × 103 (4.3 × 10−6) |
| Benzo( | 8.87 × 102 (1.1 × 10−5) |
| Chrysene ( | 2.41 × 102 (4.1 × 10−5) |
| 5-Methylchrysene ( | 2.97 × 104 (3.4 × 10−7) |
| Benzo( | 19.7 (5.1 × 10−4) |
| Benzo( | 2.36 (4.2 × 10−3) |
| Benzo( | 18.8 (5.3 × 10−4) |
| Benzo( | 3.72 (2.7 × 10−3) |
| Indeno(1,2,3- | 20.3 (4.9 × 10−4) |
| Dibenzo( | 1.13 × 102 (8.8 × 10−5) |
| Dibenzo( | 6.17 (1.6 × 10−3) |
| Dibenzo( | 9.32 (1.1 × 10−3) |
| Naphthalene ( | 3.77 × 104 (2.7 × 10−7) |
| Carbendazim ( | 1.30 × 104 (7.7 × 10−7) |
| Thiabendazole ( | 7.10 × 104 (1.4 × 10−7) |
| Tryptamine ( | 2.51 × 104 (4.0 × 10−7) |
a Concentration of compounds required to produce a luciferase activity of 5000 relative light unit (RLU). Values were calculated from the slope of the linear portion of each dose-response curve. b REPs were determined as the ratios of the concentrations of TCDD and the tested compound at EC RLU5000.