Literature DB >> 28230894

Diagnosing Crime and Diagnosing Disease: Bias Reduction Strategies in the Forensic and Clinical Sciences.

Joseph J Lockhart1, Saty Satya-Murti2.   

Abstract

Cognitive effort is an essential part of both forensic and clinical decision-making. Errors occur in both fields because the cognitive process is complex and prone to bias. We performed a selective review of full-text English language literature on cognitive bias leading to diagnostic and forensic errors. Earlier work (1970-2000) concentrated on classifying and raising bias awareness. Recently (2000-2016), the emphasis has shifted toward strategies for "debiasing." While the forensic sciences have focused on the control of misleading contextual cues, clinical debiasing efforts have relied on checklists and hypothetical scenarios. No single generally applicable and effective bias reduction strategy has emerged so far. Generalized attempts at bias elimination have not been particularly successful. It is time to shift focus to the study of errors within specific domains, and how to best communicate uncertainty in order to improve decision making on the part of both the expert and the trier-of-fact.
© 2017 American Academy of Forensic Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bias; checklists; cognition; debiasing; diagnostic errors; forensic medicine; forensic science; observer variation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28230894     DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.13453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Forensic Sci        ISSN: 0022-1198            Impact factor:   1.832


  3 in total

1.  'Anyone who commits such a cruel crime, must be criminally irresponsible': context effects in forensic psychological assessment.

Authors:  Eric Rassin
Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law       Date:  2021-07-13

2.  Epidermis and Enamel: Insights Into Gnawing Criticisms of Human Bitemark Evidence.

Authors:  Robert E Barsley; Mark L Bernstein; Paula C Brumit; Robert B J Dorion; Gregory S Golden; James M Lewis; John D McDowell; Roger D Metcalf; David R Senn; David Sweet; Richard A Weems
Journal:  Am J Forensic Med Pathol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 0.921

Review 3.  The charm of structural neuroimaging in insanity evaluations: guidelines to avoid misinterpretation of the findings.

Authors:  C Scarpazza; S Ferracuti; A Miolla; G Sartori
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 6.222

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.