| Literature DB >> 28230798 |
Qian Lin1, Lina Yang2, Fang Li3, Hong Qin4, Mingzhi Li5, Jihua Chen6, Jing Deng7, Xiangying Hu8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Folic acid supplementation is effective in reducing the risk of neural tube defects (NTDs). However, the use of folic acid is low among rural women in China. Nutrition education can provide information about folic acid and encourage its use. The primary objective of this study was to test the effectiveness of a village-based nutrition intervention on folic acid use among rural women.Entities:
Keywords: folic acid; China; neural tube defects; rural; village‐based intervention; women at birth age
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28230798 PMCID: PMC5331605 DOI: 10.3390/nu9020174
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Pathway of the intervention and primary outcome. FA: folic acid; NTD: neural tube defect.
Awareness and knowledge of folic acid among the rural women at baseline.
| Knowledge Questions | Control Group ( | Intervention Group ( | Total ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Have heard about folic acid | 377 (98.2%) | 365 (97.9%) | 742 (98.0%) |
| Know that “Using of folic acid can prevent NTDs” | 122 (31.7%) | 126 (33.8%) | 248 (32.8%) |
| Know that “Food sources cannot provide enough folic acid“ | 168 (43.8%) | 151 (40.5%) | 319 (42.1%) |
| Know “Best timing to start using folic acid” | 302 (78.6%) | 300 (80.4%) | 602 (79.5%) |
| Know “the recommended duration of folic acid use (3 months before to 3 months after conception “ | 303 (78.9%) | 308 (82.6%) | 611 (80.8%) |
| Know the recommended daily dose of folic acid | 330 (85.9%) | 316 (84.7%) | 646 (85.4%) |
| Source of folic acid information * | |||
| Village family planning staff | 243 (64.6%) | 232 (63.4%) | 475 (64.0%) |
| Village doctors | 195 (51.9%) | 191 (52.2%) | 386 (52.0%) |
| Family/Friends | 58 (15.4%) | 60 (16.4%) | 118 (15.9%) |
| Other | 47 (12.5%) | 43 (11.7%) | 90 (12.1%) |
* women who reported “have heard about folic acid”, n = 742 (376 in control group and 366 in intervention group).
Repeated measures ANOVA for intervention and time for knowledge regarding folic acid.
| Group | Before Intervention Mean ± SD | 12-Months after Intervention Mean ± SD | Repeated Measures ANOVA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Between Subjects (Group) | Time Effect (Within Group Comparison) | Time × Intervention Effect (Between Group Comparison) | |||
| Control ( | 3.11 ± 1.15 | 3.35 ± 0.99 | |||
| Intervention ( | 3.07 ± 1.16 | 3.65 ± 1.00 | |||
Comparison of the intervention group with the control group regarding folic acid use among rural women after intervention.
| Folic Acid Use | Control Group | Intervention Group | Chi-Square | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 194 (68.6%) | 239 (85.4%) | 22.38 | <0.01 | |
| Complied with folic acid supplement recommendations during the three months before pregnancy | 57 (29.4%) | 141 (59.2%) | 38.39 | <0.01 |
| Complied with folic acid supplement recommendations during the first trimester | 53 (27.7%) | 133 (56.3%) | 35.14 | <0.01 |
| Complied with folic acid supplement recommendations from 3 months before to 3 months after conception | 32 (17.0%) | 93 (41.7%) | 29.36 | <0.01 |
Factors associated with compliance with folic acid supplement use from 3 months before to 3 months after conception among rural women according to multivariate logistic regression.
| Variable | Women Who Complied with Folic Acid Supplement Recommendations 3 Months before to 3 Months after Conception | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | S.E. | Wald |
| Sig | OR | 95% CI | |
| Constant | −3.885 | 0.337 | 132.915 | 1 | <0.001 | 0.021 | |
| Received FA education at village clinics | 1.246 | 0.261 | 22.703 | 1 | <0.001 | 3.475 | 2.082–5.802 |
| Received SMS intervention | 0.947 | 0.344 | 7.568 | 1 | 0.006 | 2.578 | 1.313–5.063 |
| Family planning staff followed-up and monitored FA use | 1.339 | 0.179 | 55.923 | 1 | <0.001 | 3.813 | 2.685–5.416 |
| Family support | 0.812 | 0.266 | 9.319 | 1 | 0.002 | 2.252 | 1.337–3.792 |
| FA score above 4 | 0.840 | 0.236 | 17.580 | 1 | <0.001 | 2.692 | 1.694–4.277 |
S.E. = standard error.