Literature DB >> 28229893

Safety and efficacy of natalizumab in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (ACTION): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 trial.

Jacob Elkins1, Roland Veltkamp2, Joan Montaner3, S Claiborne Johnston4, Aneesh B Singhal5, Kyra Becker6, Maarten G Lansberg7, Weihua Tang8, Ih Chang8, Kumar Muralidharan8, Sarah Gheuens8, Lahar Mehta8, Mitchell S V Elkind9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In animal models of acute ischaemic stroke, blocking of the leukocyte-endothelium adhesion by antagonism of α4 integrin reduces infarct volumes and improves outcomes. We assessed the effect of one dose of natalizumab, an antibody against the leukocyte adhesion molecule α4 integrin, in patients with acute ischaemic stroke.
METHODS: In this double-blind, phase 2 study, patients with acute ischaemic stroke (aged 18-85 years) from 30 US and European clinical sites were randomly assigned (1:1) to 300 mg intravenous natalizumab or placebo with stratification by treatment window and baseline infarct size. Patients, investigators, and study staff were masked to treatment assignments. The primary endpoint was the change in infarct volume from baseline to day 5 and was assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints were the change in infarct volume from baseline to day 30, and from 24 h to days 5 and 30; the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at baseline, 24 h, and at days 5 (or discharge), 30, and 90; and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and Barthel Index (BI) at days 5 (or discharge), 30, and 90. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01955707.
FINDINGS: Between Dec 16, 2013, and April 9, 2015, 161 patients were randomly assigned to natalizumab (n=79) or placebo (n=82). Natalizumab did not reduce infarct volume growth from baseline to day 5 compared with placebo (median absolute growth 28 mL [range -8 to 303] vs 22 mL [-11 to 328]; relative growth ratio 1·09 [90% CI 0·91-1·30], p=0·78) or to day 30 (4 mL [-43 to 121] vs 4 mL [-28 to 180]; 1·05 [0·88-1·27], p=0·68), from 24 h to day 5 (8 mL [-30 to 177] vs 7 mL [-13 to 204]; 1·00 [0·89-1·12], p=0·49), and from 24 h to day 30 (-5 mL [-93 to 81] vs -5 mL [-48 to 48]; 0·98 [0·87-1·11], p=0·40). No difference was noted between the natalizumab and placebo groups in the NIHSS (score ≤1 or ≥8 point improvement) from baseline at 24 h, day 5 (or discharge), day 30 (27 [35%] vs 36 [44%]; odds ratio 0·69 [90% CI 0·39-1·21], p=0·86), and day 90 (36 [47%] vs 37 [46%]; 1·10 [0·63-1·93], p=0·39). More patients in the natalizumab group than in the placebo group had mRS scores of 0 or 1 at day 30 (13 [18%] vs seven [9%]; odds ratio 2·88 [90% CI 1·20-6·93], p=0·024) and day 90 (18 [25%] vs 16 [21%]; 1·48 [0·74-2·98], p=0·18); and BI (score ≥95) at day 90 (34 [44%] vs 26 [33%]; 1·91 [1·07-3·41], p=0·033) but not significantly at day 5 or day 30 (26 [34%] vs 26 [32%]; 1·13 [0·63-2·00], p=0·37). Natalizumab and placebo groups had similar incidences of adverse events (77 [99%] of 78 patients vs 81 [99%] of 82 patients), serious adverse events (36 [46%] vs 38 [46%]), and deaths (14 [18%] vs 13 [16%]). Two patients in the natalizumab group died because of adverse events assessed as related to treatment by the investigator (pneumonia, and septic shock and multiorgan failure).
INTERPRETATION: Natalizumab administered up to 9 h after stroke onset did not reduce infarct growth. Treatment-associated benefits on functional outcomes might warrant further investigation. FUNDING: Biogen.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28229893     DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30357-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Neurol        ISSN: 1474-4422            Impact factor:   44.182


  70 in total

1.  Post-Stroke Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption and Poor Functional Outcome in Patients Receiving Thrombolytic Therapy.

Authors:  Zurab Nadareishvili; Alexis N Simpkins; Emi Hitomi; Dennys Reyes; Richard Leigh
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.762

Review 2.  Translational Stroke Research: Vision and Opportunities.

Authors:  Francesca Bosetti; James I Koenig; Cenk Ayata; Stephen A Back; Kyra Becker; Joseph P Broderick; S Thomas Carmichael; Sunghee Cho; Marilyn J Cipolla; Dale Corbett; Roderick A Corriveau; Steven C Cramer; Adam R Ferguson; Seth P Finklestein; Byron D Ford; Karen L Furie; Thomas M Hemmen; Costantino Iadecola; Lyn B Jakeman; Scott Janis; Edward C Jauch; Karen C Johnston; Patrick M Kochanek; Harold Kohn; Eng H Lo; Patrick D Lyden; Carina Mallard; Louise D McCullough; Linda M McGavern; James F Meschia; Claudia S Moy; Miguel A Perez-Pinzon; Ipolia Ramadan; Sean I Savitz; Lee H Schwamm; Gary K Steinberg; Mary P Stenzel-Poore; Michael Tymianski; Steven Warach; Lawrence R Wechsler; John H Zhang; Walter Koroshetz
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 3.  Inflammation, Autoimmunity, Infection, and Stroke: Epidemiology and Lessons From Therapeutic Intervention.

Authors:  Neal S Parikh; Alexander E Merkler; Costantino Iadecola
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Wisdom of the expert crowd prediction of response for 3 neurology randomized trials.

Authors:  Pavel Atanasov; Andreas Diamantaras; Amanda MacPherson; Esther Vinarov; Daniel M Benjamin; Ian Shrier; Friedemann Paul; Ulrich Dirnagl; Jonathan Kimmelman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 5.  Resilience to Injury: A New Approach to Neuroprotection?

Authors:  Neel S Singhal; Chung-Huan Sun; Evan M Lee; Dengke K Ma
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 7.620

6.  Cortisol is More Important than Metanephrines in Driving Changes in Leukocyte Counts after Stroke.

Authors:  Dannielle Zierath; Patricia Tanzi; Dean Shibata; Kyra J Becker
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 2.136

7.  Complement-Dependent Synaptic Uptake and Cognitive Decline after Stroke and Reperfusion Therapy.

Authors:  Ali M Alawieh; E Farris Langley; Wuwei Feng; Alejandro M Spiotta; Stephen Tomlinson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Monoclonal antibody as an emerging therapy for acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Demi Woods; Qian Jiang; Xiang-Ping Chu
Journal:  Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol       Date:  2020-08-25

Review 9.  Targeting Reperfusion Injury in the Age of Mechanical Thrombectomy.

Authors:  Atsushi Mizuma; Je Sung You; Midori A Yenari
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 10.  The Local and Peripheral Immune Responses to Stroke: Implications for Therapeutic Development.

Authors:  Kristy A Zera; Marion S Buckwalter
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 7.620

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.