Literature DB >> 28229361

Moving towards a better understanding of potential pitfalls in quantitative PET myocardial blood flow.

Paul C Cremer1, Frank P DiFilippo2, Wael A Jaber3.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2017        PMID： 28229361     DOI： 10.1007/s12350-017-0828-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN： 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


× No keyword cloud information.
  13 in total

1.  Improved cardiac risk assessment with noninvasive measures of coronary flow reserve.

Authors:  Venkatesh L Murthy; Masanao Naya; Courtney R Foster; Jon Hainer; Mariya Gaber; Gilda Di Carli; Ron Blankstein; Sharmila Dorbala; Arkadiusz Sitek; Michael J Pencina; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Effects of patient movement on measurements of myocardial blood flow and viability in resting ¹⁵O-water PET studies.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Koshino; Hiroshi Watabe; Junichiro Enmi; Yoshiyuki Hirano; Tsutomu Zeniya; Shinji Hasegawa; Takuya Hayashi; Shigeru Miyagawa; Yoshiki Sawa; Jun Hatazawa; Hidehiro Iida
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Anatomic versus physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease. Role of coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and positron emission tomography imaging in revascularization decision-making.

Authors:  K Lance Gould; Nils P Johnson; Timothy M Bateman; Rob S Beanlands; Frank M Bengel; Robert Bober; Paolo G Camici; Manuel D Cerqueira; Benjamin J W Chow; Marcelo F Di Carli; Sharmila Dorbala; Henry Gewirtz; Robert J Gropler; Philipp A Kaufmann; Paul Knaapen; Juhani Knuuti; Michael E Merhige; K Peter Rentrop; Terrence D Ruddy; Heinrich R Schelbert; Thomas H Schindler; Markus Schwaiger; Stefano Sdringola; John Vitarello; Kim A Williams; Donald Gordon; Vasken Dilsizian; Jagat Narula
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Preserved coronary flow reserve effectively excludes high-risk coronary artery disease on angiography.

Authors:  Masanao Naya; Venkatesh L Murthy; Viviany R Taqueti; Courtney R Foster; Josh Klein; Mariya Garber; Sharmila Dorbala; Jon Hainer; Ron Blankstein; Frederick Resnic; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Comparison and prognostic validation of multiple methods of quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb PET.

Authors:  Venkatesh L Murthy; Benjamin C Lee; Arkadiusz Sitek; Masanao Naya; Jonathan Moody; Vivek Polavarapu; Edward P Ficaro; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Cardiac PET/CT misregistration causes significant changes in estimated myocardial blood flow.

Authors:  Mahadevan Rajaram; Abdel K Tahari; Andy H Lee; Martin A Lodge; Benjamin Tsui; Stephan Nekolla; Richard L Wahl; Frank M Bengel; Paco E Bravo
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  ASNC imaging guidelines for SPECT nuclear cardiology procedures: Stress, protocols, and tracers.

Authors:  Milena J Henzlova; W Lane Duvall; Andrew J Einstein; Mark I Travin; Hein J Verberne
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  American Society of Nuclear Cardiology and Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Joint Position Statement on the Clinical Indications for Myocardial Perfusion PET.

Authors:  Timothy M Bateman; Vasken Dilsizian; Rob S Beanlands; E Gordon DePuey; Gary V Heller; David A Wolinsky
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Regadenoson versus dipyridamole hyperemia for cardiac PET imaging.

Authors:  Nils P Johnson; K Lance Gould
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-03-18

10.  Consistent tracer administration profile improves test-retest repeatability of myocardial blood flow quantification with 82Rb dynamic PET imaging.

Authors:  Ran Klein; Adrian Ocneanu; Jennifer M Renaud; Maria C Ziadi; Rob S B Beanlands; Robert A deKemp
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.952
View more
  2 in total

1.  Creeping towards broader clinical application of PET myocardial blood flow quantification.

Authors:  Paul C Cremer; Frank P DiFilippo; Manuel D Cerqueira
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2018. Part 1 of 2: Positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Wael A AlJaroudi; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 5.952
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.