Literature DB >> 28229125

The clinical, neuroanatomical, and neuropathologic phenotype of TBK1-associated frontotemporal dementia: A longitudinal case report.

Carolin A M Koriath1, Martina Bocchetta2, Emilie Brotherhood2, Ione O C Woollacott2, Penny Norsworthy1, Javier Simón-Sánchez3, Cornelis Blauwendraat4, Katrina M Dick2, Elizabeth Gordon2, Sophie R Harding2, Nick C Fox2, Sebastian Crutch2, Jason D Warren2, Tamas Revesz5, Tammaryn Lashley5, Simon Mead1, Jonathan D Rohrer2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Mutations in the TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) gene have recently been shown to cause frontotemporal dementia (FTD). However, the phenotype of TBK1-associated FTD is currently unclear.
METHODS: We performed a single case longitudinal study of a patient who was subsequently found to have a novel A705fs mutation in the TBK1 gene. He was assessed annually over a 7-year period with a series of clinical, cognitive, and magnetic resonance imaging assessments. His brain underwent pathological examination at postmortem.
RESULTS: The patient presented at the age of 64 years with an 18-month history of personality change including increased rigidity and obsessiveness, apathy, loss of empathy, and development of a sweet tooth. His mother had developed progressive behavioral and cognitive impairment from the age of 57 years. Neuropsychometry revealed intact cognition at first assessment. Magnetic resonance imaging showed focal right temporal lobe atrophy. Over the next few years his behavioral problems progressed and he developed cognitive impairment, initially with anomia and prosopagnosia. Neurological examination remained normal throughout without any features of motor neurone disease. He died at the age of 72 years and postmortem showed TDP-43 type A pathology but with an unusual novel feature of numerous TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43)-positive neuritic structures at the cerebral cortex/subcortical white matter junction. There was also associated argyrophilic grain disease not previously reported in other TBK1 mutation cases. DISCUSSION: TBK1-associated FTD can be associated with right temporal variant FTD with progressive behavioral change and relatively intact cognition initially. The case further highlights the benefits of next-generation sequencing technologies in the diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders and the importance of detailed neuropathologic analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Frontotemporal dementia; Neurogenetics; Neuropathology; TBK1

Year:  2016        PMID: 28229125      PMCID: PMC5312484          DOI: 10.1016/j.dadm.2016.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (Amst)        ISSN: 2352-8729


Introduction

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a frequent cause of young-onset dementia with around one-third of cases being familial. Patients may present clinically with behavioral or language problems, with around 10% to 15% also developing motor neurone disease (MND). Mutations in several genes have been linked to FTD and MND with C9orf72 being the most commonly associated gene. However, recent studies have identified mutations in the TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) as a novel cause of both FTD and MND [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Patients with TBK1 mutations have been described with the clinical syndrome of FTD (usually the behavioral variant), MND (usually amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), or the combination of both [6], but few details are currently known about the clinical phenotype, atrophy pattern, and time-course of the disease. In this study, we present a longitudinal case report of a patient with a novel TBK1 mutation assessed over several years.

Methods

The patient had consented to be part of a longitudinal study at the Dementia Research Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, approved by the Local Ethics Committee. As part of the study he underwent a standardized clinical history and examination, neuropsychometric testing, and three-dimensional T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), initially on a 1.5GE Signa scanner (first four scans) and then on a 3T Siemens Trio scanner. Using the volumetric MRI, we calculated cortical volumes using an automated segmentation method as previously described [7]. We also manually segmented the caudate, hippocampus, amygdala, and hypothalamus [8], [9], [10]. All brain volumes were corrected for total intracranial volume, which was calculated using SPM12 (www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm). We used the SPM12 Serial Longitudinal Registration tool to estimate the percentage of volumetric contraction and expansion for each voxel across the different follow-up visits. The patient consented to brain donation and after death his brain was assessed using standard pathological methods at the Queen Square Brain Bank for Neurological Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology. Tissue sections of 7-μm thickness were immunostained using commercially available antibodies to the following proteins: TDP-43 (1:800; 2E2-D3; Abnova); p62 (1:200; BD Transduction Laboratories, Oxford, UK); ubiquitin (1:200; Dako, Ely, UK); α-synuclein (1:1000; 42/syn; BD Biosciences), tau (1:600; AT8; Thermo), or Aβ (1:100; 6F/3D; DAKO) as previously described [11]. Briefly, immunohistochemistry for all antibodies required pressure cooker pretreatment in citrate buffer, pH 6.0. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 0.3% H2O2 in methanol and nonspecific binding with 10% dried milk solution. Tissue sections were incubated with the primary antibodies, followed by biotinylated anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (1:200, 30 minutes; DAKO) and ABC complex (30 minutes; DAKO). Color was developed with diaminobenzidine/H2O2. The patient was tested for mutations in the C9orf72 gene and also using a panel examining 17 genes linked to neurodegeneration (APP, CHMP2B, CSF1R, FUS, GRN, ITM2B, MAPT, NOTCH3, PRNP, PSEN1, PSEN2, SERPINI1, SQSTM1, TARDBP, TREM2, TYROBP, and VCP) [12]. These were negative. Whole-exome sequencing was subsequently carried out using the Agilent SureSelect Human All Exon v2 target enrichment kit (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) followed by paired-end sequencing performed on an Illumina HiSeq2000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA), achieving an average 30-fold depth-of-coverage of target sequence. After trimming and quality control, sequencing reads were aligned to the human reference genome (hg19) using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner [13], followed by variant calling and recalibration by Genome Analysis Toolkit [14] and annotation with SnpEff [15]. Variants of interest were validated by Sanger sequencing. This revealed a novel 13 base pair deletion causing a frameshift mutation in the TBK1 gene (c.G2114del-CTGAAAATAACCA; p.A705fs).

Results

A retired right-handed gentleman presented at the age of 64 years with an 18-month history of personality change including increased rigidity and obsessiveness, apathy, loss of empathy, and development of a sweet tooth. His mother had developed progressive behavioral and cognitive impairment from the age of 57 years but without a formal diagnosis. At his first assessment his Mini-Mental State Examination was 30/30 and neuropsychometry revealed intact cognition (Table 1). Over the next few years his behavioral problems progressed with worsening of his initial symptoms and the development of disinhibition. His cognition also started to become impaired: by 2 years after his initial visit he had developed anomia and prosopagnosia, with impairment on tests of naming and face memory (Table 1). Over the next few visits he subsequently developed impairment of executive function and verbal episodic memory, followed by visuoperceptual problems, and finally impaired single word comprehension and dyscalculia (Table 1). Neurological examination remained normal throughout without any features of MND. He died at the age of 72 years after 9 years of illness.
Table 1

Longitudinal neuropsychometric and neuroimaging measures

Cognitive and imaging measuresInitial visit1 y2 y 1 m3 y 2 m4 y 11 m5 y 11 m6 y 11 m
Neuropsychometry
 Mini-Mental State Examination3030302824NT23
 Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence Total IQ scoreNTNT≥75%–95%≥75%–95%≥25%–50%≥25%–50%≥5%–10%
 Episodic memory
 Recognition Memory Test for Words≥95%≥95%≥75%NT≥10%–25%<5%<5%
 Recognition Memory Test for Faces≥50%–75%≥50%≥5%–10%NT<5%<5%<5%
 California Verbal Learning Test Delay Recall≥75%≥75%–95%≥50%NTNTNTNT
 California Verbal Learning Test Delay Recognition≥75%–95%≥75%–95%≥75%–90%NTNTNTNT
 Language
 Graded Naming Test≥50%–75%≥50%–75%≥5%–10%NT<5%<5%<5%
 British Picture Vocabulary ScaleNTNTNTNT≥50%–75%<5%<5%
 Synonyms TaskNTNT≥95%≥10%–25%NTNTNT
 National Adult Reading Test≥75%–95%≥75%–95%≥75%–95%NT≥75%–95%≥25%–50%≥25%–50%
 Calculation
 Graded Difficulty Arithmetic TestNTNTNT≥95%≥95%≥95%≥75%–95%
 Visuoperceptual skills
 Visual Object and Space Perception battery: Object Decision subtestNTNT≥75%–95%≥50%–75%≥25%–50%≥5%–10%<5%
 Attention and executive function
 D-KEFS Color-Word Interference Test
 Color NamingNTNTNTNT≥25%–50%<5%<5%
 Word ReadingNTNTNTNT≥50%–75%≥25%–50%≥50%–75%
 Ink-Color NamingNTNTNTNT≥50%–75%<5%≥25%–50%
 Trail Making Test Part A≥10%–25%≥10%–25%≥10%–25%≥5%–10%NTNTNT
 Trail Making Test Part B≥10%–25%≥50%–75%≥25%–50%≥25%–50%NTNTNT
 Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised Digit Span ForwardNTNTNTNT≥50%–75%≥25%–50%≥25%–50%
 Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised Digit Span BackwardNTNTNTNT≥50%–75%≥50%–75%≥50%–75%
Neuroimaging
 Cortical volumes (% of TIV)
 Frontal
 Right5.35.25.35.14.9NANA
 Left5.55.55.55.45.2NANA
 Temporal
 Right3.23.12.92.82.8NANA
 Left3.73.63.53.33.2NANA
 Insula
 Right0.330.290.280.260.26NANA
 Left0.380.360.330.300.31NANA
 Subcortical volumes (% of TIV)
 Caudate
 Right0.170.160.150.120.10NANA
 Left0.170.180.160.150.13NANA
 Hippocampus
 Right0.130.130.120.100.09NANA
 Left0.130.130.120.110.10NANA
 Amygdala
 Right0.0560.0560.0400.0410.032NANA
 Left0.0690.0640.0520.0470.039NANA
 Hypothalamus
 Right0.0290.0210.0190.0160.016NANA
 Left0.0300.0230.0240.0190.017NANA

Abbreviations: NA, not analyzable; NT, not tested; D-KEFS, Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System; TIV, total intracranial volume.

NOTE. For neuropsychometric measures, scores are given as percentiles. For neuroimaging measures, volumes of regions are given as a percentage of TIV.

For fifth visit, neuropsychometry was performed at 4 years 11 months from baseline and magnetic resonance imaging scan was performed at 5 years 1 month.

His initial MRI scan showed evidence of focal right temporal lobe atrophy, particularly affecting the anterior temporal lobe and the amygdala (Table 1, Fig. 1). Over a period of time, atrophy spread from the right temporal lobe to involve the right frontal lobe (particularly the orbitofrontal cortex), and more posteriorly to involve the right posterior temporal lobe, hippocampus, and anterior parietal lobe. Subcortical involvement including the caudate and hypothalamus was also seen (Table 1). Atrophy progressed over time to involve the left hemisphere, following a similar pattern to the right, focused initially on the anterior and medial temporal lobe (Fig. 1). However, atrophy remained asymmetrical throughout the disease process, being greater on the right than on the left side (Table 1, Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

(A) Coronal sections of T1 volumetric magnetic resonance imaging scans at baseline and at the following four follow-up visits. In the lower panels, a close-up of the amygdala shows progressive asymmetrical medial temporal lobe atrophy. (B) Coronal sections at the level of the frontal (top) and mid-temporal lobes (second row), axial section through the orbitofrontal and medial temporal lobe (third row), and sagittal section through the right hemisphere (bottom). The first column represents the baseline scan with the four columns to the right showing a longitudinal SPM overlay (in comparison with the baseline scan) with yellow/red representing 5% or greater volumetric contraction and blue representing 5% or greater volumetric expansion. At the first follow-up scan atrophy is localized to the right temporal lobe and orbitofrontal lobe, but over time spreads dorsally and posteriorly, involving the frontal lobe, posterior temporal lobe, and similar areas in the contralateral hemisphere.

Macroscopic examination of the brain revealed cortical atrophy, which was more severe in the temporal lobe than the frontal lobe (Fig. 2A) with severe reduction in the bulk of the amygdala and hippocampus, and evidence of hippocampal sclerosis. The substantia nigra showed severe pallor (Fig. 2B), and the locus coeruleus was also pale. The brainstem and cerebellum appeared normal. Microscopically, the normal neocortical hexalaminar architecture was variably disrupted by spongiosis and nerve cell loss across the cortex. This was mild atrophy in the prefrontal cortex but severe in the anterior cingulate gyrus and very severe in the temporal cortex with a clear gradient toward the medial temporal lobe structures. Accordingly, the fusiform gyrus and the parahippocampus were the most severely affected regions showing severe nerve cell loss and an advanced spongy state. α-Synuclein and Aβ immunohistochemical preparations were negative throughout all areas and no “star-like” p62-positive granular inclusions were seen in the granule cells of the dentate fascia or the cerebellum. TDP-43 immunohistochemistry demonstrated a mixture of different lesions in the cortical areas, including neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions, short curved dystrophic neurites, and coiled bodies (Fig. 2D). An unusual feature was the presence of numerous TDP-43–positive neuritic structures and also oligodendroglial inclusions at the cerebral cortex/subcortical white matter junction (Fig. 2E). Only occasional TDP-43–positive neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions were seen in the granule cells of the dentate fascia (Fig. 2C) and only occasional neuritic structures in the amygdala. TDP-43–positive inclusions corresponded to frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD)-TDP type A pathology. Lower motor neurons were investigated in the 12th nerve nucleus for TDP-43 pathology: no pathological inclusions were seen and normal TDP-43 immunohistochemistry was observed with TDP-43 found in the nucleus, i.e. there was no pathological evidence of MND. Tau immunohistochemistry demonstrated not only occasional neuropil threads (NTs) in the prefrontal and parietal cortices but also neurofibrillary tangles, pretangles, NTs, and coiled bodies (Fig. 2F) in the temporal cortex, particularly in the medial temporal region. Severe tau pathology was observed in the hippocampal formation and parahippocampus, where pretangles and NTs were seen throughout and grain-like structures observed in the subiculum (Fig. 2G) consistent with argyrophilic grain disease. Pretangles and neurofibrillary tangles were seen in the granule cells of the dentate fascia (Fig. 2H). Tau-positive coiled bodies, NTs, and an occasional tufted astrocyte-like structure were seen in the pontine tegmentum. There was minimal Purkinje cell loss in the cerebellar cortex and occasional NTs were present in the dentate nucleus.
Fig. 2

Macroscopic and microscopic pathological features. Enlargement of the lateral ventricle was evident (A, double arrow) and severe atrophy of the temporal lobe (A, arrow). The substantia nigra showed severe pallor (B, arrow). TDP-43 immunohistochemistry highlighted occasional neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions in the granule cell layer of the hippocampus (C, arrow). Neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions (D, arrow) and short neuropil threads (D, double arrow) were also observed in the gray matter of the temporal cortex and many short curved dystrophic neurites were seen in the white matter (E). Tau immunohistochemistry showed coiled bodies in the temporal white matter (F, arrow), argyrophilic grains in the subiculum (G), and neurofibrillary tangles in the granule cell layer of the hippocampus (H). Bar in C represents 40 μm in C, E, and H and 60 μm in D, F, and G.

Discussion

We describe the clinical, cognitive, and neuroanatomical progression over 9 years of a patient with FTD due to a novel TBK1 mutation who was found to have FTLD-TDP type A pathology. This case highlights a number of important and novel aspects of TBK1 mutations as well as the description of a novel mutation, it also reveals the clinical and neuroanatomical phenotype that can be associated with TBK1 mutations, and the nature of disease progression. The 13 base pair deletion causes a frameshift introducing a premature stop codon and is therefore likely to be pathogenic even in the absence of supporting segregation or functional data. Haploinsufficiency is a known disease mechanism for TBK1, and loss-of-function mutations in TBK1 have already been described in patients with FTD, MND, and FTD-MND [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. The most common clinical phenotype associated with TBK1 mutations is FTD-MND rather than FTD alone, with the frequency in patient cohorts 3.0% to 4.5% and 0.5% to 1.1%, respectively [3], [4]. However, despite close clinical follow-up, our patient exhibited no signs of MND. In terms of the specific FTD phenotype, most patients described in the literature so far have presented with behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), rather than the language variant, consistent with the case here, although there appears to be a high prevalence of early memory impairment [3], [6]. Despite our patient complaining of subjective cognitive symptoms early in the disease, his neuropsychometric testing remained normal initially with the development of anomia and prosopagnosia only a few years into the illness. The disease duration in our patient was 9 years with an onset at 63 years, which is not dissimilar from findings of a recent study showing a mean onset of 66.3 years and a disease duration of 8.2 years [6]. Previous studies have not detailed the neuroanatomical phenotype of TBK1 mutations. Here, we have shown an association with right temporal lobe atrophy. This anatomical variant of FTD has been found to be caused by a number of pathologies, with patients presenting with bvFTD more likely to have tau pathology, and those with the semantic dementia phenotype likely to have TDP-43 pathology [16], [17]. Here, we describe a case with bvFTD who has FTLD-TDP type A and a TBK1 mutation, a novel association with right temporal lobe variant FTD. Progression of atrophy over time was consistent with a number of other right temporal lobe cases who remain with an asymmetrical pattern of involvement but develop a similar pattern of focal temporal lobe involvement in the opposite temporal lobe as the disease progresses. Little is known about the neuropathology of TBK1 mutations but previous cases have shown either FTLD-TDP type A or type B pathology, with the histological findings in our case being consistent with type A. Although it fits criteria for this subtype, there were nonetheless some unusual novel features with the presence of numerous TDP-43–positive neuritic structures at the cerebral cortex/subcortical white matter junction. This case also had associated tau pathology consistent with argyrophilic grain disease, which has not been seen in other TBK1 mutation cases. Further research is needed to understand the complete phenotype of patients with TBK1 mutations but it should be considered as a cause of right temporal variant FTD, and in patients who present with familial FTD, whether MND is present or not. Systematic review: TBK1 mutations have recently been linked to frontotemporal dementia (FTD). To put our findings into context, we reviewed the literature on Pubmed Central relating to other published TBK1 cases and research. Interpretation: Our findings detail the natural long-term progression in a case of TBK1-associated FTD and further characterize the related neuropathologic findings. In addition, the case emphasizes the benefits of next-generation sequencing technologies in the diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders. Future directions: Further functional studies of TBK1 and other genes linked to neurodegenerative diseases are needed to fully comprehend how loss-of-function and other mutations affect cellular pathways and cause disease.
  17 in total

1.  The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data.

Authors:  Aaron McKenna; Matthew Hanna; Eric Banks; Andrey Sivachenko; Kristian Cibulskis; Andrew Kernytsky; Kiran Garimella; David Altshuler; Stacey Gabriel; Mark Daly; Mark A DePristo
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Whole-genome sequencing reveals important role for TBK1 and OPTN mutations in frontotemporal lobar degeneration without motor neuron disease.

Authors:  Cyril Pottier; Kevin F Bieniek; NiCole Finch; Maartje van de Vorst; Matt Baker; Ralph Perkersen; Patricia Brown; Thomas Ravenscroft; Marka van Blitterswijk; Alexandra M Nicholson; Michael DeTure; David S Knopman; Keith A Josephs; Joseph E Parisi; Ronald C Petersen; Kevin B Boylan; Bradley F Boeve; Neill R Graff-Radford; Joris A Veltman; Christian Gilissen; Melissa E Murray; Dennis W Dickson; Rosa Rademakers
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 17.088

3.  TBK1 mutation frequencies in French frontotemporal dementia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis cohorts.

Authors:  Isabelle Le Ber; Anne De Septenville; Stéphanie Millecamps; Agnès Camuzat; Paola Caroppo; Philippe Couratier; Frédéric Blanc; Lucette Lacomblez; François Sellal; Marie-Céline Fleury; Vincent Meininger; Cécile Cazeneuve; Fabienne Clot; Olivier Flabeau; Eric LeGuern; Alexis Brice
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.673

4.  Haploinsufficiency of TBK1 causes familial ALS and fronto-temporal dementia.

Authors:  Axel Freischmidt; Thomas Wieland; Benjamin Richter; Wolfgang Ruf; Veronique Schaeffer; Kathrin Müller; Nicolai Marroquin; Frida Nordin; Annemarie Hübers; Patrick Weydt; Susana Pinto; Rayomond Press; Stéphanie Millecamps; Nicolas Molko; Emilien Bernard; Claude Desnuelle; Marie-Hélène Soriani; Johannes Dorst; Elisabeth Graf; Ulrika Nordström; Marisa S Feiler; Stefan Putz; Tobias M Boeckers; Thomas Meyer; Andrea S Winkler; Juliane Winkelman; Mamede de Carvalho; Dietmar R Thal; Markus Otto; Thomas Brännström; Alexander E Volk; Petri Kursula; Karin M Danzer; Peter Lichtner; Ivan Dikic; Thomas Meitinger; Albert C Ludolph; Tim M Strom; Peter M Andersen; Jochen H Weishaupt
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Atypical nucleus accumbens morphology in psychopathy: another limbic piece in the puzzle.

Authors:  Marina Boccardi; Martina Bocchetta; Hannu J Aronen; Eila Repo-Tiihonen; Olli Vaurio; Paul M Thompson; Jari Tiihonen; Giovanni B Frisoni
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  2013-02-08

6.  A comparative clinical, pathological, biochemical and genetic study of fused in sarcoma proteinopathies.

Authors:  Tammaryn Lashley; Jonathan D Rohrer; Rina Bandopadhyay; Charles Fry; Zeshan Ahmed; Adrian M Isaacs; Jack H Brelstaff; Barbara Borroni; Jason D Warren; Claire Troakes; Andrew King; Safa Al-Saraj; Jia Newcombe; Niall Quinn; Karen Ostergaard; Henrik Daa Schrøder; Marie Bojsen-Møller; Hans Braendgaard; Nick C Fox; Martin N Rossor; Andrew J Lees; Janice L Holton; Tamas Revesz
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Validation of next-generation sequencing technologies in genetic diagnosis of dementia.

Authors:  John Beck; Alan Pittman; Gary Adamson; Tracy Campbell; Joanna Kenny; Henry Houlden; Jon D Rohrer; Rohan de Silva; Maryam Shoai; James Uphill; Mark Poulter; John Hardy; Catherine J Mummery; Jason D Warren; Jonathan M Schott; Nick C Fox; Martin N Rossor; John Collinge; Simon Mead
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 4.673

8.  Temporal Variant Frontotemporal Dementia is Associated with Globular Glial Tauopathy.

Authors:  Camilla N Clark; Tammaryn Lashley; Colin J Mahoney; Jason D Warren; Tamas Revesz; Jonathan D Rohrer
Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.600

9.  Loss of TBK1 is a frequent cause of frontotemporal dementia in a Belgian cohort.

Authors:  Ilse Gijselinck; Sara Van Mossevelde; Julie van der Zee; Anne Sieben; Stéphanie Philtjens; Bavo Heeman; Sebastiaan Engelborghs; Mathieu Vandenbulcke; Greet De Baets; Veerle Bäumer; Ivy Cuijt; Marleen Van den Broeck; Karin Peeters; Maria Mattheijssens; Frederic Rousseau; Rik Vandenberghe; Peter De Jonghe; Patrick Cras; Peter P De Deyn; Jean-Jacques Martin; Marc Cruts; Christine Van Broeckhoven
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Clinical features of TBK1 carriers compared with C9orf72, GRN and non-mutation carriers in a Belgian cohort.

Authors:  Sara Van Mossevelde; Julie van der Zee; Ilse Gijselinck; Sebastiaan Engelborghs; Anne Sieben; Tim Van Langenhove; Jan De Bleecker; Jonathan Baets; Mathieu Vandenbulcke; Koen Van Laere; Sarah Ceyssens; Marleen Van den Broeck; Karin Peeters; Maria Mattheijssens; Patrick Cras; Rik Vandenberghe; Peter De Jonghe; Jean-Jacques Martin; Peter P De Deyn; Marc Cruts; Christine Van Broeckhoven
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Neuroimaging in genetic frontotemporal dementia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Suvi Häkkinen; Stephanie A Chu; Suzee E Lee
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 5.996

2.  Speech and Language Presentations of FTLD-TDP Type B Neuropathology.

Authors:  Daniel J Lee; Eileen H Bigio; Emily J Rogalski; M-Marsel Mesulam
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 3.685

3.  Clinicopathologic correlations in a family with a TBK1 mutation presenting as primary progressive aphasia and primary lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Veronica Hirsch-Reinshagen; Omar A Alfaify; Ging-Yuek R Hsiung; Cyril Pottier; Matt Baker; Ralph B Perkerson; Rosa Rademakers; Hanna Briemberg; Dean J Foti; Ian R Mackenzie
Journal:  Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 4.092

Review 4.  RNA Binding Proteins and the Pathogenesis of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Hofmann; William W Seeley; Eric J Huang
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 23.472

5.  Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration TDP-43-Immunoreactive Pathological Subtypes: Clinical and Mechanistic Significance.

Authors:  Manuela Neumann; Edward B Lee; Ian R Mackenzie
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  TBK1 interacts with tau and enhances neurodegeneration in tauopathy.

Authors:  Measho H Abreha; Shamsideen Ojelade; Eric B Dammer; Zachary T McEachin; Duc M Duong; Marla Gearing; Gary J Bassell; James J Lah; Allan I Levey; Joshua M Shulman; Nicholas T Seyfried
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  A novel TBK1 mutation in a family with diverse frontotemporal dementia spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Ruth Lamb; Jonathan D Rohrer; Raquel Real; Steven J Lubbe; Adrian J Waite; Derek J Blake; R Jon Walters; Tammaryn Lashley; Tamas Revesz; Janice L Holton; Huw R Morris
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud       Date:  2019-06-03

8.  Deletion of Tbk1 disrupts autophagy and reproduces behavioral and locomotor symptoms of FTD-ALS in mice.

Authors:  Weisong Duan; Moran Guo; Le Yi; Jie Zhang; Yue Bi; Yakun Liu; Yuanyuan Li; Zhongyao Li; Yanqin Ma; Guisen Zhang; Yaling Liu; Xueqing Song; Chunyan Li
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 5.682

Review 9.  An update on genetic frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Caroline V Greaves; Jonathan D Rohrer
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  CYLD is a causative gene for frontotemporal dementia - amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Carol Dobson-Stone; Marianne Hallupp; Hamideh Shahheydari; Audrey M G Ragagnin; Zac Chatterton; Francine Carew-Jones; Claire E Shepherd; Holly Stefen; Esmeralda Paric; Thomas Fath; Elizabeth M Thompson; Peter Blumbergs; Cathy L Short; Colin D Field; Peter K Panegyres; Jane Hecker; Garth Nicholson; Alex D Shaw; Janice M Fullerton; Agnes A Luty; Peter R Schofield; William S Brooks; Neil Rajan; Mark F Bennett; Melanie Bahlo; John E Landers; Olivier Piguet; John R Hodges; Glenda M Halliday; Simon D Topp; Bradley N Smith; Christopher E Shaw; Emily McCann; Jennifer A Fifita; Kelly L Williams; Julie D Atkin; Ian P Blair; John B Kwok
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 15.255

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.