Literature DB >> 28228457

Impact of Workplace Physical Activity Interventions on Physical Activity and Cardiometabolic Health Among Working-Age Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Jennifer L Reed1, Stephanie A Prince2, Cara G Elliott2, Kerri-Anne Mullen2, Heather E Tulloch2, Swapnil Hiremath2, Lisa M Cotie2, Andrew L Pipe2, Robert D Reid2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death among women in high-income Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. Physical activity is protective for cardiovascular disease. The realities of modern life require working-age women to address work-related, family, and social demands. Few working-age women meet current moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) recommendations. Given that working-age women spend a substantial proportion of their waking hours at work, places of employment may be an opportune and a controlled setting to implement programs, improving MVPA levels and enhancing cardiometabolic health. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Eight electronic databases were searched to identify all prospective cohort and experimental studies reporting an MVPA outcome of workplace interventions for working-age women (mean age, 18-65 years) in high-income Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool; quality of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. A qualitative synthesis was performed for all studies, and meta-analyses were conducted where possible. Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria; 20 studies were included in the meta-analyses. Workplace interventions significantly increased minutes per week of metabolic equivalents (4 studies; standardized mean differences, 2.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44 to 2.69), but not minutes per week of MVPA (13 studies; standardized mean differences, 0.38; 95% CI, -0.15 to 0.92) or metabolic equivalents per week (3 studies; standardized mean differences, 0.11; 95% CI, -0.48 to 0.71). Workplace interventions also significantly decreased body mass (7 studies; mean differences, -0.83 kg; 95% CI, -1.64 to -0.02), body mass index (6 studies; mean differences, -0.35 kg/m2; 95% CI, -0.62 to -0.07), low-density lipoprotein (4 studies; mean differences, -0.11 mmol/L; 95% CI, -0.17 to -0.04), and blood glucose (2 studies; mean differences, -0.18 mmol/L; 95% CI, -0.29 to -0.07). These workplace interventions targeting MVPA levels and known beneficial cardiometabolic health sequelae were of lower quality evidence.
CONCLUSIONS: Workplace interventions variably improve MVPA levels and related cardiometabolic health sequelae of working-age women in high-income Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. Our findings underscore the need for ongoing research in this area but also increased dissemination of the existing programs and knowledge.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  exercise; motor activity; risk; women; workplace

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28228457     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  13 in total

Review 1.  Effects of Workplace-Based Physical Activity Interventions on Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Naomi L Burn; Matthew Weston; Neil Maguire; Greg Atkinson; Kathryn L Weston
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  What should governments be doing to prevent diabetes throughout the life course?

Authors:  Patrick Timpel; Lorenz Harst; Doreen Reifegerste; Susann Weihrauch-Blüher; Peter E H Schwarz
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 10.122

3.  Physical activity outcomes from a randomized trial of a theory- and technology-enhanced intervention for Latinas: the Seamos Activas II study.

Authors:  Bess H Marcus; Shira Dunsiger; Dorothy Pekmezi; Tanya Benitez; Britta Larsen; Dawn Meyer
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2021-08-11

4.  Workplace pedometer interventions for increasing physical activity.

Authors:  Rosanne LA Freak-Poli; Miranda Cumpston; Loai Albarqouni; Stacy A Clemes; Anna Peeters
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-21

5.  Device-measured physical activity, sedentary behaviour and cardiometabolic health and fitness across occupational groups: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stephanie A Prince; Cara G Elliott; Kyle Scott; Sarah Visintini; Jennifer L Reed
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 6.457

6.  Effect of workplace physical activity interventions on the cardio-metabolic health of working adults: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rubina Mulchandani; Ambalam M Chandrasekaran; Roopa Shivashankar; Dimple Kondal; Anurag Agrawal; Jeemon Panniyammakal; Nikhil Tandon; Dorairaj Prabhakaran; Meenakshi Sharma; Shifalika Goenka
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 6.457

7.  Brief Exercise at Work (BE@Work): A Mixed-Methods Pilot Trial of a Workplace High-Intensity Interval Training Intervention.

Authors:  Naomi L Burn; Matthew Weston; Greg Atkinson; Michael Graham; Kathryn L Weston
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2021-07-02

8.  Factors Related to Unemployment in Europe. A Cross-Sectional Study from the COURAGE Survey in Finland, Poland and Spain.

Authors:  Matilde Leonardi; Davide Guido; Rui Quintas; Fabiola Silvaggi; Erika Guastafierro; Andrea Martinuzzi; Somnath Chatterji; Seppo Koskinen; Beata Tobiasz-Adamczyk; Josep Maria Haro; Maria Cabello; Alberto Raggi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  Understanding how outcomes are measured in workplace physical activity interventions: a scoping review.

Authors:  Stacey Johnson; Jean-Philippe Regnaux; Adrien Marck; Geoffroy Berthelot; Joana Ungureanu; Jean-François Toussaint
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 10.  Blood Sugar Regulation for Cardiovascular Health Promotion and Disease Prevention: JACC Health Promotion Series.

Authors:  Peter E H Schwarz; Patrick Timpel; Lorenz Harst; Colin J Greaves; Mohammed K Ali; Jeffrey Lambert; Mary Beth Weber; Mohamad M Almedawar; Henning Morawietz
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.