Lesli E Skolarus1, Vicki A Freedman2, Chunyang Feng2, James F Burke2. 1. From the Stroke Program, Department of Neurology (L.E.S., C.F., J.F.B.) and Institute for Social Research (V.A.F.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; and Center for Clinical Management and Research, Ann Arbor VA, MI (J.F.B.). lerusche@umich.edu. 2. From the Stroke Program, Department of Neurology (L.E.S., C.F., J.F.B.) and Institute for Social Research (V.A.F.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; and Center for Clinical Management and Research, Ann Arbor VA, MI (J.F.B.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Blacks have higher stroke incidence and experience greater poststroke disability than whites. To optimize care for stroke survivors, it is important to understand the amount of care that they receive and the implications for stroke caregivers. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 2 nationally representative, population-based studies, the NHATS (National Health and Aging Trends Study) linked to the NSOC (National Study of Caregiving), were used to identify elderly stroke survivors and their caregivers. We compared hours of care received and unmet activity need among the 581 white and 225 black stroke survivors. We then performed racial comparisons of positive and negative aspects of caregiving reported by caregivers of black and white stroke survivors. Black stroke survivors were more likely than white stroke survivors to have a caregiver (62.5% versus 49.7%; P<0.01) and received on average more hours of help per week (31.7 versus 20.5; P<0.01). There was little racial difference in unmet need for assistance. Caregivers of black stroke survivors reported more positive aspects of caregiving than caregivers of white stroke survivors (6.8 versus 6.0; P<0.01). There was no racial difference in negative aspects of caregiving, depression, or anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: Black stroke survivors received an average of ≈11 more hours of care than white stroke survivors without substantial differences in unmet need. Despite providing more hours of care, caregivers of black stroke were more positive about their caregiver role than caregivers of white stroke survivors.
BACKGROUND: Blacks have higher stroke incidence and experience greater poststroke disability than whites. To optimize care for stroke survivors, it is important to understand the amount of care that they receive and the implications for stroke caregivers. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 2 nationally representative, population-based studies, the NHATS (National Health and Aging Trends Study) linked to the NSOC (National Study of Caregiving), were used to identify elderly stroke survivors and their caregivers. We compared hours of care received and unmet activity need among the 581 white and 225 black stroke survivors. We then performed racial comparisons of positive and negative aspects of caregiving reported by caregivers of black and white stroke survivors. Black stroke survivors were more likely than white stroke survivors to have a caregiver (62.5% versus 49.7%; P<0.01) and received on average more hours of help per week (31.7 versus 20.5; P<0.01). There was little racial difference in unmet need for assistance. Caregivers of black stroke survivors reported more positive aspects of caregiving than caregivers of white stroke survivors (6.8 versus 6.0; P<0.01). There was no racial difference in negative aspects of caregiving, depression, or anxiety. CONCLUSIONS:Black stroke survivors received an average of ≈11 more hours of care than white stroke survivors without substantial differences in unmet need. Despite providing more hours of care, caregivers of black stroke were more positive about their caregiver role than caregivers of white stroke survivors.
Authors: Vicki A Freedman; Judith D Kasper; Jennifer C Cornman; Emily M Agree; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Vincent Mor; Brenda C Spillman; Robert Wallace; Douglas A Wolf Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2011-06-29 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Virginia J Howard; Dawn O Kleindorfer; Suzanne E Judd; Leslie A McClure; Monika M Safford; J David Rhodes; Mary Cushman; Claudia S Moy; Elsayed Z Soliman; Brett M Kissela; George Howard Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2011-03-17 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Kurt Kroenke; Robert L Spitzer; Janet B W Williams; Patrick O Monahan; Bernd Löwe Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2007-03-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Feng Qian; Gregg C Fonarow; Eric E Smith; Ying Xian; Wenqin Pan; Edward L Hannan; Benjamin A Shaw; Laurent G Glance; Eric D Peterson; Zubin J Eapen; Adrian F Hernandez; Lee H Schwamm; Deepak L Bhatt Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2013-05-16
Authors: Suzanne Perea Burns; Brandi M White; Gayenell Magwood; Charles Ellis; Ayaba Logan; Joy N Jones Buie; Robert J Adams Journal: Disabil Rehabil Date: 2018-03-23 Impact factor: 3.033
Authors: Zainab Toteh Osakwe; Charles Senteio; Omonigho Michael Bubu; Chinedu Obioha; Arlener D Turner; Sujata Thawani; Rose Saint Fleur-Calixte; Girardin Jean-Louis Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2022-02-03 Impact factor: 5.750