| Literature DB >> 28228408 |
Michel Haagdorens1,2, Joséphine Behaegel1,3, Jos Rozema1,2, Veerle Van Gerwen1, Sofie Michiels2, Sorcha Ní Dhubhghaill1,2, Marie-José Tassignon1,2, Nadia Zakaria1,2,4.
Abstract
AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of Fourier domain-optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) in imaging and quantifying the limbal palisades of Vogt and to correlate these images with histological findings.Entities:
Keywords: Cornea; Imaging; Physiology; Stem Cells
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28228408 PMCID: PMC5574400 DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309549
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Ophthalmol ISSN: 0007-1161 Impact factor: 4.638
Figure 1Slit-lamp photograph of an inferior limbal rim of a pigmented subject (left) and its magnification (right). The arrow indicates the palisades of Vogt (POV). According to the classification of Townsend, these POV would be ruled as attenuated that is, the structures are visible but have a low degree of pigmentation.2
Figure 2Steps of the OCT image analysis: (A) selection of the region of interest on the OCT image; (B) location on the limbus; (C) detail of the delineated region, flattened to account for the corneal curvature; (D) mean grey scale values of (C) calculated along the vertical direction in arbitrary units, along with the manually placed markers (red circles), indicating the minima and maxima of the grey scale variations and the automatically calculated midpoints (black circles). The complete limbal region visualised on the OCT scan is analysed following these methods. The delineated region in image (B) is for illustrative purposes only and does not limit a region of analysis. ERP, epithelial rete pegs; OCT, optical coherence tomography; PR, palisade ridge.
Subject details*
| Subjects | 50 |
| Male/female | 15/35 (30/70%) |
| Age, years† | 27.6±5.5 (21–51) |
| <30 | 37 (74%) |
| ≥30 | 13 (26%) |
| Iris colour‡ | |
| Blue/grey/green | 29 (58%) |
| Hazel/brown/black | 21 (42%) |
*Number (%).
†Mean±SD (range).
‡Adapted from Grieve and Morant.15
Visibility of crypt structures
| Visible on OCT | Not visible on OCT | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Visible on slit lamp | 145/200 (72.5%) | 1/200 (0.5%) | 146/200 (73%) |
| Not visible on slit lamp | 49 (24.5%) | 5/200 (2.5%) | 54/200 (27%) |
| Total | 194/200 (97%) | 6/200 (3%) |
OCT, optical coherence tomography.
Statistical overview of the parameters
| PD (palisades/mm) | ΔPR (μm) | ΔERP (μm) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Descriptive* | |||
| OD Inf | 7.51±1.67 (42) | 70.28±17.50 (42) | 69.84±16.87 (42) |
| OD Sup | 6.60±2.00 (31) | 81.82±22.86 (31) | 81.74±22.76 (31) |
| OS Inf | 7.82±1.49 (41) | 66.25±12.98 (41) | 66.18±12.66 (41) |
| OS Sup | 7.45±1.69 (28) | 70.77±17.86 (28) | 70.93±17.82 (28) |
| Comparative† | |||
| OD: Inf vs Sup |
|
|
|
| OS: Inf vs Sup | 0.412 | 0.339 | 0.367 |
| Inf: OD vs OS | 0.314 | 0.230 | 0.273 |
| Sup: OD vs OS |
|
|
|
| Correlation‡ | |||
| OD: Inf vs Sup |
|
|
|
| OS: Inf vs Sup | 0.133 (0.527) | 0.057 (0.787) | 0.167 (0.426) |
| Inf: OD vs OS |
|
|
|
| Sup: OD vs OS |
|
|
|
*Mean±SD (N).
†Wilcoxon test for two related samples, significance level at p<0.05.
‡Spearman ρ (p value), significance level at p<0.05; significant correlations shown in boldface.
ERP, epithelial rete peg; Inf, inferior; OD, right eye; OS, left eye; PD, palisade density; PR, palisade ridges; Sup, superior.
Influence of gender, age or pigmentation (p values)*
| Comparison | PD (palisades/mm) | ΔPR (μm) | ΔERP (μm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| OD inferior | |||
| Gender (male vs female) | 0.436 | 0.362 | 0.571 |
| Age (<30 vs≥30) |
| 0.052 |
|
| Blue/grey/green vs hazel/brown/black |
|
|
|
| OS inferior | |||
| Gender (male vs female) | 0.289 | 0.221 | 0.383 |
| Age | 0.287 | 0.238 | 0.372 |
| Blue/grey/green vs hazel/brown/black | 0.099 | 0.102 | 0.133 |
| OD superior | |||
| Gender (male vs female) | 0.451 | 0.451 | 0.427 |
| Age | 0.842 | 0.877 | 0.808 |
| Blue/grey/green vs hazel/brown/black | 0.297 | 0.336 | 0.279 |
| OS superior | |||
| Gender (male vs female) | 0.862 | 0.784 | 0.823 |
| Age |
|
|
|
| Blue/grey/green vs. hazel/brown/black | 0.210 | 0.178 | 0.227 |
*Mann-Whitney U test for two unrelated samples, significance level at p<0.05 (in bold).
ERP, epithelial rete peg; OD, right eye; OS, left eye; PD, palisade density; PR, palisade ridges.
Repeatability of the measurement procedure
| PD (palisades/mm) | ΔPR (μm) | ΔERP (μm) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inferior limbus | 1.080 | 8.448 | 8.592 |
| Superior limbus | 1.489 | 11.485 | 13.231 |
ERP, epithelial rete peg; PD, palisade density; PR, palisade ridges.
Figure 3Fourier domain-optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) imaging of the inferior limbus of the right cadaveric donor (A). Tissue sections of the scanned region with H&E staining (5×) (B) and composed DAPI—ΔNp63 immunofluorescent labelling (20×) (C). (A) FD-OCT imaging allows visualisation of structures resembling palisade ridges (arrow) and epithelial rete pegs (arrow head) as well as the underlying stroma and endothelium (A). H&E staining of the region of interest corresponds to the image obtained by FD-OCT scanning (B). Immunofluorescent labelling at 20× magnification allows for further identification of structures (figures 3C and 4D–F).
Figure 4Immunofluorescent staining of the scanned inferior limbus (A–F); DAPI stain (A and D); ΔNp63 staining (B and E), merged image DAPI+ΔNp63 (C and F). Magnification: (A–C) 4×; (D–F) 20×. (C and F) are merged pictures of (A) and (B), and (D) and (F), respectively. (B and E): Immunofluorescent labelling identifies ΔNp63-positive cells at the basal epithelial layer of the structures recognised as ERP (arrowhead) and PR (arrow) on Fourier domain-optical coherence tomography. ERP, epithelial rete peg; PR, palisade ridge.