| Literature DB >> 28228296 |
Sharan Shanubhogue1, Thuslima Mohamed2, Nachiket Shankar3.
Abstract
AIMS: The aim of the present study was to determine the variations in the position of the coronary sinus (CS) ostium in normal cadaveric fetal (28 weeks or more) hearts and to assess the impact that these variations had on the dimensions of the triangle of Koch (TK).Entities:
Keywords: Coronary sinus ostium; Near-term fetuses; Triangle of Koch
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28228296 PMCID: PMC5319009 DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2016.07.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian Heart J ISSN: 0019-4832
Fig. 1A superior view photograph of the TK, after opening the anterior wall of the right atrium with a scale for calibration. The sides of the TK using M1 (a) and M2 (b) are marked. a1, b1, c1 – sides of the TK using method 1; a2, b2, c2 – sides of the TK using method 2; M1 – method 1; M2 – method 2.
Fig. 2A superior view photograph of the TK showing the method used to define the position of the CS ostium in relation to the tendon of Todaro. CF – central fibrous body; CS – coronary sinus ostium; SL – septal leaflet of the tricuspid valve; TT – tendon of Todaro; K – line joining the nearest margin of the CS ostium and the central fibrous body; k – angle subtended by K with side a; p – perpendicular drawn from K to side a.
Dimensions of the TOK using M1 and M2.
| Triangle of Koch | M1 | M2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Side – | 9.2 ± 2.2 | 7 ± 2.1 | <0.001 |
| Side – | 6.6 ± 1.8 | 4.7 ± 1.5 | <0.001 |
| Side – | 6 ± 2.4 | 4.8 ± 2.2 | <0.001 |
| Area | 20.4 ± 10.4 | 11.7 ± 6.7 | <0.001 |
Strength of association between the dimensions of the TK before and after adjusting for the position of the CS.
| Triangle of Koch | Correlation coefficient ( | Correlation coefficient ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.844 | <0.001 | 0.530 | 0.035 | |
| 0.819 | <0.001 | 0.687 | 0.003 | |
| 0.945 | <0.001 | 0.814 | <0.001 | |
| Area1 and area2 | 0.894 | <0.001 | 0.758 | 0.001 |
Comparison of the dimensions of TK by M1.
| Authors | Study group | Dimensions of the TOK by M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area | |||||
| Sánchez-Quintana et al. | Perinatal hearts | 9.5 ± 2.6 | 6.1 ± 1.5 | 7.5 ± 1.5 | 25.5 ± 6.5 |
| Present study | Fetal hearts | 9.2 ± 2.2 | 6.6 ± 1.8 | 6 ± 2.4 | 20.4 ± 10.4 |
a, b, c – sides of the TK.
Comparison of the relative difference in dimensions and area of the TK between adult and fetal hearts using M1 and M2.
| Authors | Study group | Relative decrease (%) in mean dimensions and area of TK by M2 as compared to M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area | |||||
| Zhivadinovik et al. | Adults | 18 | 40 | 19 | 52 |
| Present study | Fetal hearts | 22 | 29 | 20 | 43 |
a, b, c – sides of the TK.