Jin Sil Kim1, Hye Young Jang2, Seong Ho Park1, Kyung-Jo Kim3, Kyunghwa Han4, Suk-Kyun Yang3, Byong Duk Ye3, Sang Hyoung Park3, Jong Seok Lee1, Hyun Jin Kim1. 1. 1 Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, South Korea. 2. 2 Department of Radiology, Konyang University College of Medicine, Konyang University Hospital, Daejeon, South Korea. 3. 3 Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea. 4. 4 Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to appraise the use of the MR index of activity (MaRIA) score in evaluating Crohn disease (CD) on present-day MR enterography images, with an emphasis on determining the modifying roles of DWI and the effects of different contrast enhancement phases. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients prospectively underwent MR enterography, including DWI and enteric and portal phase scans, and ileocolonoscopy with segmental CD endoscopic index of severity (CDEIS) scoring within a week. Thirty-nine terminal ilea and 40 right-sided colons (mean [± SD] segmental CDEIS score, 14.3 ± 12.1) from 42 patients with CD (mean age, 27 ± 6.2 years) were finally analyzed by three independent readers. Original and modified (ulcer replaced with DWI grade) MaRIA scores were compared regarding their correlation with segmental CDEIS score, accuracy in diagnosing active (segmental CDEIS score ≥ 3) and severe (segmental CDEIS score ≥ 12) inflammation, and interobserver reproducibility. The primary analysis used portal phase data, and the agreement between portal and enteric phase scores was analyzed. RESULTS: MaRIA and modified MaRIA scores correlated similarly with CDEIS scores (r = 0.737 and 0.742; p = 0.387) and did not significantly differ in terms of AUC values for the diagnosis of active (0.909 and 0.903; p = 0.571) or severe (0.907 and 0.892; p = 0.443) inflammation. The intraclass correlation coefficient was significantly higher for modified MaRIA than for MaRIA (0.845 and 0.701; p < 0.001). The mean difference between portal and enteric phase scores (i.e., portal minus enteric) was 0.33-0.36 score points for individual readers, and the Bland-Altman repeatability coefficient was 0.9-1.42 score points. CONCLUSION: Interobserver reproducibility in evaluating the severity of bowel inflammation in CD using the MaRIA score can be improved by modification with DWI. MaRIA scoring provides steady results across enteric and portal phases.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to appraise the use of the MR index of activity (MaRIA) score in evaluating Crohn disease (CD) on present-day MR enterography images, with an emphasis on determining the modifying roles of DWI and the effects of different contrast enhancement phases. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients prospectively underwent MR enterography, including DWI and enteric and portal phase scans, and ileocolonoscopy with segmental CD endoscopic index of severity (CDEIS) scoring within a week. Thirty-nine terminal ilea and 40 right-sided colons (mean [± SD] segmental CDEIS score, 14.3 ± 12.1) from 42 patients with CD (mean age, 27 ± 6.2 years) were finally analyzed by three independent readers. Original and modified (ulcer replaced with DWI grade) MaRIA scores were compared regarding their correlation with segmental CDEIS score, accuracy in diagnosing active (segmental CDEIS score ≥ 3) and severe (segmental CDEIS score ≥ 12) inflammation, and interobserver reproducibility. The primary analysis used portal phase data, and the agreement between portal and enteric phase scores was analyzed. RESULTS: MaRIA and modified MaRIA scores correlated similarly with CDEIS scores (r = 0.737 and 0.742; p = 0.387) and did not significantly differ in terms of AUC values for the diagnosis of active (0.909 and 0.903; p = 0.571) or severe (0.907 and 0.892; p = 0.443) inflammation. The intraclass correlation coefficient was significantly higher for modified MaRIA than for MaRIA (0.845 and 0.701; p < 0.001). The mean difference between portal and enteric phase scores (i.e., portal minus enteric) was 0.33-0.36 score points for individual readers, and the Bland-Altman repeatability coefficient was 0.9-1.42 score points. CONCLUSION: Interobserver reproducibility in evaluating the severity of bowel inflammation in CD using the MaRIA score can be improved by modification with DWI. MaRIA scoring provides steady results across enteric and portal phases.
Authors: Saurabh Kedia; Raju Sharma; Govind K Makharia; Vineet Ahuja; Devendra Desai; Devasenathipathy Kandasamy; Anu Eapen; Karthik Ganesan; Uday C Ghoshal; Naveen Kalra; D Karthikeyan; Kumble Seetharama Madhusudhan; Mathew Philip; Amarender Singh Puri; Sunil Puri; Saroj K Sinha; Rupa Banerjee; Shobna Bhatia; Naresh Bhat; Sunil Dadhich; G K Dhali; B D Goswami; S K Issar; V Jayanthi; S P Misra; Sandeep Nijhawan; Pankaj Puri; Avik Sarkar; S P Singh; Anshu Srivastava; Philip Abraham; B S Ramakrishna Journal: Indian J Gastroenterol Date: 2018-01-06
Authors: Ji Eun Park; Kyunghwa Han; Yu Sub Sung; Mi Sun Chung; Hyun Jung Koo; Hee Mang Yoon; Young Jun Choi; Seung Soo Lee; Kyung Won Kim; Youngbin Shin; Suah An; Hyo-Min Cho; Seong Ho Park Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: James Gauci; Lara Sammut; Martina Sciberras; Naomi Piscopo; Kristian Micallef; Kelvin Cortis; Pierre Ellul Journal: Ann Gastroenterol Date: 2018-05-04