Literature DB >> 28225581

Effect of Sonication Duration and Power on Ablation Depth During MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound of Bone.

Matthew D Bucknor1, Eugene Ozhinsky1, Rutwik Shah1, Roland Krug1, Viola Rieke1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of differences in sonication duration and power on the size of postcontrast ablation zone following magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) of bone in a swine femoral bone model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experimental procedures received approval from the Institutional Committee on Animal Research. MRgFUS was used to create two thermal lesions in the left femur of six pigs. Each target was subjected to six sonications. 400J of energy was used for each sonication. However, the distal target received the standard sonication duration of 20 seconds (20W), while the proximal target received a longer sonication duration of 40 seconds (10W). MRgFUS lesions were imaged with fat-saturated spoiled gradient echo sequence at 3.0T MRI 10 minutes following the administration of contrast. Maximum three-plane dimensions of the hypoenhanced ablation area were measured.
RESULTS: Postcontrast MR images demonstrated ovoid regions of hypoenhancement at each target. The average depth of ablation was significantly greater for the shorter high-power sonications (7.3 mm), compared to the longer lower-power sonications (4.5 mm), P = 0.026. The craniocaudal dimension was also greater for the shorter ablations 26.7 mm compared to the longer sonications 21.0 mm, P = 0.006.
CONCLUSION: Contrary to anecdotal clinical experience, this preclinical model suggests that during MRgFUS of bone, standard duration, higher-power sonications resulted in deeper ablation volumes compared to long duration, lower-power sonications. These results suggest that to achieve deeper ablations, if longer sonications are used, then the power should be relatively maintained, for a net energy increase. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 5 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;46:1418-1422.
© 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MR-guided focused ultrasound; MRI; bone ablation; high intensity focused ultrasound

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28225581     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  3 in total

Review 1.  Cytoreduction for colorectal metastases: liver, lung, peritoneum, lymph nodes, bone, brain. When does it palliate, prolong survival, and potentially cure?

Authors:  Camille L Stewart; Susanne Warner; Kaori Ito; Mustafa Raoof; Geena X Wu; Jonathan Kessler; Jae Y Kim; Yuman Fong
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 1.909

2.  Bone remodeling following MR-guided focused ultrasound: Evaluation with HR-pQCT and FTIR.

Authors:  Matthew D Bucknor; Harsh Goel; Courtney Pasco; Andrew E Horvai; Galateia J Kazakia
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Mild hyperthermia by MR-guided focused ultrasound in an ex vivo model of osteolytic bone tumour: optimization of the spatio-temporal control of the delivered temperature.

Authors:  Pauline C Guillemin; Laura Gui; Orane Lorton; Thomas Zilli; Lindsey A Crowe; Stéphane Desgranges; Xavier Montet; Sylvain Terraz; Raymond Miralbell; Rares Salomir; Sana Boudabbous
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 5.531

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.