Literature DB >> 28224780

Two Cases of Antibody-Mediated Rejection Following Kidney Transplantation due to HLA-DQB1 Allele-Specific and DQ Alpha Protein-Specific HLA Antibodies.

Seung Hwan Song1, Borae G Park2,3, Beom Seok Kim4, Yu Seun Kim1, Hyon Suk Kim3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28224780      PMCID: PMC5339106          DOI: 10.3343/alm.2017.37.3.290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Lab Med        ISSN: 2234-3806            Impact factor:   3.464


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, The HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DR loci have been used for transplant candidate matching. Recent studies using single antigen bead-based assays (SABAs) have revealed that HLA-DQ donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSHAs) are associated with inferior allograft outcomes [12]. Therefore, donor HLA-DQ typing prior to transplantation is now thought to be highly important. HLA-DQ antigen typing is determined by HLA-DQB1 genotyping. The HLA-DQ antigen is composed of two alpha protein domains, coded by the DQA1 gene, and two beta protein domains, coded by the DQB1 gene. HLA-DQ antigen Luminex SABA beads are coated with both DQ alpha and DQ beta proteins. Therefore, DQ alpha proteins are taken into account in the interpretation of HLA-DQ antibody reactions. However, the clinical significance of DQ alpha-specific DSHA is questionable. In addition, although the clinical significance of allele-specific DSHAs has been established, the routine application of high-resolution HLA genotyping remains controversial [345]. We report two representative cases of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) following kidney transplantation (KT) due to HLA-DQB1 allele-specific DSHA and DQ alpha protein-specific DSHA. HLA typing assays for detecting the HLA-A, -B, -DRB1, and -DQB1 loci were performed by using Luminex technology and LIFECODES HLA SSO typing kits (Immucor Transplant Technology, Stamford, CT, USA). High-resolution HLA-DQB1 and DQA1 typing results were achieved through direct sequencing of exons 2, 3 of the HLA-DQB1 gene and exons 1, 2, 3, 4 of the HLA-DQA1 gene, using the ABI PRISM 3100 Genetic analyser (Applied Biosystems, Hitachi, Japan). SABAs were performed by using two commercially available Luminex assays (LIFECODES Single Antigen Class I/II [Immucor Transplant Technology] and LABScreen Single Antigen Class I and II [One Lambda, Canoga Park, CA, USA]) and the C1q assay (C1q Screen; One Lambda) was performed to determine DSHA status.

CASE 1

21-yr-old woman with end-stage renal disease caused by lupus nephritis received a KT from her mother with 0% calculated panel reactive antibody (PRA) in February 2010. Four years following the KT, serum creatinine levels increased to 2.32 mg/dL and a biopsy of the allograft kidney revealed active ABMR with diffusely positive deposition of C4d, g3 (glomerulitis, score 3), and ptc3 (peritubular capillaritis, score 3). At the time of rejection, only HLA-DQ6 class II HLA antibodies were identified by SABA. No HLA-DQ mismatch was revealed by antigen-level typing. Therefore, high-resolution HLA-DQB1 and DQA1 typing were performed and an HLA-DQB1 allele-specific DSHA was identified. The C1q assay revealed positive C1q fixing for HLA-DQB1 DSHA (Table 1).
Table 1

HLA typing and antibody reaction results for case 1 (HLA-DQB1 allele-specific DSHA)

HLA typingABCDRB1DQB1DQA1
Recipient11, 2644, 6205, 0904, 1304:01 (DQ4), 06:03 (DQ6)01:03, 03:03
Donor (mother)11, 2639, 4405, 0708, 1306:01 (DQ6), 06:03 (DQ6)01:03, 01:03
Antibody reactions by SABA
HLA-DQB1 and -DQA1 specificity of HLA-DQ beadsRaw MFI from ImmucorBaseline MFI from One LambdaBaseline MFI for C1q assay
DQB1*06:01 (DQ6)-DQA1*01:0311,9417,11114,633
DQB1*06:01 (DQ6)-DQA1*02:0111,827NANA
DQB1*06:01 (DQ6)-DQA1*01:0410,761NANA
DQB1*06:09 (DQ6)-DQA1*01:02NA6,1550
DQB1*06:02 (DQ6)-DQA1*01:01NA3140
DQB1*06:03 (DQ6)-DQA1*01:03NA0
DQB1*06:04 (DQ6)-DQA1*01:023,2335910

Abbreviations: DSHA, donor-specific HLA antibody; SABA, single antigen bead assay; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; NA, not applicable.

CASE 2

A 23-yr-old woman with end-stage renal disease caused by IgA nephropathy received a KT with 0% calculated PRA from her mother in August 2011. Three years later, her creatinine level increased to 2.24 mg/dL, and a biopsy of the allograft kidney revealed active T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR). Four months later, the creatinine level increased to 6.17 mg/dL, and the allograft biopsy revealed TCMR with active ABMR, grade II with C4d negative, g1, and ptc3. Several class II HLA antibodies were identified by SABA. Both donor and recipient's HLA-DQ antigens were identified as HLA-DQ5 and DQ7. However, the HLA-DQ7 antibody reactions in serum were positive against two of the three Immucor DQ7 beads and three of five One Lambda beads. High-resolution HLA-DQB1 and DQA1 typing revealed donor HLA-DQA1 that was different from patient HLA-DQA1 gene. The HLA antibody reactions were positive for HLA-DQA1, DQA1, DQA1, DQA1, and DQA1; these alleles share a confirmed epitope, 40GR3 (40G 41R 45V 47C 48L 50V 51L 52R 53Q 54F 55R, according to the HLA epitope registry). Therefore, the recipient antibody reaction was identified as HLA-DQA1-specific DSHA (Table 2).
Table 2

HLA typing and antibody reaction results for case 2 (HLA-DQA1-specific DSHA)

HLA typingABDRB1DQB1DQA1
Recipient02, 3348, 6112, 1403:01 (DQ7), 05:03 (DQ5)01:04, 05:08
Donor (mother)02, 2648, 5512, 1403:01 (DQ7), 05:03 (DQ5)01:04, 06:01
Antibody reactions by SABA
HLA-DQB1 and -DQA1 specificity of HLA-DQ beadsRaw MFI from ImmucorBaseline MFI from One Lambda
DQB1*02:01 (DQ2)-DQA1*04:01NA3,867
DQB1*03:03 (DQ9)-DQA1*04:013,004NA
DQB1*04:02 (DQ4)-DQA1*04:012,8335,219
DQB1*04:01 (DQ4)-DQA1*04:012,599NA
DQB1*02:01 (DQ2)-DQA1*05:011,3234,626
DQB1*02:02 (DQ2)-DQA1*05:011,450NA
DQB1*04:01 (DQ4)-DQA1*05:012,003NA
DQB1*03:01 (DQ7)-DQA1*02:01NANegative
DQB1*03:01 (DQ7)-DQA1*03:01NANegative
DQB1*03:01 (DQ7)-DQA1*03:02NegativeNA
DQB1*03:01 (DQ7)-DQA1*05:012,993NA
DQB1*03:01 (DQ7)-DQA1*05:03NA4,627
DQB1*03:01 (DQ7)-DQA1*05:05NA3,174
DQB1*03:01 (DQ7)-DQA1*06:012,5384,591
DQB1*03:03 (DQ9)-DQA1*06:012,386NA
DQB1*04:02 (DQ4)-DQA1*06:012,075NA

Abbreviations: see Table 1.

HLA antibodies against DQ alpha antigens are observed in up to 79% of highly sensitized patients [5]. HLA-DQ antibodies show activity against both DQ alpha and beta proteins; however, their specific reactions against each type of protein cannot be easily differentiated. Our second case did not exhibit HLA antibodies prior to KT; however, HLA-DQ alpha protein-specific DSHA developed four years after transplantation, and the allograft biopsy revealed C4d negative ABMR. Allele-specific DSHAs have been reported to have clinical significances [4]. However, only one of 67 crossmatches was positive for allele-specific DSHAs [6]. Therefore, the clinical significance of these DSHAs requires further investigation. Our two cases showed biopsy-proven ABMR due to HLA-DQB1 allele-specific DSHA and DQ alpha protein-specific DSHA. Although HLA-DQ typing is not included in routine HLA antigen-matching strategies, it must be performed to evaluate DSHA following KT. In addition, high-resolution HLA-DQB1 and DQA1 typing results should be considered when necessary for the interpretation of DSHAs in SABA.
  6 in total

1.  HLA high-resolution typing for sensitized patients: a solution in search of a problem?

Authors:  J M Cecka; E F Reed; A A Zachary
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 2.  Anti-human leukocyte antigen DQ antibodies in renal transplantation: Are we underestimating the most frequent donor specific alloantibodies?

Authors:  Paolo Carta; Lorenzo Di Maria; Leonardo Caroti; Elisa Buti; Giulia Antognoli; Enrico Eugenio Minetti
Journal:  Transplant Rev (Orlando)       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.943

3.  De novo DQ donor-specific antibodies are associated with a significant risk of antibody-mediated rejection and transplant glomerulopathy.

Authors:  Michelle Willicombe; Paul Brookes; Ruhena Sergeant; Eva Santos-Nunez; Corinna Steggar; Jack Galliford; Adam McLean; Terence H Cook; Tom Cairns; Candice Roufosse; David Taube
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Center-defined unacceptable HLA antigens facilitate transplants for sensitized patients in a multi-center kidney exchange program.

Authors:  L A Baxter-Lowe; M Cecka; M Kamoun; J Sinacore; M L Melcher
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  How did a patient who types for HLA-B*4403 develop antibodies that react with HLA-B*4402?

Authors:  Jon Lomago; Larry Jelenik; Dwayne Zern; Judy Howe; Joan Martell; Adriana Zeevi; Rene J Duquesnoy
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.850

6.  The DQ barrier: improving organ allocation equity using HLA-DQ information.

Authors:  Anat R Tambur; Joseph R Leventhal; Jennifer R Zitzner; R Carlin Walsh; John J Friedewald
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 4.939

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Clinical impact of complement (C1q, C3d) binding De Novo donor-specific HLA antibody in kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Hyeyoung Lee; Eunhee Han; Ae-Ran Choi; Tae Hyun Ban; Byung Ha Chung; Chul Woo Yang; Yeong Jin Choi; Eun-Jee Oh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.