Literature DB >> 28224628

Quality of life of patients who underwent aesthetic rhinoplasty: 100 cases assessed with the Glascow Benefit Inventory.

Dimitrios Kotzampasakis1, Anastasia Piniara1, Sotirios Themelis1, Stylianos Kotzampasakis2, Eustratios Gabriel3, Nikos Maroudias1, Thomas Nikolopoulos4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of the present study is to assess the long-term effect of classic rhinoplasty on patients' quality of life. STUDY
DESIGN: Outcomes research.
METHODS: The study included 100 operated patients; there were 34 males and 66 females. The ages ranged between 23 and 57 years old, with a mean of 36.4 years. A minimum of 3 years between the operation and the study was selected to assess the long-term effect of the operation on the patients' quality of life and exclude any short-term impressions. The time elapsed between surgery and the time of the study ranged from 3 to 13 years, with a mean of 6.8 years. Patients were assessed using the Glasgow Benefit Inventory, which has been proven valid and reliable in ear, nose, and throat interventions.
RESULTS: From the 100 patients included in the study, 92 reported improvement in their quality of life due to the operation and only eight worsening. In the social support subscale, 97 patients reported better quality of life, and only three patients reported worse quality of life. The patients' overall life markedly improved, reaching a mean of 80% in the Glasgow Benefit Inventory.
CONCLUSIONS: The present long-term study using a validated and reliable instrument concludes that rhinoplasty improves the quality of life of patients in all sectors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2c Laryngoscope, 127:2017-2025, 2017.
© 2017 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Facial; aesthetic; rhinoplasty; surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28224628     DOI: 10.1002/lary.26517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  3 in total

1.  Categorization and Analysis of Nasal Base Shapes Using a Parametric Model.

Authors:  Alisa Zhukhovitskaya; Dalan Cragun; Erica Su; Christian H Barnes; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 4.611

2.  Assessment of Casual Observers' Willingness to Pay for Increased Attractiveness Through Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  David Chen; Masaru Ishii; Jason Nellis; Kristin Bater; Halley Darrach; David Liao; Andrew Joseph; Patrick Byrne; Kofi Boahene; Ira Papel; Theda Kontis; Lisa E Ishii
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 4.611

3.  Assessment of Aesthetic Results of 100 Patients Who Underwent Rhinoplasty-Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation.

Authors:  Dimitrios Kotzampasakis; Panagiotis Mantalos; Stylianos Kotzampasakis; Nikolaos Danias; Thomas Nikolopoulos
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-09-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.