Jonathan David Kosy1, Vipul I Mandalia2. 1. ST8 Registrar in Trauma and Orthopaedics, Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Barrack Road, Exeter, EX2 5DW, UK. jonkosy@yahoo.co.uk. 2. Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon with Specialist Interest in Knee Surgery, Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, EX2 5DW, UK.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The position of the osseous tunnels and graft during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been the subject of multiple studies aiming for either anatomical placement or an alternative. The assessment of these positions, using post-operative imaging, is therefore of interest to the surgeon in both the evaluation of surgical performance and surveillance of potential complications. The purpose of this review is to identify the optimal use of imaging in both the surveillance of clinical practice and in planning revision surgery. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic review was performed using Medline and Pubmed searches to identify radiological methods used to assess ACL reconstruction tunnel position. Commonly used methods were identified with correlation to either native anatomy or clinical results. RESULTS: The findings suggest that plain radiographs can be used to assess tunnel position and identify grafts that are positioned non-anatomically and may be at increased risk of complications. Computer tomography (CT) offers additional information about the tunnel aperture shape and size that is of importance for revision surgery and research projects whilst magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides further assessment of both graft integrity and associated soft tissue damage. CONCLUSION: In the surveillance of routine clinical practice, plain radiographs are sufficient to define tunnel position. The additional information provided by three-dimensional imaging is only required in revision surgery or research studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
PURPOSE: The position of the osseous tunnels and graft during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been the subject of multiple studies aiming for either anatomical placement or an alternative. The assessment of these positions, using post-operative imaging, is therefore of interest to the surgeon in both the evaluation of surgical performance and surveillance of potential complications. The purpose of this review is to identify the optimal use of imaging in both the surveillance of clinical practice and in planning revision surgery. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic review was performed using Medline and Pubmed searches to identify radiological methods used to assess ACL reconstruction tunnel position. Commonly used methods were identified with correlation to either native anatomy or clinical results. RESULTS: The findings suggest that plain radiographs can be used to assess tunnel position and identify grafts that are positioned non-anatomically and may be at increased risk of complications. Computer tomography (CT) offers additional information about the tunnel aperture shape and size that is of importance for revision surgery and research projects whilst magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides further assessment of both graft integrity and associated soft tissue damage. CONCLUSION: In the surveillance of routine clinical practice, plain radiographs are sufficient to define tunnel position. The additional information provided by three-dimensional imaging is only required in revision surgery or research studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Authors: Jae Gyoon Kim; Min Ho Chang; Hong Chul Lim; Ji Hoon Bae; Jin Hwan Ahn; Joon Ho Wang Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2013-08-27 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Michael G Azzam; Christopher J Lenarz; Lutul D Farrow; Heidi A Israel; David A Kieffer; Scott G Kaar Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2011-01-22 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Bryan A Warme; Austin J Ramme; Michael C Willey; Carla L Britton; John H Flint; Annunziato S Amendola; Brian R Wolf Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2012-03-03 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: A A Amis; B Beynnon; L Blankevoort; P Chambat; P Christel; L Durselen; N Friederich; E Grood; P Hertel; R Jakob Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 1994 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Gene Kitamura; Marcio Bottene Villa Albers; Bryson P Lesniak; Stephen Joseph Rabuck; Volker Musahl; Carol L Andrews; Anish Ghodadra; Freddie Fu Journal: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Date: 2019-09-26