D A Slattery1, J F Cryan2. 1. Laboratory of Translational Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Heinrich-Hoffmann-Str. 10, 60528, Frankfurt, Germany. david.slattery@kgu.de. 2. APC Microbiome Institute, Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Despite substantial research efforts the aetiology of major depressive disorder (MDD) remains poorly understood, which is due in part to the heterogeneity of the disorder and the complexity of designing appropriate animal models. However, in the last few decades, a focus on the development of novel stress-based paradigms and a focus on using hedonic/anhedonic behaviour have led to renewed optimism in the use of animal models to assess aspects of MDD. OBJECTIVES: Therefore, in this review article, dedicated to Athina Markou, we summarise the use of stress-based animal models for studying MDD in rodents and how reward-related readouts can be used to validate/assess the model and/or treatment. RESULTS: We reveal the use and limitations of chronic stress paradigms, which we split into non-social (i.e. chronic mild stress), social (i.e. chronic social defeat) and drug-withdrawal paradigms for studying MDD and detail numerous reward-related readouts that are employed in preclinical research. Finally, we finish with a section regarding important factors to consider when using animal models. CONCLUSIONS: One of the most consistent findings following chronic stress exposure in rodents is a disruption of the brain reward system, which can be easily assessed using sucrose, social interaction, food, drug of abuse or intracranial self-stimulation as a readout. Probing the underlying causes of such alterations is providing a greater understanding of the potential systems and processes that are disrupted in MDD.
RATIONALE: Despite substantial research efforts the aetiology of major depressive disorder (MDD) remains poorly understood, which is due in part to the heterogeneity of the disorder and the complexity of designing appropriate animal models. However, in the last few decades, a focus on the development of novel stress-based paradigms and a focus on using hedonic/anhedonic behaviour have led to renewed optimism in the use of animal models to assess aspects of MDD. OBJECTIVES: Therefore, in this review article, dedicated to Athina Markou, we summarise the use of stress-based animal models for studying MDD in rodents and how reward-related readouts can be used to validate/assess the model and/or treatment. RESULTS: We reveal the use and limitations of chronic stress paradigms, which we split into non-social (i.e. chronic mild stress), social (i.e. chronic social defeat) and drug-withdrawal paradigms for studying MDD and detail numerous reward-related readouts that are employed in preclinical research. Finally, we finish with a section regarding important factors to consider when using animal models. CONCLUSIONS: One of the most consistent findings following chronic stress exposure in rodents is a disruption of the brain reward system, which can be easily assessed using sucrose, social interaction, food, drug of abuse or intracranial self-stimulation as a readout. Probing the underlying causes of such alterations is providing a greater understanding of the potential systems and processes that are disrupted in MDD.
Entities:
Keywords:
Anhedonia; Drug withdrawal; ICSS; Microbiome; Stress; Sucrose; Susceptible
Authors: Nikolaos P Daskalakis; Rosemary C Bagot; Karen J Parker; Christiaan H Vinkers; E R de Kloet Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2013-07-07 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Andrew T Drysdale; Logan Grosenick; Jonathan Downar; Katharine Dunlop; Farrokh Mansouri; Yue Meng; Robert N Fetcho; Benjamin Zebley; Desmond J Oathes; Amit Etkin; Alan F Schatzberg; Keith Sudheimer; Jennifer Keller; Helen S Mayberg; Faith M Gunning; George S Alexopoulos; Michael D Fox; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Henning U Voss; B J Casey; Marc J Dubin; Conor Liston Journal: Nat Med Date: 2016-12-05 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Stefan O Reber; Philip H Siebler; Nina C Donner; James T Morton; David G Smith; Jared M Kopelman; Kenneth R Lowe; Kristen J Wheeler; James H Fox; James E Hassell; Benjamin N Greenwood; Charline Jansch; Anja Lechner; Dominic Schmidt; Nicole Uschold-Schmidt; Andrea M Füchsl; Dominik Langgartner; Frederick R Walker; Matthew W Hale; Gerardo Lopez Perez; Will Van Treuren; Antonio González; Andrea L Halweg-Edwards; Monika Fleshner; Charles L Raison; Graham A Rook; Shyamal D Peddada; Rob Knight; Christopher A Lowry Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-05-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Siobhain M O'Mahony; Julian R Marchesi; Paul Scully; Caroline Codling; Anne-Marie Ceolho; Eamonn M M Quigley; John F Cryan; Timothy G Dinan Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2008-08-23 Impact factor: 13.382