Literature DB >> 28223290

Nephrologists' Perspectives on Defining and Applying Patient-Centered Outcomes in Hemodialysis.

Allison Tong1,2, Wolfgang C Winkelmayer3, David C Wheeler4, Wim van Biesen5, Peter Tugwell6, Braden Manns7,8, Brenda Hemmelgarn7,8, Tess Harris9, Sally Crowe10, Angela Ju11,2, Emma O'Lone11,2, Nicole Evangelidis11,2, Jonathan C Craig11,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patient centeredness is widely advocated as a cornerstone of health care, but it is yet to be fully realized, including in nephrology. Our study aims to describe nephrologists' perspectives on defining and implementing patient-centered outcomes in hemodialysis. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Face-to-face, semistructured interviews were conducted with 58 nephrologists from 27 dialysis units across nine countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Singapore, and New Zealand. Transcripts were thematically analyzed.
RESULTS: We identified five themes on defining and implementing patient-centered outcomes in hemodialysis: explicitly prioritized by patients (articulated preferences and goals, ascertaining treatment burden, defining hemodialysis success, distinguishing a physician-patient dichotomy, and supporting shared decision making), optimizing wellbeing (respecting patient choice, focusing on symptomology, perceptible and tangible, and judging relevance and consequence), comprehending extensive heterogeneity of clinical and quality of life outcomes (distilling diverse priorities, highly individualized, attempting to specify outcomes, and broadening context), clinically hamstrung (professional deficiency, uncertainty and complexity in measurement, beyond medical purview, specificity of care, mechanistic mindset [focused on biochemical targets and comorbidities], avoiding alarm, and paradoxical dilemma), and undermined by system pressures (adhering to overarching policies, misalignment with mandates, and resource constraints).
CONCLUSIONS: Improving patient-centered outcomes is regarded by nephrologists to encompass strategies that address patient goals and improve wellbeing and treatment burden in patients on hemodialysis. However, efforts are hampered by ambiguities about how to prioritize, measure, and manage the plethora of critical comorbidities and broader quality of life outcomes in a care setting that is technically demanding and driven by biochemical targets. Identifying critical patient-important outcomes and mechanisms for integrating them into practice may help to deliver patient-centered care in hemodialysis and other chronic disease settings.
Copyright © 2017 by the American Society of Nephrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Australia; Austria; Belgium; Canada; Chronic Disease; Comorbidity; Decision Making; Germany; Goals; Great Britain; Humans; New Zealand; Patient Selection; Patient-Centered Care; Physician-Patient Relations; Singapore; Uncertainty; United States; hemodialysis; nephrology; qualitative research; quality of life; renal dialysis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28223290      PMCID: PMC5338715          DOI: 10.2215/CJN.08370816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1555-9041            Impact factor:   8.237


  58 in total

1.  Medscape's response to the Institute of Medicine Report: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.

Authors:  M Leavitt
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2001-03-05

2.  A systems approach to patient-centered care.

Authors:  Steven C Bergeson; John D Dean
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Excerpts from the United States Renal Data System 2007 annual data report.

Authors:  Allan J Collins; Robert Foley; Charles Herzog; Blanche Chavers; David Gilbertson; Areef Ishani; Bertram Kasiske; Jiannong Liu; Lih-Wen Mau; Marshall McBean; Anne Murray; Wendy St Peter; Jay Xue; Qiao Fan; Haifeng Guo; Qi Li; Shuling Li; Suying Li; Yi Peng; Yang Qiu; Tricia Roberts; Melissa Skeans; Jon Snyder; Craig Solid; Changchun Wang; Eric Weinhandl; David Zaun; Rui Zhang; Cheryl Arko; Shu-Cheng Chen; Frederick Dalleska; Frank Daniels; Stephan Dunning; James Ebben; Eric Frazier; Christopher Hanzlik; Roger Johnson; Daniel Sheets; Xinyue Wang; Beth Forrest; Edward Constantini; Susan Everson; Paul Eggers; Lawrence Agodoa
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 8.860

4.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

Authors:  Allison Tong; Peter Sainsbury; Jonathan Craig
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.038

5.  A 2020 vision of patient-centered primary care.

Authors:  Karen Davis; Stephen C Schoenbaum; Anne-Marie Audet
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  The moral nature of patient-centeredness: is it "just the right thing to do"?

Authors:  Patrick S Duggan; Gail Geller; Lisa A Cooper; Mary Catherine Beach
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2005-12-13

7.  Adoption of patient-centered care practices by physicians: results from a national survey.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Audet; Karen Davis; Stephen C Schoenbaum
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-04-10

8.  Association of comorbid conditions and mortality in hemodialysis patients in Europe, Japan, and the United States: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS).

Authors:  David A Goodkin; Jennifer L Bragg-Gresham; Karl G Koenig; Robert A Wolfe; Takashi Akiba; Vittorio E Andreucci; Akira Saito; Hugh C Rayner; Kiyoshi Kurokawa; Friedrich K Port; Philip J Held; Eric W Young
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 10.121

9.  The end of the disease era.

Authors:  Mary E Tinetti; Terri Fried
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  19 in total

1.  When All You Have Is a Hammer: The Need for Tools to Define and Apply Patient-Centered Outcomes in Hemodialysis.

Authors:  C Barrett Bowling; Laura C Plantinga
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  An international Delphi survey helped develop consensus-based core outcome domains for trials in peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Karine E Manera; Allison Tong; Jonathan C Craig; Jenny Shen; Shilpa Jesudason; Yeoungjee Cho; Benedicte Sautenet; Armando Teixeira-Pinto; Martin Howell; Angela Yee-Moon Wang; Edwina A Brown; Gillian Brunier; Jeffrey Perl; Jie Dong; Martin Wilkie; Rajnish Mehrotra; Roberto Pecoits-Filho; Saraladevi Naicker; Tony Dunning; Nicole Scholes-Robertson; David W Johnson
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 10.612

3.  Frailty, Age, and Postdialysis Recovery Time in a Population New to Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Jessica Fitzpatrick; Stephen M Sozio; Bernard G Jaar; Michelle M Estrella; Dorry L Segev; Tariq Shafi; Jose M Monroy-Trujillo; Rulan S Parekh; Mara A McAdams-DeMarco
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2021-07-13

4.  Standardised Outcomes in Nephrology-Polycystic Kidney Disease (SONG-PKD): study protocol for establishing a core outcome set in polycystic kidney disease.

Authors:  Yeoungjee Cho; Benedicte Sautenet; Gopala Rangan; Jonathan C Craig; Albert C M Ong; Arlene Chapman; Curie Ahn; Dongping Chen; Helen Coolican; Juliana Tze-Wah Kao; Ron Gansevoort; Ronald Perrone; Tess Harris; Vicente Torres; York Pei; Peter G Kerr; Jessica Ryan; Talia Gutman; Martin Howell; Angela Ju; Karine E Manera; Armando Teixeira-Pinto; Lorraine A Hamiwka; Allison Tong
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Clinicians' and researchers' perspectives on establishing and implementing core outcomes in haemodialysis: semistructured interview study.

Authors:  Allison Tong; Sally Crowe; John S Gill; Tess Harris; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Braden Manns; Roberto Pecoits-Filho; Peter Tugwell; Wim van Biesen; Angela Yee Moon Wang; David C Wheeler; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Talia Gutman; Angela Ju; Emma O'Lone; Benedicte Sautenet; Andrea Viecelli; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Feasibility of Tablet-Based Patient-Reported Symptom Data Collection Among Hemodialysis Patients.

Authors:  Jennifer E Flythe; Matthew J Tugman; Julia H Narendra; Adeline Dorough; Johnathan Hilbert; Magdalene M Assimon; Darren A DeWalt
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2020-04-29

7.  Use of Electronic Patient Reported Outcomes in Clinical Nephrology Practice: A Qualitative Pilot Study.

Authors:  Kara Schick-Makaroff; Kaitlyn Tate; Anita Molzahn
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2019-09-30

8.  An Evidence-Based Theory About PRO Use in Kidney Care: A Realist Synthesis.

Authors:  Kara Schick-Makaroff; Adrienne Levay; Stephanie Thompson; Rachel Flynn; Richard Sawatzky; Onouma Thummapol; Scott Klarenbach; Mehri Karimi-Dehkordi; Joanne Greenhalgh
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 9.  Shared decision-making in hemodialysis vascular access practice.

Authors:  Mariana Murea; Carl R Grey; Charmaine E Lok
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 18.998

10.  An Exploratory Study of Person-Centered Care in a Large Urban Hemodialysis Program in Canada Using a Qualitative Case-Study Methodology.

Authors:  Rachel A Lewis; Karen M Benzies; Jennifer MacRae; Chandra Thomas; Marcello Tonelli
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2019-09-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.