David B Nelson1, Donald D McIntire2, Jeffrey McDonald3, John Gard4, Paula Turrichi4, Kenneth J Leveno2. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. Electronic address: DavidB.Nelson@utsouthwestern.edu. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. 3. Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. 4. Women and Infant Services, Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, TX.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: 17-alpha Hydroxyprogesterone caproate for prevention of recurrent preterm birth is recommended for use in the United States. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the clinical effectiveness of 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate to prevent recurrent preterm birth ≤35 weeks compared to similar births in our obstetric population prior to the implementation of 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective cohort study of 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate in our obstetric population. The primary outcome was the recurrence of birth ≤35 weeks for the entire study cohort compared to a historical referent rate of 16.8% of recurrent preterm birth in our population. There were 3 secondary outcomes. First, did 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate modify a woman's history of preterm birth when taking into account her prior number and sequence of preterm and term births? Second, was recurrence of preterm birth related to 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate plasma concentration? Third, was duration of pregnancy modified by 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate treatment compared to a prior preterm birth? RESULTS: From January 2012 through March 2016, 430 consecutive women with prior births ≤35 weeks were treated with 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate. Nearly two thirds of the women (N = 267) began injections ≤18 weeks and 394 (92%) received a scheduled weekly injection within 10 days of reaching 35 weeks or delivery. The overall rate of recurrent preterm birth was 25% (N = 106) for the entire cohort compared to the 16.8% expected rate (P = 1.0). The 3 secondary outcomes were also negative. First, 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate did not significantly reduce the rates of recurrence regardless of prior preterm birth number or sequence. Second, plasma concentrations of 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate were not different (P = .17 at 24 weeks; P = .38 at 32 weeks) between women delivered ≤35 weeks and those delivered later in pregnancy. Third, the mean (±SD) interval in weeks of recurrent preterm birth before 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate use was 0.4 ± 5.3 weeks and the interval of recurrent preterm birth after 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate treatment was 0.1 ± 4.7 weeks (P = .63). A side effect of weekly 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate injections was an increase in gestational diabetes. Specifically, the rate of gestational diabetes was 13.4% in 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate-treated women compared to 8% in case-matched controls (P = .001). CONCLUSION: 17-alpha Hydroxyprogesterone caproate was ineffective for prevention of recurrent preterm birth and was associated with an increased rate of gestational diabetes.
BACKGROUND:17-alpha Hydroxyprogesterone caproate for prevention of recurrent preterm birth is recommended for use in the United States. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the clinical effectiveness of 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate to prevent recurrent preterm birth ≤35 weeks compared to similar births in our obstetric population prior to the implementation of 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective cohort study of 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate in our obstetric population. The primary outcome was the recurrence of birth ≤35 weeks for the entire study cohort compared to a historical referent rate of 16.8% of recurrent preterm birth in our population. There were 3 secondary outcomes. First, did 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate modify a woman's history of preterm birth when taking into account her prior number and sequence of preterm and term births? Second, was recurrence of preterm birth related to 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate plasma concentration? Third, was duration of pregnancy modified by 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate treatment compared to a prior preterm birth? RESULTS: From January 2012 through March 2016, 430 consecutive women with prior births ≤35 weeks were treated with 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate. Nearly two thirds of the women (N = 267) began injections ≤18 weeks and 394 (92%) received a scheduled weekly injection within 10 days of reaching 35 weeks or delivery. The overall rate of recurrent preterm birth was 25% (N = 106) for the entire cohort compared to the 16.8% expected rate (P = 1.0). The 3 secondary outcomes were also negative. First, 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate did not significantly reduce the rates of recurrence regardless of prior preterm birth number or sequence. Second, plasma concentrations of 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate were not different (P = .17 at 24 weeks; P = .38 at 32 weeks) between women delivered ≤35 weeks and those delivered later in pregnancy. Third, the mean (±SD) interval in weeks of recurrent preterm birth before 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate use was 0.4 ± 5.3 weeks and the interval of recurrent preterm birth after 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate treatment was 0.1 ± 4.7 weeks (P = .63). A side effect of weekly 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate injections was an increase in gestational diabetes. Specifically, the rate of gestational diabetes was 13.4% in 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate-treated women compared to 8% in case-matched controls (P = .001). CONCLUSION:17-alpha Hydroxyprogesterone caproate was ineffective for prevention of recurrent preterm birth and was associated with an increased rate of gestational diabetes.
Authors: Christopher Nold; Monique Maubert; Lauren Anton; Steven Yellon; Michal A Elovitz Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Rachel E Sherman; Steven A Anderson; Gerald J Dal Pan; Gerry W Gray; Thomas Gross; Nina L Hunter; Lisa LaVange; Danica Marinac-Dabic; Peter W Marks; Melissa A Robb; Jeffrey Shuren; Robert Temple; Janet Woodcock; Lilly Q Yue; Robert M Califf Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-12-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tracy A Manuck; W Scott Watkins; Barry Moore; M Sean Esplin; Michael W Varner; G Marc Jackson; Mark Yandell; Lynn Jorde Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2014-03-01 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Fernando Althabe; José M Belizán; Elizabeth M McClure; Jennifer Hemingway-Foday; Mabel Berrueta; Agustina Mazzoni; Alvaro Ciganda; Shivaprasad S Goudar; Bhalachandra S Kodkany; Niranjana S Mahantshetti; Sangappa M Dhaded; Geetanjali M Katageri; Mrityunjay C Metgud; Anjali M Joshi; Mrutyunjaya B Bellad; Narayan V Honnungar; Richard J Derman; Sarah Saleem; Omrana Pasha; Sumera Ali; Farid Hasnain; Robert L Goldenberg; Fabian Esamai; Paul Nyongesa; Silas Ayunga; Edward A Liechty; Ana L Garces; Lester Figueroa; K Michael Hambidge; Nancy F Krebs; Archana Patel; Anjali Bhandarkar; Manjushri Waikar; Patricia L Hibberd; Elwyn Chomba; Waldemar A Carlo; Angel Mwiche; Melody Chiwila; Albert Manasyan; Sayury Pineda; Sreelatha Meleth; Vanessa Thorsten; Kristen Stolka; Dennis D Wallace; Marion Koso-Thomas; Alan H Jobe; Pierre M Buekens Journal: Lancet Date: 2014-10-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Teresa Janevic; Jennifer A Hutcheon; Norm Hess; Laurie Navin; Elizabeth A Howell; Lisa Gittens-Williams Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2018-10
Authors: Ebony B Carter; Alison G Cahill; Margaret A Olsen; George A Macones; Methodius G Tuuli; Molly J Stout Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2019-06-19 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Rupsa C Boelig; Luigi Della Corte; Sherif Ashoush; David McKenna; Gabriele Saccone; Shalini Rajaram; Vincenzo Berghella Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM Date: 2019-03-27
Authors: Brahm Seymour Coler; Oksana Shynlova; Adam Boros-Rausch; Stephen Lye; Stephen McCartney; Kelycia B Leimert; Wendy Xu; Sylvain Chemtob; David Olson; Miranda Li; Emily Huebner; Anna Curtin; Alisa Kachikis; Leah Savitsky; Jonathan W Paul; Roger Smith; Kristina M Adams Waldorf Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: George U Eleje; Ahizechukwu C Eke; Joseph I Ikechebelu; Ifeanyichukwu U Ezebialu; Princeston C Okam; Chito P Ilika Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2020-09-24