Literature DB >> 28222925

Linking national wood consumption with global biodiversity and ecosystem service losses.

Abhishek Chaudhary1, L Roman Carrasco2, Thomas Kastner3.   

Abstract

Identifying the global hotspots of forestry driven species, ecosystem services losses and informing the consuming nations of their environmental footprint domestically and abroad is essential to design demand side interventions and induce sustainable production methods. Here we first use countryside species area relationship model to project species extinctions of four vertebrate taxa (mammals, birds, amphibians and reptiles) due to forest land use in 174 countries. We combine the projected extinctions with a global database on the monetary value of ecosystem services provided by different biomes and with bilateral trade data of wood products to calculate species extinctions and ecosystem services losses inflicted by national wood consumption and international wood trade. Results show that globally a total of 485 species are projected to go extinct due to current forest land use. About 32% of this projected loss can be attributed to land use devoted for export production. However, under the counterfactual scenario with the same consumption levels but no international trade of wood products, an additional 334 species are projected to go extinct. Globally, we find that losses of ecosystem services worth $1.5trillion/year are embodied in the timber trade. Compared to high-income nations, tropical countries such as Philippines, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Gambia and Bolivia presented the highest net ecosystem services losses (>3000US$/ha/year) that could not be compensated through current land rents, indicating underpriced exports. Small tropical countries also gained much lower rents per species extinction suffered. These results can help internalize these costs into the global trade through financial compensation mechanisms such as REDD+ or through price premiums on wood sourced from these countries. Overall the results can provide valuable insights for devising national strategies to meet several of the global Aichi 2020 biodiversity targets and can also be useful for life cycle assessment and product labelling schemes.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biodiversity; Ecosystem; Forestry; Global trade; Land use; Sustainability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28222925     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  2 in total

1.  Towards integrating the ecosystem services cascade framework within the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) cause-effect methodology.

Authors:  Benedetto Rugani; Danielle Maia de Souza; Bo P Weidema; Jane Bare; Bhavik Bakshi; Blane Grann; John M Johnston; Ana Laura Raymundo Pavan; Xinyu Liu; Alexis Laurent; Francesca Verones
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Trends in global dependency on the Indonesian palm oil and resultant environmental impacts.

Authors:  Yosuke Shigetomi; Yuichi Ishimura; Yuki Yamamoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.