Literature DB >> 2822274

Etoposide-induced DNA cleavage in human leukemia cells.

C M Edwards1, B S Glisson, C K King, S Smallwood-Kentro, W E Ross.   

Abstract

The nuclear enzyme, topoisomerase II, is the major site of action for cancer chemotherapy agents such as etoposide, teniposide, and a variety of intercalating agents. These compounds cause the enzyme to cleave DNA, forming a DNA-protein complex that may be a key step leading to cell death. It is apparently unique as a chemotherapy target, since drug potency diminishes with decreasing enzyme activity. It was thus of interest to examine the topoisomerase content and drug-induced DNA cleavage in freshly obtained human leukemia cells and to compare the obtained data with the results of similar studies performed in well-characterized human leukemia cell lines. The human T-lymphoblast line, CCRF-CEM, was more than 100-fold more sensitive to the DNA-cleavage effect of etoposide than the cells of the 13 leukemic patients examined. One of the leukemia lines (HL-60) and a lymphoblastoid line (RPMI-7666) were somewhat less sensitive than cells of the CCRF-CEM cells, but were still 10-fold more sensitive than the patients studied. The relative insensitivity of the freshly obtained cells could not be accounted for by differences with respect to drug uptake but were associated with markedly reduced topoisomerase-II content as assayed by immunoblotting using a mouse polyclonal serum against topoisomerase II. Heterogeneity was observed in the sensitivities of patients' cells with respect to both drug-induced DNA cleavage and enzyme content. The observed differences between cultured cell lines and patients' cells may have been related to their proliferative status. Etoposide potency in normal resting lymphocytes resembles that observed in circulating leukemia cells. However, following mitogenesis with phytohemagglutinin and interleukin-2, proliferating lymphocytes become as sensitive to etoposide as cultured cell lines with regard to DNA cleavage. This effect was accompanied by an increase in topoisomerase-II content. Our data thus support the hypothesis that topoisomerase-II content may be an important determinant of cell sensitivity to certain classes of chemotherapy agents. Efforts to stimulate topoisomerase-II content may improve the therapeutic efficacy of these drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2822274     DOI: 10.1007/BF00253972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  26 in total

1.  Proliferation dependence of topoisomerase II mediated drug action.

Authors:  D M Sullivan; B S Glisson; P K Hodges; S Smallwood-Kentro; W E Ross
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1986-04-22       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  DNA topoisomerase activities in concanavalin A-stimulated lymphocytes.

Authors:  G Taudou; G Mirambeau; C Lavenot; A der Garabedian; J Vermeersch; M Duguet
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1984-10-29       Impact factor: 4.124

3.  Regenerating rat liver topoisomerase II: purification of the enzyme and catenation of DNA rings.

Authors:  G Mirambeau; C Lavenot; M Duguet
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  The production of topoisomerase II-mediated DNA cleavage in human leukemia cells predicts their susceptibility to 4'-(9-acridinylamino)methanesulfon-m-anisidide (m-AMSA).

Authors:  M Bakic; M Beran; B S Andersson; L Silberman; E Estey; L A Zwelling
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1986-01-29       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  Protein kinase C phosphorylates topoisomerase II: topoisomerase activation and its possible role in phorbol ester-induced differentiation of HL-60 cells.

Authors:  N Sahyoun; M Wolf; J Besterman; T Hsieh; M Sander; H LeVine; K J Chang; P Cuatrecasas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Comparison of cytotoxicity and DNA breakage activity of congeners of podophyllotoxin including VP16-213 and VM26: a quantitative structure-activity relationship.

Authors:  B H Long; S T Musial; M G Brattain
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1984-03-13       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Role of topoisomerase II in mediating epipodophyllotoxin-induced DNA cleavage.

Authors:  W Ross; T Rowe; B Glisson; J Yalowich; L Liu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Inhibition of epipodophyllotoxin cytotoxicity by interference with topoisomerase-mediated DNA cleavage.

Authors:  T Rowe; G Kupfer; W Ross
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1985-07-15       Impact factor: 5.858

9.  Loss of viability and induction of DNA damage in human leukemic myeloblasts and lymphocytes by m-AMSA.

Authors:  L W Brox; A Belch; A Ng; E Pollock
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Protein-associated intercalator-induced DNA scission is enhanced by estrogen stimulation in human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  L A Zwelling; D Kerrigan; M E Lippman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  5 in total

1.  Dissociation of cytotoxicity and DNA cleavage activity induced by topoisomerase II-reactive intercalating agents in hamster-human somatic cell hybrids.

Authors:  B S Glisson; A M Killary; P Merta; W E Ross; J Siciliano; M J Siciliano
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 2.  Etoposide. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in combination chemotherapy of cancer.

Authors:  J M Henwood; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of two modalities of etoposide infusion in metastatic non-small-cell lung carcinoma.

Authors:  E Chatelut; C Chevreau; E Blancy; A Lequellec; P Canal; H Roche; G Houin; R Bugat
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 4.  Topoisomerase expression in cancer cell lines and clinical samples.

Authors:  L A Doyle
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Eliminating encephalitogenic T cells without undermining protective immunity.

Authors:  Jonathan P McNally; Eileen E Elfers; Catherine E Terrell; Eli Grunblatt; David A Hildeman; Michael B Jordan; Jonathan D Katz
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 5.422

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.