Moshe Isserles1,2, Zafiris J Daskalakis1,2, Sanjeev Kumar1,2,3, Tarek K Rajji1,2,3, Daniel M Blumberger1,2,3. 1. Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Campbell Family Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 3. Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dementia frequently presents with aggression, agitation, and disorganized behavior for which current treatment is partially effective and is associated with significant adverse effects. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess the clinical effectiveness and tolerability of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in a sample of patients with neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia (NPS) and to explore factors associated with response and with cognitive adverse effects. METHODS: We examined the clinical records of 25 patients with dementia and a pre-existing psychiatric disorder treated with ECT at an academic mental health hospital between April 1, 2010 and January 28, 2016. Twenty-nine acute ECT courses and fifteen maintenance courses were reviewed. We assessed treatment effectiveness and cognitive adverse effects as well as factors associated with response to treatment, including pre-existing psychiatric disorders, concomitant pharmacological treatment and types of dementia. RESULTS: ECT resulted in a clinically meaningful response in 72% of acute treatment courses. Cognitive adverse effects affecting functioning were reported in 7% of the acute treatment courses. Maintenance treatment was effective in sustaining the response in 87% of treatment courses with two reports of significant cognitive adverse effects. One patient fell and experienced a hip fracture a day after treatment. Use of antipsychotic or antidepressant medications, pre-existing psychiatric disorder, or gender were not associated with response. CONCLUSION: This study shows meaningful clinical effectiveness and good tolerability of ECT in patients with severe NPS of dementia. Furthermore, maintenance ECT was effective in sustaining treatment response.
BACKGROUND:Dementia frequently presents with aggression, agitation, and disorganized behavior for which current treatment is partially effective and is associated with significant adverse effects. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess the clinical effectiveness and tolerability of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in a sample of patients with neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia (NPS) and to explore factors associated with response and with cognitive adverse effects. METHODS: We examined the clinical records of 25 patients with dementia and a pre-existing psychiatric disorder treated with ECT at an academic mental health hospital between April 1, 2010 and January 28, 2016. Twenty-nine acute ECT courses and fifteen maintenance courses were reviewed. We assessed treatment effectiveness and cognitive adverse effects as well as factors associated with response to treatment, including pre-existing psychiatric disorders, concomitant pharmacological treatment and types of dementia. RESULTS: ECT resulted in a clinically meaningful response in 72% of acute treatment courses. Cognitive adverse effects affecting functioning were reported in 7% of the acute treatment courses. Maintenance treatment was effective in sustaining the response in 87% of treatment courses with two reports of significant cognitive adverse effects. One patient fell and experienced a hip fracture a day after treatment. Use of antipsychotic or antidepressant medications, pre-existing psychiatric disorder, or gender were not associated with response. CONCLUSION: This study shows meaningful clinical effectiveness and good tolerability of ECT in patients with severe NPS of dementia. Furthermore, maintenance ECT was effective in sustaining treatment response.
Authors: Kaitlin R McManus; Maria I Lapid; Brent P Forester; Martina Mueller; Adriana P Hermida; Louis Nykamp; David G Harper; Stephen J Seiner; Sohag Sanghani; Regan Patrick; Melanie T Gentry; Simon Kung; Janette C Leal; Emily K Johnson; Georgios Petrides Journal: J ECT Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 3.692
Authors: Joanne E Plahouras; Gerasimos Konstantinou; Tyler S Kaster; Daniel Z Buchman; George Foussias; Zafiris J Daskalakis; Daniel M Blumberger Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2021-03-16 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Simon Jc Davies; Amer M Burhan; Donna Kim; Philip Gerretsen; Ariel Graff-Guerrero; Vincent L Woo; Sanjeev Kumar; Sarah Colman; Bruce G Pollock; Benoit H Mulsant; Tarek K Rajji Journal: J Psychopharmacol Date: 2018-01-17 Impact factor: 4.153