Literature DB >> 28221696

Using environmental DNA to assess population-wide spatiotemporal reserve use.

Kathryn Stewart1, Hongjuan Ma1, Jinsong Zheng2, Jianfu Zhao1.   

Abstract

Scientists increasingly rely on protected areas to assist in biodiversity conservation, yet the efficacy of these areas is rarely systematically assessed, often because of underfunding. Still, adaptive management strategies to maximize conservation success often rely on understanding the temporal and spatial dynamism of populations therein. Examination of environmental DNA (eDNA) is a time and cost-effective way to monitor species' distribution, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) provides information on organismal abundance. To date, however, such techniques remain underused for population assessments in protected areas. We determined eDNA concentration of the critically endangered Yangtze finless porpoise (Neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis) to describe its occurrence, range, and use of the Tian e-Zhou National Nature Reserve in Hubei, China, across seasons and hydrological depths. Despite the observation that total eDNA concentrations were highest in surface waters in summer, finless porpoise eDNA concentrations were significantly higher in deeper waters than in surface waters in summer. During the breeding season (spring), eDNA signals were site specific and restricted to the core area of the reserve. However, postbreeding eDNA concentrations were widespread across the reserve, encompassing sites previously thought to be unfrequented by the species. Our results suggest spatiotemporal idiosyncrasies in site, depth, and seasonal use of the reserve and a propensity for postbreeding population dispersal. With eDNA and qPCR we were able to assess an entire population's use of a protected area. Illuminating nuances in habitat use via eDNA could be valuable to set pragmatic conservation goals for this, and other, species.
© 2017 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADNa; conservation planning; dinámicas poblacionales; eDNA; endangered aquatic mammal; mamífero acuático en peligro; planeación de la conservación; population dynamics; protected areas; áreas protegidas

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28221696     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  13 in total

1.  Statistical assessment of DNA extraction methodology for culture-independent analysis of microbial community associated with diverse environmental samples.

Authors:  Rishi Mahajan; Sampan Attri; Kavita Sharma; Niharika Singh; Deepika Sharma; Gunjan Goel
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Environmental DNA from Marine Waters and Substrates: Protocols for Sampling and eDNA Extraction.

Authors:  Dominique A Cowart; Katherine R Murphy; C-H Christina Cheng
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

3.  An optimised eDNA protocol for detecting fish in lentic and lotic freshwaters using a small water volume.

Authors:  Teja Petra Muha; Chloe Victoria Robinson; Carlos Garcia de Leaniz; Sofia Consuegra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Investigating the distribution of the Yangtze finless porpoise in the Yangtze River using environmental DNA.

Authors:  Yongkai Tang; Yunsheng Wu; Kai Liu; Jianlin Li; Hongxia Li; Qin Wang; Juhua Yu; Pao Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Leveraging eDNA to expand the study of hybrid zones.

Authors:  Kathryn A Stewart; Scott A Taylor
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Nuclear eDNA estimates population allele frequencies and abundance in experimental mesocosms and field samples.

Authors:  Kara J Andres; Suresh A Sethi; David M Lodge; Jose Andrés
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Assessing the efficacy of eDNA metabarcoding for measuring microbial biodiversity within forest ecosystems.

Authors:  Zachary S Ladin; Barbra Ferrell; Jacob T Dums; Ryan M Moore; Delphis F Levia; W Gregory Shriver; Vincent D'Amico; Tara L E Trammell; João Carlos Setubal; K Eric Wommack
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Water, water everywhere: environmental DNA can unlock population structure in elusive marine species.

Authors:  Kim M Parsons; Meredith Everett; Marilyn Dahlheim; Linda Park
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  The effects of spatial and temporal replicate sampling on eDNA metabarcoding.

Authors:  Kevin K Beentjes; Arjen G C L Speksnijder; Menno Schilthuizen; Marten Hoogeveen; Berry B van der Hoorn
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Comparing fish prey diversity for a critically endangered aquatic mammal in a reserve and the wild using eDNA metabarcoding.

Authors:  Chanjuan Qu; Kathryn A Stewart; Rute Clemente-Carvalho; Jinsong Zheng; Yuxiang Wang; Cheng Gong; Limin Ma; Jianfu Zhao; Stephen C Lougheed
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.