Literature DB >> 28221157

Minimally invasive PCNL-MIP.

Stefano Paolo Zanetti1, Luca Boeri1, Andrea Gallioli1, Michele Talso1, Emanuele Montanari1.   

Abstract

Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) has increased in popularity in recent years and is now widely used to overcome the therapeutic gap between conventional PCNL and less-invasive procedures such as shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) or flexible ureterorenoscopy (URS) for the treatment of renal stones. However, despite its minimally invasive nature, the superiority in terms of safety, as well as the similar efficacy of mini-PCNL compared to conventional procedures, is still under debate. The aim of this chapter is to present one of the most recent advancements in terms of mini-PCNL: the Karl Storz "minimally invasive PCNL" (MIP). A literature search for original and review articles either published or e-published up to December 2016 was performed using Google and the PubMed database. Keywords included: minimally invasive PCNL; MIP. The retrieved articles were gathered and examined. The complete MIP set is composed of different sized rigid metallic fiber-optic nephroscopes and different sized metallic operating sheaths, according to which the MIP is categorized into extra-small (XS), small (S), medium (M) and large (L). Dilation can be performed either in one-step or with a progressive technique, as needed. The reusable devices of the MIP and vacuum cleaner efect make PCNL with this set a cheap procedure. The possibility to shift from a small to a larger instrument within the same set (Matrioska technique) makes MIP a very versatile technique suitable for the treatment of almost any stone. Studies in the literature have shown that MIP is equally effective, with comparable rates of post-operative complications, as conventional PCNL, independently from stone size. MIP does not represent a new technique, but rather a combination of the last ten years of PCNL improvements in a single system that can transversally cover all available techniques in the panorama of percutaneous stone treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28221157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Esp Urol        ISSN: 0004-0614            Impact factor:   0.436


  9 in total

1.  The comprehensive complication index as a tool for reporting the burden of complications after mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: is it time to leave the Clavien-Dindo classification behind?

Authors:  Luca Boeri; Matteo Turetti; Carlo Silvani; Irene Fulgheri; Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello; Susanna Garbagnati; Matteo Malfatto; Gilda Galbiati; Efrem Pozzi; Stefano Paolo Zanetti; Fabrizio Longo; Elisa De Lorenzis; Giancarlo Albo; Andrea Salonia; Emanuele Montanari
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 3.661

2.  Case report of rescue of a patient with COVID-19 and shock after holmium laser lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jiachun Qu; Kui Xu
Journal:  Int J Urol Nurs       Date:  2022-04-08

Review 3.  Prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy: its advantages and our technique for puncture.

Authors:  Diego M Carrion; José Ramón Cansino; Luis M Quintana; Juan Gómez Rivas; Juan Antonio Mainez Rodriguez; José Ramón Pérez-Carral; Luis Martínez-Piñeiro
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-12

4.  Effectiveness of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Renal Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Chan Hee Kim; Doo Yong Chung; Koon Ho Rha; Joo Yong Lee; Seon Heui Lee
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 2.430

5.  Cost analysis between mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with and without vacuum-assisted access sheath.

Authors:  Elena Lievore; Stefano Paolo Zanetti; Irene Fulgheri; Matteo Turetti; Carlo Silvani; Carolina Bebi; Francesco Ripa; Gianpaolo Lucignani; Edoardo Pozzi; Lorenzo Rocchini; Elisa De Lorenzis; Giancarlo Albo; Fabrizio Longo; Andrea Salonia; Emanuele Montanari; Luca Boeri
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Urologists are optimistic surgeons: prevalence and predictors of discordance between intraoperative stone-free rate and cross-sectional imaging evaluation after vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello; Matteo Turetti; Carlo Silvani; Gilda Galbiati; Susanna Garbagnati; Efrem Pozzi; Matteo Malfatto; Stefano Paolo Zanetti; Fabrizio Longo; Elisa De Lorenzis; Giancarlo Albo; Andrea Salonia; Emanuele Montanari; Luca Boeri
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 7.  Is There Still a Place for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Current Times?

Authors:  Elisa De Lorenzis; Stefano Paolo Zanetti; Luca Boeri; Emanuele Montanari
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 8.  Tips and Tricks to Improve Ergonomics, Efficacy, Versatility, and Overcome Limitations of Micro Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Sarvajit Biligere; Chin-Tiong Heng; Cecilia Cracco; Reshma Mangat; Chloe Shu-Hui Ong; Karthik Thandapani; Takaaki Inoue; Kemal Sarica; Ravindra B Sabnis; Mahesh Desai; Cesare Scoffone; Vineet Gauhar
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-05-19

9.  Feasibility and relevance of urine culture during stone fragmentation in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery: a prospective study.

Authors:  E De Lorenzis; L Boeri; A Gallioli; M Fontana; S P Zanetti; F Longo; R Colombo; M Arghittu; S Piconi; G Albo; A Trinchieri; E Montanari
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.226

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.