Literature DB >> 28220938

Performance of the New BioMonitor 2-AF Insertable Cardiac Monitoring System: Can Better be Worse?

Philipp Lacour1, Phi Long Dang1, Martin Huemer1, Abdul Shokor Parwani1, Philipp Attanasio1, Burkert Pieske1, Leif-Hendrik Boldt1, Wilhelm Haverkamp1, Florian Blaschke1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Implantable loop recorders (ILR) are valuable tools for the investigation of patients with suspected arrhythmias. The BioMonitor 2-AF is a novel insertable ILR with enhanced atrial fibrillation (AF) detection algorithm and remote monitoring capability.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this first-in-human study with the BioMonitor 2-AF was to analyze course of P-wave sensing performance and R-wave amplitude, prevalence of false and correctly sensed and classified episodes, and effectiveness of remote monitoring.
METHODS: All 19 patients who underwent ILR insertion were included in the BIOTRONIK Home Monitoring® system (BIOTRONIK GmbH, Berlin, Germany). Daily changes in P-wave and R-wave sensing were analyzed over 6 weeks. A breathing test (in- and expiration) was performed in two different body positions at baseline and during a 6-week in-house follow-up to investigate alterations of P-wave and R-wave sensing.
RESULTS: R-wave amplitude and the high P-wave visibility (94.4%) remained unchanged during the follow-up period. In most patients both an increase and decrease of R-wave amplitude, and in some cases a complete R-wave vector change (31.6%), was documented during the "breathing test." Change of body position did not alter R-wave sensing amplitude mostly. "Breathing test" and change of body position had no effect on P-wave sensing performance. In 15.8% of the patients, misclassification of episodes as AF or high ventricular rates due to P-wave oversensing occurred. No ILR-related complication occurred. Automatic transmission via BIOTRONIK Home Monitoring® was successful 100% of the time.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the BioMonitor 2-AF is a safe and effective tool for continuous cardiac monitoring.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  P-wave sensing; R-wave sensing; artifact sensing; implantable loop recorder

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28220938     DOI: 10.1111/pace.13059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  7 in total

1.  Programming Optimization in Implantable Cardiac Monitors to Reduce False-Positive Arrhythmia Alerts: A Call for Research.

Authors:  Fabrizio Guarracini; Martina Testolina; Daniele Giacopelli; Marta Martin; Francesco Triglione; Alessio Coser; Silvia Quintarelli; Roberto Bonmassari; Massimiliano Marini
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-15

Review 2.  [Indications for loop recorder implantation for syncope].

Authors:  Andreas Schuchert
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2018-05-02

3.  Factors affecting signal quality in implantable cardiac monitors with long sensing vector.

Authors:  Giovanni B Forleo; Claudia Amellone; Riccardo Sacchi; Leonida Lombardi; Maria Teresa Lucciola; Valentina Scotti; Maurizio Viecca; Marco Schiavone; Daniele Giacopelli; Massimo Giammaria
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2021-06-21

4.  The Potential and Limitations of Mobile Health and Insertable Cardiac Monitors in the Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in Cryptogenic Stroke Patients: Preliminary Results From the REMOTE Trial.

Authors:  Femke Wouters; Henri Gruwez; Julie Vranken; Dimitri Vanhaen; Bo Daelman; Ludovic Ernon; Dieter Mesotten; Pieter Vandervoort; David Verhaert
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-13

5.  R-wave amplitude changes with posture and physical activity over time in an insertable cardiac monitor.

Authors:  Matthew Swale; Sinny Delacroix; Glenn Young; Vincent Paul; Luke McSpadden; Kyungmoo Ryu; David Di Fiore; Maria Santos; Isabel Tan; Andre Conradie; MyNgan Duong; Nisha Schwarz; Stephen Worthley; Stephen Pavia
Journal:  Cardiovasc Digit Health J       Date:  2021-12-30

6.  New-generation miniaturized insertable cardiac monitor with a long sensing vector: Insertion procedure, sensing performance, and home monitoring transmission success in a real-world population.

Authors:  Thomas Deneke; Pilar Cabanas; Daniel Hofer; Thomas Gaspar; Bertrand Pierre; Giovanni Bisignani; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Victor Manuel Sanfins; Eimo Martens; Jacques Mansourati; Antonio Berruezo-Sanchez; Marcus Wiemer; Andreas Hain; Thomas Pezawas; Beate Wenzel; Dennis Lau
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2022-01-30

7.  The BIOMONITOR III Injectable Cardiac Monitor: Clinical Experience with a Novel Injectable Cardiac Monitor.

Authors:  Nico Reinsch; Anna Füting; Dennis Höwel; Kars Neven
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.