Literature DB >> 28220497

Round window stimulation with the Vibrant Soundbridge: Comparison of direct and indirect coupling.

Lukasz Olszewski1,2, W Wiktor Jedrzejczak1,2, Anna Piotrowska1,2, Henryk Skarzynski1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to measure the degree of coupling between the floating mass transducer (FMT) and the round window membrane (RWM) in patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss implanted with the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) device. The efficiency of direct and indirect coupling of the FMT to the RWM was compared by measuring differences between the initial prescription targets and the final settings of the VSB audio processor after fine-tuning. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
METHODS: Investigation of a group of subjects with either conductive or mixed hearing loss implanted with the VSB, a device that uses a FMT coupled to the RWM. There were two subgroups: subjects in which coupling was direct (no interposed material) or indirect (interposed material). The functional gain, insertion gain, and compression characteristics of the device were measured to assess the efficiency of coupling and to investigate the proximity of the fitting to prescriptive targets.
RESULTS: Coupling for the subgroup with indirect coupling of the RWM was higher (better) than for the subgroup with direct coupling. The gain deviation from prescriptive targets was smaller for the subgroup with indirect coupling.
CONCLUSIONS: The coupling method can have an effect on the coupling efficiency and the final electroacoustic settings of the device. The prescription targets were not accurate for the majority of subjects from either subgroup. Indirect coupling appears to provide more effective stimulation of the cochlea. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 127:2843-2849, 2017.
© 2017 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conductive hearing loss; Vibrant Soundbridge; desired sensation level; hearing aid fitting; middle ear implant; mixed hearing loss; round window

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28220497     DOI: 10.1002/lary.26536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  4 in total

1.  The Hannover Coupler V2: Audiological outcomes of a round window coupler for the Vibrant Soundbridge.

Authors:  Nicole Knölke; Dawid Murawski; Nina Wardenga; Susan Busch; Hannes Maier; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-05-28

2.  Implantation of the Vibrant Soundbridge in a Case of Bilateral Malformation of the Middle and External Ear.

Authors:  Henryk Skarżyński; Łukasz Plichta; Bartłomiej Król; Katarzyna Beata Cywka; Piotr Henryk Skarżyński
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2021-05-12

3.  Three-year audiological outcomes of the latest generation middle ear transducer (MET) implant.

Authors:  Henryk Skarżyński; Beata Dziendziel; Elżbieta Włodarczyk; Piotr H Skarżyński
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Round Window Stimulation of the Cochlea.

Authors:  Herman A Jenkins; Nathaniel Greene; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.003

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.