Literature DB >> 28220241

[ICD in elderly patients].

Carsten W Israel1.   

Abstract

Treatment with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) represents a prognostic but not symptomatic therapy. It should therefore be restricted to patients where an improvement of prognosis is possible and reasonable. ICD implantation should only be performed in patients with a life expectancy of at least 1 year at reasonable quality of life. The decision in which patient improvement of prognosis is no longer a desirable target is problematic, both medically and ethically. It is not entirely clear in which elderly patient an ICD therapy can convey prognostic benefit despite comorbidity and competitive life-threatening diseases, as it is unclear how old age should be defined. In primary prophylaxis of sudden cardiac death, data on a prognostic benefit of the ICD in elderly patients are less clear than in secondary prophylaxis since short-term mortality due to other causes is higher in the elderly. However, elderly ICD patients have a similar rate of appropriate ICD therapy as younger patients. Complications at ICD implantation or long-term lead failure do not occur more frequently in elderly patients and therefore do not represent a reason to withhold ICD implantation in elderly patients or to set an age limit above which ICD implantation should no longer be performed. The ICD indication in elderly patients should be individualized depending on remaining life expectancy, comorbidity, "biological age" and patient preferences which play a particularly important role in elderly patients. Aspects of a potential improvement in quality of life by the ICD which may also serve as a system for antibradycardiac or resynchronization treatment should be included into considerations. Deactivation of at least shock therapy should be discussed in elderly patients fitted with an ICD if the subject is brought up by the patient or if clinical deterioration suggests the need to talk about a "do not resuscitate" order. This talk should be performed before death is imminent and before an electrical storm in terminal illness leads to multiple shocks by the active device.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comorbidity; Elderly patients; End of life; Implantable cardioverter defibrillator; Prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28220241     DOI: 10.1007/s00399-017-0495-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol        ISSN: 0938-7412


  51 in total

1.  Randomized comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest : the Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg (CASH).

Authors:  K H Kuck; R Cappato; J Siebels; R Rüppel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Mortality-related factors and 1-year survival in nursing home residents.

Authors:  Jonathan M Flacker; Dan K Kiely
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction.

Authors:  Arthur J Moss; Wojciech Zareba; W Jackson Hall; Helmut Klein; David J Wilber; David S Cannom; James P Daubert; Steven L Higgins; Mary W Brown; Mark L Andrews
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Prophylactic use of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Stefan H Hohnloser; Karl Heinz Kuck; Paul Dorian; Robin S Roberts; John R Hampton; Robert Hatala; Eric Fain; Michael Gent; Stuart J Connolly
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Development and validation of a prognostic index for 1-year mortality in older adults after hospitalization.

Authors:  L C Walter; R J Brand; S R Counsell; R M Palmer; C S Landefeld; R H Fortinsky; K E Covinsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-06-20       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Canadian implantable defibrillator study (CIDS) : a randomized trial of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator against amiodarone.

Authors:  S J Connolly; M Gent; R S Roberts; P Dorian; D Roy; R S Sheldon; L B Mitchell; M S Green; G J Klein; B O'Brien
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-03-21       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Perspectives on care at the close of life. Initiating end-of-life discussions with seriously ill patients: addressing the "elephant in the room".

Authors:  T E Quill
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  A randomized study of the prevention of sudden death in patients with coronary artery disease. Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial Investigators.

Authors:  A E Buxton; K L Lee; J D Fisher; M E Josephson; E N Prystowsky; G Hafley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-12-16       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Feasibility of implantable cardioverter defibrillator use in elderly patients: a case series of octogenarians.

Authors:  Peter A Noseworthy; Ilan Lashevsky; Paul Dorian; Mary Greene; Suzan Cvitkovic; David Newman
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.976

10.  Prophylactic defibrillator implantation in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Alan Kadish; Alan Dyer; James P Daubert; Rebecca Quigg; N A Mark Estes; Kelley P Anderson; Hugh Calkins; David Hoch; Jeffrey Goldberger; Alaa Shalaby; William E Sanders; Andi Schaechter; Joseph H Levine
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.