| Literature DB >> 28220109 |
Jakub Kreisinger1, Lucie Kropáčková1, Adéla Petrželková2, Marie Adámková3, Oldřich Tomášek4, Jean-François Martin5, Romana Michálková1, Tomáš Albrecht4.
Abstract
Animal bodies are inhabited by a taxonomically and functionally diverse community of symbiotic and commensal microorganisms. From an ecological and evolutionary perspective, inter-individual variation in host-associated microbiota contributes to physiological and immune system variation. As such, host-associated microbiota may be considered an integral part of the host's phenotype, serving as a substrate for natural selection. This assumes that host-associated microbiota exhibits high temporal stability, however, and that its composition is shaped by trans-generational transfer or heritable host-associated microbiota modulators encoded by the host genome. Although this concept is widely accepted, its crucial assumptions have rarely been tested in wild vertebrate populations. We performed 16S rRNA metabarcoding on an extensive set of fecal microbiota (FM) samples from an insectivorous, long-distance migratory bird, the barn swallow (Hirundo rustica). Our data revealed clear differences in FM among juveniles and adults as regards taxonomic and functional composition, diversity and co-occurrence network complexity. Multiple FM samples from the same juvenile or adult collected within single breeding seasons exhibited higher similarity than expected by chance, as did adult FM samples over two consecutive years. Despite low effect sizes for FM stability over time at the community level, we identified an adult FM subset with relative abundances exhibiting significant temporal consistency, possibly inducing long-term effects on the host phenotype. Our data also indicate a slight maternal (but not paternal) effect on FM composition in social offspring, though this is unlikely to persist into adulthood. We discuss our findings in the context of both evolution and ecology of microbiota vs. host interactions and barn swallow biology.Entities:
Keywords: barn swallow; fecal microbiota; gastrointestinal tract; metagenome; microbiome; symbiosis
Year: 2017 PMID: 28220109 PMCID: PMC5292904 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Divergence between adult vs. juvenile barn swallow fecal microbiota (FM).
| Adonis | Betadisper | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input data | Effect | Df | SS | MSS | SS | MSS | |||||
| OTUs: weighted UniFrac | Adults vs. young | 1 | 0.331 | 0.331 | 11.603 | 0.067 | 0.001 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 5.204 | 0.024 |
| Residuals | 161 | 4.596 | 0.029 | 0.933 | 0.359 | 0.002 | |||||
| OTUs: unweighted UniFrac | Adults vs. young | 1 | 2.575 | 2.575 | 11.253 | 0.065 | 0.001 | 0.147 | 0.147 | 29.346 | <0.001 |
| Residuals | 161 | 36.835 | 0.229 | 0.935 | 0.804 | 0.005 | |||||
| OTUs: Bray–Curtis | Adults vs. young | 1 | 4.015 | 4.015 | 10.250 | 0.060 | 0.001 | 0.030 | 0.030 | 7.346 | 0.007 |
| Residuals | 161 | 63.065 | 0.392 | 0.940 | 0.654 | 0.004 | |||||
| OTUs: Jaccard | Adults vs. young | 1 | 3.142 | 3.142 | 8.527 | 0.050 | 0.001 | 0.058 | 0.058 | 33.110 | <0.001 |
| Residuals | 161 | 59.331 | 0.369 | 0.950 | 0.282 | 0.002 | |||||
| KEGGs: Bray–Curtis | Adults vs. young | 1 | 0.070 | 0.070 | 5.949 | 0.036 | 0.003 | 0.015 | 0.015 | 6.166 | 0.014 |
| Residuals | 161 | 1.902 | 0.012 | 0.964 | 0.401 | 0.002 | |||||
Effect of individual identity, breeding colony, and year on the divergence of adult barn swallow FM.
| Within vs. among individuals (within years) | Within vs. among individuals (among years) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observed diff. | 95% CI range | Cliff’s | Observed diff. | 95% CI range | Cliff’s | |||
| OTUs: weighted UniFrac | - | 0.011 | -0.016~0.016 | 0.118 | 0.046 | |||
| OTUs: unweighted UniFrac | -0.004 | -0.015~0.011 | 0.591 | -0.018 | 0.003 | -0.014~0.015 | 0.42 | -0.001 |
| OTUs: Bray–Curtis | - | - | ||||||
| OTUs: Jaccard | -0.002 | -0.007~0.008 | 0.692 | -0.011 | 0.007 | -0.009~0.009 | 0.077 | 0.061 |
| KEGGs: Bray–Curtis | - | - | ||||||
| OTUs: weighted UniFrac | - | - | ||||||
| OTUs: unweighted UniFrac | - | - | ||||||
| OTUs: Bray–Curtis | - | - | ||||||
| OTUs: Jaccard | - | - | ||||||
| KEGGs: Bray–Curtis | - | - | ||||||
Effect of individual identity, clutch identity, and breeding colony on FM divergence in juvenile barn swallows.
| Within vs. among individuals | Within vs. among nests | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observed diff. | 95% CI range | Cliff’s | Observed diff. | 95% CI range | Cliff’s | |||
| OTUs: weighted UniFrac | 0.027 | -0.002~0.025 | 0.023 | 0.159 | - | |||
| OTUs: unweighted UniFrac | - | - | ||||||
| OTUs: Bray–Curtis | 0.07 | 0.004~0.057 | 0.006 | 0.236 | - | |||
| OTUs: Jaccard | - | - | ||||||
| KEGGs: Bray–Curtis | 0.004 | -0.002~0.014 | 0.684 | 0.042 | - | |||
| OTUs: weighted UniFrac | 0.002 | -0.004~0.003 | 0.101 | 0.017 | ||||
| OTUs: unweighted UniFrac | - | |||||||
| OTUs: Bray–Curtis | - | |||||||
| OTUs: Jaccard | - | |||||||
| KEGGs: Bray–Curtis | -0.003 | -0.002~0.002 | 0.977 | -0.028 | ||||
Barn swallow parent vs. offspring similarity.
| Father vs. offspring similarity | Mother vs. offspring similarity | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observed diff. | 95% CI range | Cliff’s | Observed diff. | 95% CI range | Cliff’s | |||
| OTUs: weighted UniFrac | -0.004 | -0.017~0.017 | 0.631 | -0.016 | - | |||
| OTUs: unweighted UniFrac | 0.01 | -0.016~0.016 | 0.188 | 0.074 | -0.005 | -0.024~0.024 | 0.616 | -0.038 |
| OTUs: Bray–Curtis | -0.005 | -0.016~0.018 | 0.639 | -0.022 | - | |||
| OTUs: Jaccard | 0.006 | -0.01~0.01 | 0.194 | 0.079 | 0.002 | -0.013~0.013 | 0.4 | 0.035 |
| KEGGs: Bray–Curtis | 0.005 | -0.019~0.018 | 0.328 | 0.003 | -0.007 | -0.017~0.017 | 0.724 | -0.104 |