Literature DB >> 28219262

Individual Differences in the Flexibility of Peripersonal Space.

Samuel B Hunley1, Arwen M Marker2, Stella F Lourenco1.   

Abstract

The current study investigated individual differences in the flexibility of peripersonal space (i.e., representational space near the body), specifically in relation to trait claustrophobic fear (i.e., fear of suffocating or being physically restricted). Participants completed a line bisection task with either a laser pointer (Laser condition), allowing for a baseline measure of the size of one's peripersonal space, or a stick (Stick condition), which produces expansion of one's peripersonal space. Our results revealed that individuals high in claustrophobic fear had larger peripersonal spaces than those lower in claustrophobic fear, replicating previous research. We also found that, whereas individuals low in claustrophobic fear demonstrated the expected expansion of peripersonal space in the Stick condition, individuals high in claustrophobic fear showed less expansion, suggesting decreased flexibility. We discuss these findings in relation to the defensive function of peripersonal space and reduced attentional flexibility associated with trait anxieties.

Entities:  

Keywords:  claustrophobic fear; line bisection; perception; peripersonal space; spatial attention

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28219262     DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1618-3169


  10 in total

1.  Peripersonal space boundaries around the lower limbs.

Authors:  K D Stone; M Kandula; A Keizer; H C Dijkerman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Experts in action: why we need an embodied social brain hypothesis.

Authors:  Louise Barrett; S Peter Henzi; Robert A Barton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Action ability modulates time-to-collision judgments.

Authors:  Eleonora Vagnoni; Vasiliki Andreanidou; Stella F Lourenco; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Listening to a conversation with aggressive content expands the interpersonal space.

Authors:  Eleonora Vagnoni; Jessica Lewis; Ana Tajadura-Jiménez; Flavia Cardini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Peripersonal Space and Bodily Self-Consciousness: Implications for Psychological Trauma-Related Disorders.

Authors:  Daniela Rabellino; Paul A Frewen; Margaret C McKinnon; Ruth A Lanius
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Idiosyncratic representation of peripersonal space depends on the success of one's own motor actions, but also the successful actions of others!

Authors:  Yann Coello; François Quesque; Maria-Francesca Gigliotti; Laurent Ott; Jean-Luc Bruyelle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Frontier of Self and Impact Prediction.

Authors:  Justine Cléry; Suliann Ben Hamed
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-06-27

8.  Visuo-motor and interoceptive influences on peripersonal space representation following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Michele Scandola; Salvatore Maria Aglioti; Giovanna Lazzeri; Renato Avesani; Silvio Ionta; Valentina Moro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Lower limb peripersonal space and the desire to amputate a leg.

Authors:  Kayla D Stone; Clara A E Kornblad; Manja M Engel; H Chris Dijkerman; Rianne M Blom; Anouk Keizer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-03-20

10.  Time Interaction With Two Spatial Dimensions: From Left/Right to Near/Far.

Authors:  Michela Candini; Mariano D'Angelo; Francesca Frassinetti
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.