Literature DB >> 28219110

Estimating inverse probability weights using super learner when weight-model specification is unknown in a marginal structural Cox model context.

Mohammad Ehsanul Karim1, Robert W Platt2,3,4,5.   

Abstract

Correct specification of the inverse probability weighting (IPW) model is necessary for consistent inference from a marginal structural Cox model (MSCM). In practical applications, researchers are typically unaware of the true specification of the weight model. Nonetheless, IPWs are commonly estimated using parametric models, such as the main-effects logistic regression model. In practice, assumptions underlying such models may not hold and data-adaptive statistical learning methods may provide an alternative. Many candidate statistical learning approaches are available in the literature. However, the optimal approach for a given dataset is impossible to predict. Super learner (SL) has been proposed as a tool for selecting an optimal learner from a set of candidates using cross-validation. In this study, we evaluate the usefulness of a SL in estimating IPW in four different MSCM simulation scenarios, in which we varied the specification of the true weight model specification (linear and/or additive). Our simulations show that, in the presence of weight model misspecification, with a rich and diverse set of candidate algorithms, SL can generally offer a better alternative to the commonly used statistical learning approaches in terms of MSE as well as the coverage probabilities of the estimated effect in an MSCM. The findings from the simulation studies guided the application of the MSCM in a multiple sclerosis cohort from British Columbia, Canada (1995-2008), to estimate the impact of beta-interferon treatment in delaying disability progression.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  inverse-probability weighting; marginal structural models; multiple sclerosis; super learner; time-dependent confounding

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28219110     DOI: 10.1002/sim.7266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  6 in total

1.  Addressing Measurement Error in Random Forests Using Quantitative Bias Analysis.

Authors:  Tammy Jiang; Jaimie L Gradus; Timothy L Lash; Matthew P Fox
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 5.363

2.  Performance of the marginal structural cox model for estimating individual and joined effects of treatments given in combination.

Authors:  Clovis Lusivika-Nzinga; Hana Selinger-Leneman; Sophie Grabar; Dominique Costagliola; Fabrice Carrat
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  Can Hyperparameter Tuning Improve the Performance of a Super Learner?: A Case Study.

Authors:  Jenna Wong; Travis Manderson; Michal Abrahamowicz; David L Buckeridge; Robyn Tamblyn
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Estimating the causal effects of multiple intermittent treatments with application to COVID-19.

Authors:  Liangyuan Hu; Fan Li; Jiayi Ji; Himanshu Joshi; Erick Scott
Journal:  ArXiv       Date:  2021-09-27

5.  Separating Algorithms From Questions and Causal Inference With Unmeasured Exposures: An Application to Birth Cohort Studies of Early Body Mass Index Rebound.

Authors:  Izzuddin M Aris; Aaron L Sarvet; Mats J Stensrud; Romain Neugebauer; Ling-Jun Li; Marie-France Hivert; Emily Oken; Jessica G Young
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  The causal effect and impact of reproductive factors on breast cancer using super learner and targeted maximum likelihood estimation: a case-control study in Fars Province, Iran.

Authors:  Amir Almasi-Hashiani; Saharnaz Nedjat; Reza Ghiasvand; Saeid Safiri; Maryam Nazemipour; Nasrin Mansournia; Mohammad Ali Mansournia
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.