| Literature DB >> 28218249 |
Gaetano Valenza1,2, Luca Citi3, Ronald G Garcia4, Jessica Noggle Taylor5, Nicola Toschi1,6, Riccardo Barbieri1,7.
Abstract
The application of complex systems theory to physiology and medicine has provided meaningful information about the nonlinear aspects underlying the dynamics of a wide range of biological processes and their disease-related aberrations. However, no studies have investigated whether meaningful information can be extracted by quantifying second-order moments of time-varying cardiovascular complexity. To this extent, we introduce a novel mathematical framework termed complexity variability, in which the variance of instantaneous Lyapunov spectra estimated over time serves as a reference quantifier. We apply the proposed methodology to four exemplary studies involving disorders which stem from cardiology, neurology and psychiatry: Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), Major Depression Disorder (MDD), Parkinson's Disease (PD), and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) patients with insomnia under a yoga training regime. We show that complexity assessments derived from simple time-averaging are not able to discern pathology-related changes in autonomic control, and we demonstrate that between-group differences in measures of complexity variability are consistent across pathologies. Pathological states such as CHF, MDD, and PD are associated with an increased complexity variability when compared to healthy controls, whereas wellbeing derived from yoga in PTSD is associated with lower time-variance of complexity.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28218249 PMCID: PMC5316947 DOI: 10.1038/srep42779
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Instantaneous heartbeat statistics computed using a NARL model from a representative CHF patient (top panels) and healthy subject (bottom panels).
Estimated μ(t) and IDLE series are reported.
Group Statistics of Features from healthy and CHF subjects.
| CHF | Healthy | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 654.77 ± 61.8 | 863.8 ± 53.7 | <4 | |
| 8.12 ± 2.0 | 23.7 ± 7.2 | <7 | |
| 28.78 ± 19.1 | 507.3 ± 204.7 | <3 | |
| 40.29 ± 31.6 | 627.0 ± 408.2 | <1 | |
| 0.72 ± 0.4 | 1.12 ± 0.7 | >0.05 | |
| 0.0014 ± 0.0649 | 0.0135 ± 0.0368 | >0.05 | |
| 0.0595 ± 0.0120 | 0.0476 ± 0.0066 | <0.05 |
p-values are obtained from the Mann-Whitney test between the CHF and healthy subject groups.
Figure 2Instantaneous heartbeat statistics computed from a representative MDD patient (top panels) and healthy subject (bottom panels) using a NARL model.
Estimated μ(t) and IDLE series are shown along a 10 minutes of resting state.
Group Statistics of Features from the MDD dataset.
| MDD | Healthy | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| μRR(ms) | 932.96 ± 53.96 | 921.90 ± 72.57 | >0.05 |
| 1310.70 ± 756.63 | 958.06 ± 547.60 | >0.05 | |
| LF(ms2) | 854.35 ± 672.67 | 742.52 ± 406.91 | >0.05 |
| HF(ms2) | 1120.38 ± 645.29 | 906.98 ± 605.64 | >0.05 |
| Balance | 0.76 ± 0.35 | 0.78 ± 0.49 | >0.05 |
| IDLE | 0.035735 ± 0.0405 | 0.0247 ± 0.0418 | >0.05 |
| CVIDLE | 0.080021 ± 0.0164 | 0.0694 ± 0.0149 | <0.03 |
p-value are from the Mann-Whitney non-parametric test with null hypothesis of equal medians. No significant difference was found in any feature except in our novel heartbeat complexity variability index CV.
Figure 3Instantaneous heartbeat statistics computed using a NARL model from a representative PTSD patient before (top panels) and after (bottom panels) performing a yoga training.
Estimated μ(t) and IDLE series are reported.
Group Statistics of Features from PTSD before and after Yoga training.
| Before Yoga | After Yoga | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 807.27 ± 38.37 | 789.14 ± 76.85 | >0.05 | |
| 207.52 ± 152.96 | 679.96 ± 601.31 | >0.05 | |
| 573.87 ± 325.02 | 496.80 ± 274.64 | >0.05 | |
| 213.79 ± 188.52 | 484.13 ± 459.82 | >0.05 | |
| 2.52 ± 1.82 | 3.14 ± 2.47 | >0.05 | |
| −0.0369 ± 0.0441 | 0.0036 ± 0.0486 | >0.05 | |
| 0.0602 ± 0.0139 | 0.0358 ± 0.0107 | <0.02 |
p-values are from the Wilcoxon non-parametric test for paired data with null hypothesis of equal medians. No significant difference was found in any feature except in our novel heartbeat complexity variability index CV.
Figure 4Instantaneous heartbeat statistics computed using a NARL model from a representative PD patient (top panels) and healthy subject (bottom panels) during 10 minutes of resting state.
Estimated μ(t) and IDLE series are reported.
Statistical analysis between PD and healthy groups.
| PD | Healthy | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 915.5 ± 71.9 | 918.3 ± 101.2 | >0.05 | |
| 203.64 ± 104.84 | 272.46 ± 117.84 | >0.05 | |
| 184.20 ± 119.13 | 176.27 ± 108.93 | >0.05 | |
| 121.64 ± 50.50 | 141.44 ± 78.20 | >0.05 | |
| 1.27 ± 0.80 | 1.26 ± 0.61 | >0.05 | |
| −0.004 ± 0.027 | −0.034 ± 0.035 | >0.05 | |
| 0.0796 ± 0.0140 | 0.0596 ± 0.0136 | <0.05 |
p-value are from the Mann-Whitney non-parametric test with null hypothesis of equal medians. No significant difference was found in any feature except in our novel heartbeat complexity variability index CV.
A summary of all features used in this study.
| Feature Symbol | Description | Meaning | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean of the Inverse-Gaussian | Instantaneous Mean of the RR Interval Series | ||
| Variance of the Inverse-Gaussian | Instantaneous Standard Deviation of the RR Interval Series | ||
| Low-Frequency Power of the RR interval series spectrum | Instantaneous Sympathetic and Parasympathetic Activity | ||
| High-Frequency Power of the RR interval series spectrum | Instantaneous Parasympathetic Activity | ||
| Ratio between Low- and High-Frequency Power of the RR interval series spectrum | Instantaneous Sympatho-Vagal Balance | ||
| Dominant (First) Lyapunov Exponent of the RR interval series | Measure of Instantaneous Complexity | ||
| Variance of the | Measure of |