Literature DB >> 28217865

Caching reduces kleptoparasitism in a solitary, large felid.

Guy A Balme1,2, Jennifer R B Miller1,2,3, Ross T Pitman1, Luke T B Hunter1,4.   

Abstract

Food caching is a common strategy used by a diversity of animals, including carnivores, to store and/or secure food. Despite its prevalence, the drivers of caching behaviour, and its impacts on individuals, remain poorly understood, particularly for short-term food cachers. Leopards Panthera pardus exhibit a unique form of short-term food caching, regularly hoisting, storing and consuming prey in trees. We explored the factors motivating such behaviour among leopards in the Sabi Sand Game Reserve, South Africa, associated with four not mutually exclusive hypotheses: food-perishability, consumption-time, resource-pulse and kleptoparasitism-avoidance. Using data from 2032 prey items killed by 104 leopards from 2013 to 2015, we built generalized linear mixed models to examine how hoisting behaviour, feeding time and the likelihood of a kill being kleptoparasitized varied with leopard sex and age, prey size and vulnerability, vegetation, elevation, climate, and the immediate and long-term risk posed by dominant competitors. Leopards hoisted 51% of kills. They were more likely to hoist kills of an intermediate size, outside of a resource pulse and in response to the presence of some competitors. Hoisted kills were also fed on for longer than non-hoisted kills. At least 21% of kills were kleptoparasitized, mainly by spotted hyaenas Crocuta crocuta. Kills were more likely to be kleptoparasitized at lower temperatures and if prey were larger, not hoisted, and in areas where the risk of encountering hyaenas was greatest. Female leopards that suffered higher rates of kleptoparasitism exhibited lower annual reproductive success than females that lost fewer kills. Our results strongly support the kleptoparasitism-avoidance hypothesis and suggest hoisting is a key adaptation that enables leopards to coexist sympatrically with high densities of competitors. We further argue that leopards may select smaller-sized prey than predicted by optimal foraging theory, to balance trade-offs between kleptoparasitic losses and the energetic gains derived from killing larger prey. Although caching may provide the added benefits of delaying food perishability and enabling consumption over an extended period, the behaviour primarily appears to be a strategy for leopards, and possibly other short-term cachers, to reduce the risks of kleptoparasitism.
© 2017 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2017 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Panthera pardus; competition; consumption time; food perishability; kleptoparasitism avoidance; optimal foraging; resource pulse; short-term caching; spotted hyaena

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28217865     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  8 in total

1.  Understanding decision making in a food-caching predator using hidden Markov models.

Authors:  Mohammad S Farhadinia; Théo Michelot; Paul J Johnson; Luke T B Hunter; David W Macdonald
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 3.600

2.  Energetics and evasion dynamics of large predators and prey: pumas vs. hounds.

Authors:  Caleb M Bryce; Christopher C Wilmers; Terrie M Williams
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  An adaptable but threatened big cat: density, diet and prey selection of the Indochinese leopard (Panthera pardus delacouri) in eastern Cambodia.

Authors:  Susana Rostro-García; Jan F Kamler; Rachel Crouthers; Keo Sopheak; Sovanna Prum; Visattha In; Chanratana Pin; Anthony Caragiulo; David W Macdonald
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Leopard and spotted hyena densities in the Lake Mburo National Park, southwestern Uganda.

Authors:  Aleksander Braczkowski; Ralph Schenk; Dinal Samarasinghe; Duan Biggs; Allie Richardson; Nicholas Swanson; Merlin Swanson; Arjun Dheer; Julien Fattebert
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  The effect of competing carnivores on the feeding behaviour of leopards (Panthera pardus) in an African savanna.

Authors:  Allan Tarugara; Bruce W Clegg; Edson Gandiwa; Victor K Muposhi
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Are pumas subordinate carnivores, and does it matter?

Authors:  L Mark Elbroch; Anna Kusler
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Natural and anthropogenic drivers of cub recruitment in a large carnivore.

Authors:  Femke Broekhuis
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-06-17       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Prey availability and intraguild competition regulate the spatiotemporal dynamics of a modified large carnivore guild.

Authors:  Robert S Davis; Richard W Yarnell; Louise K Gentle; Antonio Uzal; William O Mgoola; Emma L Stone
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.