Literature DB >> 28217605

A rare cause of misdiagnosis in chest X-ray.

Carlos Manuel Ortiz-Mendoza1.   

Abstract

Chest X-ray is a usual tool for family physicians; however, unexpected findings in chest X-ray are a frequent challenge. We present a rare case of pulmonary hilar nodule misdiagnosis in a chest X-ray. An 84-year-old woman was sent with a diagnosis of a right pulmonary hilum nodule. She had a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; so in a chest X-ray, her family physician discovered a "nodule" in her right lung hilum. Her physical exam was not relevant. In our hospital, a thoracic computed tomography (CT) scan verified the mass in the right pulmonary hilum; nevertheless, in a coronal CT scan, the "hilum lump" was the tortuous descending aorta that created an angle. This case illustrates how anatomical changes associated with vascular aging may cause this exceptional pitfall in chest X-ray.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; aorta; chest X-ray; computed tomography scan; female; hilum; imaging; lung; woman

Year:  2016        PMID: 28217605      PMCID: PMC5290782          DOI: 10.4103/2249-4863.197307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care        ISSN: 2249-4863


Introduction

In family medicine, the chest X-ray is a common tool in several diseases,[1234] and unexpected findings discovered in this modality are a frequent challenge.[2] The unexpected findings in a chest X-ray need more complex methods of evaluation and reference to other medical specialties.[2] In pulmonology and thoracic surgery, the pulmonary solitary nodule and hilum nodules are a frequent entity to evaluate.[5] Nevertheless, a pulmonary hilum nodule may be a granuloma, primary malignant lymph node neoplasms, bronchus tumors, or metastatic tumors to lymph nodes.[56] However, to our best knowledge, there are not previous pictorial essays regarding anatomical changes of descending aorta associated with aging that caused misdiagnosis of pulmonary hilum nodules in chest X-ray.

Case Report

An 84-year-old woman came with the diagnosis of a right pulmonary hilum nodule. She had a long-lasting history of obesity (body mass index of 30.3 kg/m2) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treated with oxygen, bronchodilators, and a beta agonist. During an evaluation, in a chest X-ray, her family physician discovered a “nodule” in her right pulmonary hilum [Figure 1, Panel “A”]. Her physical exam was not relevant for signs of malignancy, and the chest X-ray was not conclusive. She was sent to our hospital, where a noncontrast thoracic computed tomography (CT) scan documented the right pulmonary hilar mass [Figure 1, topogram, Panel “B”]; however, in a coronal scan, the “nodule” was the tortuous descending aorta that made an angle [Figure 1, Panel “C”]. With this finding, the patient was returned to her family physician.
Figure 1

Panel “A,” chest radiograph, showing a right hilum nodule. Panel “B,” computed tomography scan topogram, corroborating the hilum nodule. Panel “C,” coronal reconstruction of computed tomography scan, showing an edge formed by descending thoracic aorta that created the false impression of a hilar lump

Panel “A,” chest radiograph, showing a right hilum nodule. Panel “B,” computed tomography scan topogram, corroborating the hilum nodule. Panel “C,” coronal reconstruction of computed tomography scan, showing an edge formed by descending thoracic aorta that created the false impression of a hilar lump

Discussion

This case illustrates how aortic changes associated with vascular aging may cause this exceptional misdiagnosis in chest X-ray. It is important to remember, that even with modern technological devices diagnostic pitfalls may occur; for instance, with transesophageal echocardiography or positron emission tomography.[57] It is well -known; the descending thoracic aorta could suffer an expanding and unfolding process with aging.[89] In addition, aortic tortuosity may occur with obesity, atherosclerotic disease, and hypertension.[10] In our case, at least two of these well-recognized entities occurred. A careful history and a diligent physical examination are the first step in identifying the underlying etiology of any symptom. Because symptoms may be a presenting complaint for diverse entities, all patients should have other diagnostic tests to confirm our impression. In our case, a chest radiograph was not useful, and a coronal CT identified the underlying problem: The tortuous descending aorta. It is documented that CT scan is a suitable instrument in thoracic diseases’ evaluation, with its own limitations as all diagnostic procedures.[5611] This case is significant; there are not previous pictorial assays that reported about tortuosity of descending thoracic aorta may cause a misdiagnosis in chest X-ray.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of thoracic abnormalities on 64-row multi-detector row CT: comparison between axial images versus coronal reformations.

Authors:  Mizuki Nishino; Takeshi Kubo; Milliam L Kataoka; Shiva Gautam; Vassilios Raptopoulos; Hiroto Hatabu
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Tortuosity of the descending thoracic aorta simulating dissection on transesophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  E S Katz; R M Applebaum; J P Earls; G Krinsky; J Weinreb; I Kronzon
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.251

3.  Effects of aging on thoracic aorta size and shape: a non-contrast CT study.

Authors:  Damian Craiem; Mariano E Casciaro; Sebastian Graf; Gilles Chironi; Alain Simon; Ricardo L Armentano
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2012

4.  Visceral fat obesity contributes to the tortuosity of the thoracic aorta on chest radiograph in poststroke Japanese patients.

Authors:  Manabu Mochida; Hironosuke Sakamoto; Yoshie Sawada; Hironori Yokoyama; Mahito Sato; Hiroko Sato; Yuko Oyama; Masahiko Kurabayashi; Jun-ichi Tamura; Tetsuo Sakamaki
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 5.  Diagnostic imaging in COPD.

Authors:  George R Washko
Journal:  Semin Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.119

Review 6.  Early detection for lung cancer. New tools for casefinding.

Authors:  S Lam; B Lam; T L Petty
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Gender-related changes in aortic geometry throughout life.

Authors:  Bartosz Rylski; Benoit Desjardins; William Moser; Joseph E Bavaria; Rita K Milewski
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 8.  PET in lung cancer.

Authors:  R E Coleman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 9.  Evaluation of the patient with chronic cough.

Authors:  Robert L Holmes; Clare T Fadden
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 3.292

Review 10.  Pleurisy.

Authors:  Sara M Kass; Pamela M Williams; Brian V Reamy
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 3.292

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.