Literature DB >> 28217352

Crystal structure of a chloride-bridged copper(II) dimer: piperazine-1,4-dium bis-(di-μ-chlorido-bis[(4-carboxypyridine-2-carboxyl-ato-κ2N,O2)chlorido-cuprate(II)].

Bassey Enyi Inah1, Ayi Anyama Ayi1, Amit Adhikary2.   

Abstract

Crystals of a new dimeric chloride-bridged cuprate(II) derived from pyridine-2,4-di-carb-oxy-lic acid were obtained solvothermally in the presence of piperazine and hydro-chloric acid. The crystal structure determination of the title salt, (C4H12N2)[Cu2(C7H4NO4)2Cl4], revealed one of the carboxyl groups of the original pyridine-2,4-di-carb-oxy-lic acid ligand to be protonated, whereas the other is deprotonated and binds together with the pyridine N atom to the CuII atom. The coordination environment of the CuII atom is distorted square-pyramidal. One of the chloride ligands bridges two metal cations to form a centrosymmetric dimer with two different Cu-Cl distances of 2.2632 (8) and 2.7853 (8) Å, whereby the longer distance is associated with the apical ligand. The remaining chloride ligand is terminal at one of the basal positions, with a distance of 2.2272 (9) Å. In the crystal, the dimers are linked by inter-molecular O-H⋯O hydrogen bonds, together with N-H⋯O and N-H⋯Cl inter-actions involving the centrosymmetric organic cation, into a three-dimensional supra-molecular network. Further but weaker C-H⋯O and C-H⋯Cl inter-actions consolidate the packing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  centrosymmetric dimer; coordination polymer; crystal structure; solvothermal synthesis

Year:  2017        PMID: 28217352      PMCID: PMC5290575          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017001013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

In recent times, research on coordination polymers, popularly known as metalorganic frameworks (MOFs), have received great attention, not only for their potential applications in the area of gas storage, ion-exchange, non-linear optics, mol­ecular sieves, catalysis, magnetism, and mol­ecular sensing (Yaghi et al., 2003 ▸; Ockwig et al., 2005 ▸; Wang et al., 2005 ▸; Carlucci et al., 2003 ▸; Hill et al., 2005 ▸), but also for their rich structural chemistry (Li et al., 2016 ▸; Eddaoudi et al., 2015 ▸). In the design of compounds with metalorganic frameworks, versatile carboxyl­ate ligands, derived from 1,4-benzene­dicarb­oxy­lic acid, 1,3,5-benzene­tri­carb­oxy­lic acid, 1,2,4,5-benzene­tetra­carb­oxy­lic acid or pyridine-2,4-di­carb­oxy­lic acid, have frequently been used owing to their abundant carboxyl­ate groups possessing high affinity to metal cations (Li et al., 2004 ▸; Shi et al., 2004 ▸; Gutschke et al., 2001 ▸; Tao et al., 2000 ▸). A number of novel metalorganic frameworks have been constructed using di- or multi­carboxyl­ate ligands as linkers. Most of the reported MOF materials have been synthesized using solvothermal or hydro­thermal synthetic conditions, often by using sealed autoclaves. These techniques have also been found to play an important role in preparing robust and stable inorganic compounds with open frameworks (Rao et al., 2001 ▸; Eddaoudi et al., 2001 ▸). The fact that the solubility of the reactants increases under hydro­thermal methods makes the reaction more likely to occur at lower temperatures, with the formation of polymeric units through mol­ecular building blocks (Zhao et al., 2007 ▸). Small changes in one or more of the reaction variables, such as temperature, time, pH or the solvent type, can have a profound influence on the product. In some cases, organic amines or alkyl­ammonium cations are used as templates and/or structure-directing agents in the crystallization process of framework solids (Jiang et al., 1998 ▸; Cheetham et al., 1999 ▸). In the course of our investigations, we were inter­ested in using pyridine-2,4-di­carb­oxy­lic acid as a source of N- and O-donors, in synthesizing a coordination polymer in an acidic medium under solvothermal conditions and in the presence of piperazine as an organic amine. In this context we report on the synthesis and crystal structure of the title compound (C4H12N2)[Cu2(C7H4NO4)2Cl4], (I).

Structural commentary

The mol­ecular structure of (I) showing the numbering scheme is presented in Fig. 1 ▸. The copper(II) atom is chelated by the O atom (O3) of the deprotonated carb­oxy­lic group and the pyridine N atom (N1) of the organic ligand, forming a five-membered chelate ring Cu1–N1–C1–C6–O3. Two bridging and one terminal chlorido ligands complete the distorted square-pyramidal coordination of the metal cation. The arrangement of the chlorido ligands is such that Cl1 is doubly bridging the two metal cations into a centrosymmetric dimer through edge-sharing. The apical CuCl1(−x + 2, −y + 2, −z + 1) bond length of 2.7853 (9) Å is significantly longer than the other bridging Cu—Cl bond with a length of 2.2632 (8) Å. The square plane is formed by N1 and O3, both from the pyridine-2,4-di­carboxyl­ate anion, Cl1 from the bridging chlorido ligand and Cl2 of the terminal chlorido ligand [2.2272 (9) Å]. This type of coordination has been previously described as a transition state between 4- and 5-coordinate (Qi et al., 2009 ▸). The distortion index (τ) assuming a square-pyramidal environment was calculated as 0.08 using the formula, τ = (β − α)/60 (α, β are the largest valence angles) proposed by Addison et al. (1984 ▸), which indicates only slight distortions from the ideal value where τ = 0. The CuCu distance in the dimer is 3.5946 (9) Å, with an Cu—Cl—Cu bond angle of 90.19 (3)° and a Cl⋯Cl separation of 3.5831 (14) Å. The CuN and Cu—O bond lengths are 2.013 (2) and 1.963 (2) Å, respectively, and are in good agreement with similar compounds reported in the literature (Goddard et al., 1990 ▸; Tynan et al., 2005 ▸; Han et al., 2008 ▸; Liu et al., 2009 ▸; Qi et al., 2009 ▸). The chelate angle O3—CuN1 of 81.34 (9)° is, as expected, smaller than the N1—CuCl1 and O3—CuCl2 bond angles of 170.22 (7) and 165.23 (8)°, respectively. The inorganic anion has a charge of −2 that is compensated by the incorporation of a fully protonated piperazine mol­ecule in the structure. The latter is located about an inversion centre.
Figure 1

The mol­ecular structures of the cationic and anionic components of (I). Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. The non-labelled atoms are related to the labelled atoms by −x + 2, −y + 2, −z + 1;.

Supra­molecular features

The centrosymmetric dimers are linked by pairs of (carbox­yl)O1—H3⋯O4(carboxyl­ate) hydrogen bonds to form sheets parallel (100). The protonated centrosymmetric amine cations are situated between the sheets and are connected through N2—H⋯O2 inter­actions to one of the carbonyl oxygen atoms and various N—H⋯Cl inter­actions into a three-dimensional network (Table 1 ▸, Fig. 2 ▸). The carbonyl oxygen atom O2 also acts as a hydrogen-bond acceptor from pyridyl C—H groups (C2—H2⋯O2 and C4—H12⋯O2). These inter­actions, together with C—H⋯Cl inter­actions, further stabilize the three-dimensional supra­molecular network structure.
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H3⋯O4i 0.821.792.603 (3)171
N2—H2A⋯Cl1ii 0.892.783.562 (3)147
N2—H2A⋯O3ii 0.892.222.861 (3)129
N2—H2B⋯Cl1iii 0.892.693.414 (3)139
N2—H2B⋯Cl2iii 0.892.693.360 (3)133
C2—H2⋯O2iv 0.932.493.402 (4)169
C4—H12⋯O2v 0.932.563.362 (4)145
C5—H13⋯Cl20.932.713.269 (3)119
C8—H27A⋯Cl1vi 0.972.723.561 (3)146
C8—H27B⋯Cl2vii 0.972.813.599 (3)139
C9—H26A⋯O2viii 0.972.563.509 (4)165
C9—H26B⋯Cl1vi 0.972.933.713 (3)139
C9—H26B⋯Cl2iii 0.972.933.491 (4)118

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) ; (vi) ; (vii) ; (viii) .

Figure 2

The crystal structure of (I), showing O—H⋯O, N—H⋯O and N—H⋯Cl hydrogen-bonding inter­actions as dashed lines (see Table 1 ▸ for numerical details).

Database survey

There are several copper(II) dimeric compounds in which the copper atoms are bridged by chlorido ligands (Marsh et al., 1983 ▸; Puschmann et al., 2001 ▸; Li et al., 2006 ▸; Lee, et al., 2008 ▸; Han et al., 2008 ▸; Øien et al., 2013 ▸; Choubey et al., 2015 ▸; Golchoubian & Nateghi 2016 ▸; Liu et al., 2009 ▸). A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (Version 5.38, November 2016; Groom et al., 2016 ▸), revealed numerous di-μ-chlorido bridged copper(II) compounds constructed with ligands having -N,O- donor atoms (Kapoor et al., 2002 ▸, 2004 ▸; Damous et al., 2013 ▸; Lumb et al., 2013 ▸; Smolentsev et al., 2014 ▸; Qureshi et al., 2016 ▸). However, the search did not reveal related complexes derived from pyridine-2,4-di­carb­oxy­lic acid and piperazine.

Synthesis and crystallization

The syntheses were carried out in Ace pressure tubes (15 cm3) and heated in programmable ovens. The reagents used for syntheses were obtained from Aldrich (Analar grade) and used without further purification. In a typical synthesis of (I), Cu(CH3COO)2·2H2O (0.1996 g, 1.0 mmol) was stirred together with pyridine-2,4-di­carb­oxy­lic acid (0.1671 g, 1.0 mmol) in 3.3 cm3 of n-butanol. This was followed by the addition of piperazine (0.940 g, 1.0 mmol) and the pH of the solution was adjusted to 2 by dropwise addition of 0.16 cm3 of conc. HCl. The resultant mixture was homogenized for 15 min before transferring into the reaction vessel and heated in an oven at 393 K for 48 h. The product, a crop of bluish crystalline material, was washed with distilled water and air-dried.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. C-bound H atoms were treated as riding atoms, with C—H distances of 0.93 Å (aromatic) and 0.97 Å (aliphatic), and with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C). N- and O-bound H atoms were located in difference maps and were refined with N—H distances of 0.89 Å and O—H distances of 0.82 Å, and with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(N) and U iso(H) = 1.5U eq(O), respectively.
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula(C4H12N2)[Cu2(C7H4NO4)2Cl4]
M r 689.26
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)298
a, b, c (Å)11.639 (3), 9.224 (2), 11.423 (3)
β (°)105.211 (3)
V3)1183.4 (5)
Z 2
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)2.30
Crystal size (mm)0.05 × 0.02 × 0.02
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART APEX CCD area detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008)
T min, T max 0.946, 0.955
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections14235, 2923, 2392
R int 0.050
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.666
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.039, 0.127, 0.86
No. of reflections2923
No. of parameters164
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.55, −0.31

Computer programs: SMART and SAINT (Bruker, 2008 ▸), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017001013/wm5354sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017001013/wm5354Isup2.hkl CCDC reference: 1497751 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
(C4H12N2)[Cu2(C7H4NO4)2Cl4]F(000) = 692
Mr = 689.26Dx = 1.934 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 11.639 (3) ÅCell parameters from 1016 reflections
b = 9.224 (2) Åθ = 2.9–26.8°
c = 11.423 (3) ŵ = 2.30 mm1
β = 105.211 (3)°T = 298 K
V = 1183.4 (5) Å3Rod, blue
Z = 20.05 × 0.02 × 0.02 mm
Bruker SMART APEX CCD area detector diffractometer2392 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
ω scansRint = 0.050
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008)θmax = 28.3°, θmin = 2.9°
Tmin = 0.946, Tmax = 0.955h = −15→15
14235 measured reflectionsk = −12→12
2923 independent reflectionsl = −15→15
Refinement on F20 restraints
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.039H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.127w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 0.86(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
2923 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.55 e Å3
164 parametersΔρmin = −0.31 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cu10.84456 (3)1.01123 (4)0.42216 (3)0.02632 (15)
Cl10.99944 (6)1.14015 (7)0.39127 (7)0.02963 (19)
Cl20.82884 (8)0.86943 (9)0.26090 (7)0.0431 (2)
O30.82154 (19)1.1592 (2)0.5374 (2)0.0326 (5)
O40.7301 (2)1.2063 (2)0.6797 (2)0.0411 (6)
N10.7122 (2)0.9149 (2)0.4767 (2)0.0244 (5)
O10.4230 (2)0.8203 (3)0.7170 (2)0.0412 (6)
H30.3793340.7765660.7506920.062*
C60.7489 (2)1.1293 (3)0.5993 (3)0.0259 (6)
N20.9556 (2)0.0777 (3)0.0881 (2)0.0358 (6)
H2A0.9595880.1694300.0652880.043*
H2B0.9267780.0773350.1529680.043*
C10.6847 (3)0.9859 (3)0.5683 (3)0.0246 (6)
O20.4234 (2)0.6091 (3)0.6208 (2)0.0468 (6)
C20.6029 (2)0.9326 (3)0.6261 (3)0.0261 (6)
H20.5845060.9837580.6889740.031*
C81.0765 (3)0.0148 (3)0.1210 (3)0.0323 (7)
H27A1.073784−0.0810470.1550930.039*
H27B1.1284100.0747580.1824560.039*
C70.4583 (3)0.7319 (3)0.6429 (3)0.0310 (6)
C40.5776 (3)0.7273 (3)0.4928 (3)0.0308 (6)
H120.5425100.6385920.4657170.037*
C50.6597 (3)0.7892 (3)0.4394 (3)0.0294 (6)
H130.6786950.7412110.3753460.035*
C30.5487 (3)0.7998 (3)0.5872 (3)0.0268 (6)
C90.8733 (3)−0.0041 (3)−0.0119 (3)0.0367 (7)
H26A0.7967760.044487−0.0348590.044*
H26B0.861083−0.1007610.0160750.044*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu10.0282 (2)0.0222 (2)0.0335 (2)−0.00475 (12)0.01701 (17)−0.00548 (13)
Cl10.0306 (4)0.0252 (3)0.0368 (4)−0.0053 (3)0.0155 (3)0.0021 (3)
Cl20.0595 (5)0.0385 (4)0.0410 (5)−0.0166 (4)0.0305 (4)−0.0152 (3)
O30.0350 (11)0.0255 (10)0.0437 (12)−0.0075 (9)0.0215 (10)−0.0092 (9)
O40.0424 (13)0.0372 (12)0.0520 (14)−0.0066 (10)0.0272 (11)−0.0194 (10)
N10.0249 (11)0.0239 (12)0.0270 (11)−0.0007 (9)0.0112 (9)−0.0022 (9)
O10.0441 (14)0.0401 (13)0.0497 (14)−0.0112 (11)0.0306 (12)−0.0032 (11)
C60.0219 (13)0.0217 (13)0.0348 (15)−0.0001 (10)0.0086 (11)−0.0051 (11)
N20.0454 (15)0.0311 (14)0.0334 (13)0.0120 (12)0.0150 (12)0.0001 (11)
C10.0209 (12)0.0247 (14)0.0281 (14)0.0024 (10)0.0064 (11)−0.0005 (10)
O20.0573 (16)0.0355 (12)0.0581 (16)−0.0167 (11)0.0337 (13)−0.0040 (11)
C20.0238 (13)0.0291 (14)0.0264 (13)−0.0003 (11)0.0085 (11)−0.0007 (11)
C80.0422 (18)0.0228 (14)0.0280 (15)0.0016 (12)0.0027 (14)−0.0002 (11)
C70.0290 (14)0.0344 (16)0.0291 (14)−0.0046 (12)0.0068 (12)0.0058 (12)
C40.0309 (15)0.0276 (14)0.0350 (15)−0.0075 (12)0.0106 (13)−0.0022 (12)
C50.0320 (15)0.0288 (15)0.0300 (14)−0.0037 (12)0.0130 (12)−0.0053 (11)
C30.0240 (13)0.0276 (14)0.0291 (14)0.0002 (11)0.0076 (11)0.0037 (11)
C90.0313 (17)0.0374 (18)0.0416 (19)0.0024 (12)0.0099 (15)0.0037 (13)
Cu1—O31.963 (2)N2—H2B0.8900
Cu1—N12.013 (2)C1—C21.384 (4)
Cu1—Cl22.2272 (9)O2—C71.207 (4)
Cu1—Cl12.2632 (8)C2—C31.396 (4)
Cu1—Cl1i2.7853 (9)C2—H20.9300
O3—C61.267 (3)C8—C9ii1.512 (5)
O4—C61.225 (3)C8—H27A0.9700
N1—C51.327 (4)C8—H27B0.9700
N1—C11.343 (4)C7—C31.502 (4)
O1—C71.316 (4)C4—C31.383 (4)
O1—H30.8200C4—C51.385 (4)
C6—C11.515 (4)C4—H120.9300
N2—C81.476 (4)C5—H130.9300
N2—C91.490 (4)C9—H26A0.9700
N2—H2A0.8900C9—H26B0.9700
O3—Cu1—N181.34 (9)C3—C2—H2121.0
O3—Cu1—Cl2165.23 (8)N2—C8—C9ii111.4 (3)
N1—Cu1—Cl295.35 (7)N2—C8—H27A109.4
O3—Cu1—Cl189.63 (6)C9ii—C8—H27A109.4
N1—Cu1—Cl1170.22 (7)N2—C8—H27B109.4
Cl2—Cu1—Cl194.33 (3)C9ii—C8—H27B109.4
C6—O3—Cu1116.83 (18)H27A—C8—H27B108.0
C5—N1—C1119.5 (2)O2—C7—O1124.8 (3)
C5—N1—Cu1127.7 (2)O2—C7—C3122.5 (3)
C1—N1—Cu1112.59 (18)O1—C7—C3112.7 (3)
C7—O1—H3109.5C3—C4—C5118.7 (3)
O4—C6—O3124.7 (3)C3—C4—H12120.6
O4—C6—C1120.5 (3)C5—C4—H12120.6
O3—C6—C1114.8 (2)N1—C5—C4122.1 (3)
C8—N2—C9112.0 (2)N1—C5—H13118.9
C8—N2—H2A109.2C4—C5—H13118.9
C9—N2—H2A109.2C4—C3—C2119.4 (3)
C8—N2—H2B109.2C4—C3—C7118.0 (3)
C9—N2—H2B109.2C2—C3—C7122.6 (3)
H2A—N2—H2B107.9N2—C9—C8ii110.8 (3)
N1—C1—C2122.2 (3)N2—C9—H26A109.5
N1—C1—C6113.9 (3)C8ii—C9—H26A109.5
C2—C1—C6123.9 (3)N2—C9—H26B109.5
C1—C2—C3118.0 (3)C8ii—C9—H26B109.5
C1—C2—H2121.0H26A—C9—H26B108.1
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H3···O4iii0.821.792.603 (3)171
N2—H2A···Cl1iv0.892.783.562 (3)147
N2—H2A···O3iv0.892.222.861 (3)129
N2—H2B···Cl1v0.892.693.414 (3)139
N2—H2B···Cl2v0.892.693.360 (3)133
C2—H2···O2vi0.932.493.402 (4)169
C4—H12···O2vii0.932.563.362 (4)145
C5—H13···Cl20.932.713.269 (3)119
C8—H27A···Cl1viii0.972.723.561 (3)146
C8—H27B···Cl2ix0.972.813.599 (3)139
C9—H26A···O2x0.972.563.509 (4)165
C9—H26B···Cl1viii0.972.933.713 (3)139
C9—H26B···Cl2v0.972.933.491 (4)118
  17 in total

1.  Reticular synthesis and the design of new materials.

Authors:  Omar M Yaghi; Michael O'Keeffe; Nathan W Ockwig; Hee K Chae; Mohamed Eddaoudi; Jaheon Kim
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Reticular chemistry: occurrence and taxonomy of nets and grammar for the design of frameworks.

Authors:  Nathan W Ockwig; Olaf Delgado-Friedrichs; Michael O'Keeffe; Omar M Yaghi
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 22.384

3.  Ternary nets formed by self-assembly of triangles, squares, and tetrahedra.

Authors:  Zhenqiang Wang; Victor Ch Kravtsov; Michael J Zaworotko
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2005-05-06       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  New approaches to the analysis of high connectivity materials: design frameworks based upon 4(4)- and 6(3)-subnet tectons.

Authors:  Robert J Hill; De-Liang Long; Neil R Champness; Peter Hubberstey; Martin Schröder
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 22.384

5.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

6.  Modular chemistry: secondary building units as a basis for the design of highly porous and robust metal-organic carboxylate frameworks.

Authors:  M Eddaoudi; D B Moler; H Li; B Chen; T M Reineke; M O'Keeffe; O M Yaghi
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 22.384

7.  Structural, electronic, and magnetic consequences of O-carbonyl vs O-alkoxy ester coordination in new dicopper complexes containing the Cu2(mu-Cl)2 core.

Authors:  Pratibha Kapoor; Anuradha Pathak; Ramesh Kapoor; Paloth Venugopalan; Montserrat Corbella; Montserrat Rodríguez; Juvencio Robles; Antoni Llobet
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2002-11-18       Impact factor: 5.165

8.  Open-Framework Inorganic Materials.

Authors: 
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 15.336

9.  Aufbau principle of complex open-framework structures of metal phosphates with different dimensionalities.

Authors:  C N Rao; S Natarajan; A Choudhury; S Neeraj; A A Ayi
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 22.384

10.  Di-μ-chlorido-bis-[chlorido(N,N'-dibenzyl-propane-1,2-diamine-κN,N')copper(II)].

Authors:  Yu-Fen Liu; Da-Fu Rong; Hai-Tao Xia; Da-Qi Wang
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.