| Literature DB >> 28217124 |
Hideyuki Ihara1, Tomoyuki Hori2, Tomo Aoyagi2, Mitsuru Takasaki3, Yoko Katayama4.
Abstract
A large amount of marine sediment was launched on land by the Great East Japan earthquake. Here, we employed both on-site and laboratory studies on the launched marine sediment to investigate the succession of microbial communities and its effects on geochemical properties of the sediment. Twenty-two-month on-site survey showed that microbial communities at the uppermost layer (0-2 mm depth) of the sediment changed significantly with time, whereas those at the deeper layer (20-40 mm depth) remained nearly unchanged and kept anaerobic microbial communities. Nine months after the incidence, various sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (SOB) prevailed in the uppermost layer, in which afterwards diverse chemoorganotrophic bacteria predominated. Geochemical analyses indicated that the concentration of metals other than Fe was lower in the uppermost layer than that in the deeper layer. Laboratory study was carried out by incubating the sediment for 57 days, and clearly indicated the dynamic transition of microbial communities in the uppermost layer exposed to atmosphere. SOB affiliated in the class Epsilonproteobacteria rapidly proliferated and dominated at the uppermost layer during the first 3 days, after that Fe(II)-oxidizing bacteria and chemoorganotrophic bacteria were sequentially dominant. Furthermore, the concentration of sulfate ion increased and the pH decreased. Consequently, SOB may have influenced the mobilization of heavy metals in the sediment by metal-bound sulfide oxidation and/or sediment acidification. These results demonstrate that SOB initiated the dynamic shift from the anaerobic to aerobic microbial communities, thereby playing a critical role in element cycling in the marine sediment.Entities:
Keywords: Epsilonproteobacteria; high-throughput sequencing; launched marine sediment; microbial community; sulfur-oxidizing bacteria
Year: 2017 PMID: 28217124 PMCID: PMC5289976 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00152
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Microbial community structures in the uppermost (0–2 mm depth) and deep (20–40 mm depth) layers of the on-site sediments based on the 16S rRNA gene analysis (. The bars indicate average values of three replications. Sediment samples were collected in December 2011, March 2012 and October 2013. (A) Microbial communities are categorized by phylum except for Proteobacteria that is shown by class. The fraction of the dominant phylotypes (>3% of each library) in the classes Gammproteobacteria (B), Epsilonproteobacteria (C), and Deltaproteobacteria (D) are shown in the histograms.
Changes of IL and ion concentrations in the on-site sediment.
| Dec. 2011 | 11.7 ± 1.5 | 8232 ± 2074 | 1780 ± 933 | 1963 ± 786 | 4000 ± 2545 | 12,570 ± 1504 | 5054 ± 683 |
| Mar. 2012 | 11.4 ± 0.9 | 11,743 ± 4195 | 1008 ± 291 | 1473 ± 84 | 2391 ± 1205 | 16,081 ± 6564 | 4752 ± 1324 |
| Oct. 2013 | 10.2 ± 0.3 | 4473 ± 1264 | 884 ± 113 | 935 ± 120 | 2447 ± 1094 | 5461 ± 1418 | 6827 ± 1882 |
The deep (20–40 mm depth) layer sediments were used for the analysis. The symbol “±” means the standard deviation of three replications. There was the significant difference in Cl.
Changes of metal concentrations in the on-site sediment.
| Uppermost | Mar. 2012 | 15,650 | 10,626 | 60,561 | 5642 | 8173 | 148,088 |
| Deep | Dec. 2011 | 16,673 ± 808 | 17,045 ± 398 | 113,292 ± 4022 | 8912 ± 182 | 10,242 ± 38 | 72,139 ± 3467 |
| Mar. 2012 | 20,477 ± 1426 | 18,130 ± 710 | 115,629 ± 2808 | 9083 ± 118 | 9600 ± 343 | 73,939 ± 1514 | |
| Oct. 2013 | 12,035 ± 1367 | 15,440 ± 1649 | 102,379 ± 11,373 | 8456 ± 722 | 9546 ± 865 | 69,636 ± 5783 | |
| Uppermost | Mar. 2012 | 30.7 | 44 | 32.5 | 1.8 | 0.19 | 30.5 |
| Deep | Dec. 2011 | 57.2 ± 1.7 | 123 ± 0.3 | 47.8 ± 1.7 | 2.5 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.0 | 52.1 ± 0.4 |
| Mar. 2012 | 57.6 ± 1.6 | 120 ± 4.1 | 47.7 ± 1.4 | 3.0 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 50.1 ± 0.6 | |
| Oct. 2013 | 53.1 ± 5.2 | 118 ± 11.1 | 43 ± 2.8 | 2.8 ± 0.5 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 53.3 ± 0.4 | |
Sediment sample was collected at 0–2 mm depth from the surface. The measurement was conducted in singlicate because the quantity of obtained sample was small.
Sediment samples were collected at 20–40 mm depth from the surface (n = 2) and the symbol “±” means the variation between two replications.
Figure 2Comparison of microbial community structures in the uppermost (0–2 mm depth, red) and deep (12–16 mm depth, blue) layers of the sediments incubated in laboratory based on principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) (. These plots were calculated from an equal number of sequences (31 950) by weighted UniFrac analysis. ♦, before incubation (Day 0); ◦, Day 1; Δ, Day 3; □, Day 7; ×, Day 14; +, Day 28; –, Day 57. Arrows indicate the trajectory of the community structure change in the uppermost layer.
Figure 3Transition of microbial community structures in the uppermost (0–2 mm depth) and deep (12–16 mm depth) layers of the sediments incubated in laboratory (. The bars indicate average values of three replications. Microbial communities in the deep layers (except for that at day 57) were not exhibited because the community structures were quite similar during the incubation period. (A) Microbial communities are categorized by phylum except for Proteobacteria that is shown by class. The fraction of the dominant phylotypes (>3% of each library) in the classes Epsilonproteobacteria (B) and Gammaproteobacteria (C) are shown in the histograms.
Most abundant OTUs and their closely related species found in the uppermost layer of the sediment incubated in laboratory.
| 1 | 43060 | 98 | Epsilonproteobacteria | 14.4 ± 0.3 | <0.001 | SO, NR | ||
| 42344 | 92 | Epsilonproteobacteria | 9.7 ± 0.3 | <0.001 | Unknown | |||
| 25387 | 96 | Epsilonproteobacteria | 9.2 ± 0.4 | <0.001 | SO, NR | |||
| 49085 | 90 | Epsilonproteobacteria | 2.9 ± 0.5 | 0.002 | Unknown | |||
| 27532 | 95 | Epsilonproteobacteria | 1.6 ± 0.6 | 0.04 | Unknown | |||
| 49878 | 92 | Deltaproteobacteria | 1.6 ± 0.0 | 0.005 | Unknown | |||
| 21731 | 100 | Gammaproteobacteria | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 0.001 | SO | |||
| 3 | 42344 | 92 | Epsilonproteobacteria | 30.7 ± 6.4 | 0.001 | Unknown | ||
| 25387 | 96 | Epsilonproteobacteria | 9.0 ± 3.4 | 0.01 | SO, NR | |||
| 43060 | 98 | Epsilonproteobacteria | 8.0 ± 2.1 | 0.005 | SO, NR | |||
| 49085 | 90 | Epsilonproteobacteria | 4.1 ± 0.8 | 0.003 | Unknown | |||
| 32337 | 96 | Zetaproteobacteria | 3.9 ± 0.2 | <0.001 | FeO | |||
| 36501 | 100 | Gammaproteobacteria | 3.7 ± 0.9 | 0.002 | SO | |||
| 30483 | 98 | Epsilonproteobacteria | 2.7 ± 1.1 | 0.02 | SO, NR | |||
| 14 | 45161 | 98 | Gammaproteobacteria | 18.3 ± 1.9 | <0.001 | SO, NR | ||
| 32337 | 96 | Zetaproteobacteria | 4.8 ± 0.8 | <0.001 | FeO | |||
| 6816 | 97 | Betaproteobacteria | 4.0 ± 0.2 | <0.001 | FeO | |||
| 42344 | 92 | Epsilonproteobacteria | 3.9 ± 0.6 | 0.001 | Unknown | |||
| 6961 | 100 | Gammaproteobacteria | 3.4 ± 2.1 | 0.05 | ChemO | |||
| 30483 | 98 | Epsilonproteobacteria | 3.1 ± 0.4 | <0.001 | SO, NR | |||
| 16111 | 96 | Gammaproteobacteria | 2.9 ± 0.5 | 0.001 | SO, NR | |||
| 57 | 45161 | 98 | Gammaproteobacteria | 9.0 ± 1.7 | 0.001 | SO, NR | ||
| 24485 | 99 | Actinobacteria | 8.1 ± 2.5 | 0.005 | ChemO, NR | |||
| 908 | 93 | Gammaproteobacteria | 5.9 ± 1.7 | 0.004 | Unknown | |||
| 23047 | 98 | Gammaproteobacteria | 4.8 ± 1.2 | 0.002 | ChemO, NR | |||
| 30112 | 92 | Gammaproteobacteria | 3.0 ± 1.2 | 0.01 | Unknown | |||
| 45198 | 96 | Gammaproteobacteria | 2.6 ± 0.7 | 0.003 | SO, NR | |||
| 6961 | 100 | Gammaproteobacteria | 2.4 ± 0.4 | 0.001 | ChemO |
The closely related species were assigned on BLAST in the DDBJ.
The OTUs were characterized phylogenetically by using the QIIME software.
The symbol “±” means the standard deviation of three replications.
p-values indicate whether the relative abundance of OTU was significantly high comparing with that in the deep layer:
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01.
The putative function of closely related species (only sequence similarities >95%). SO, sulfur oxidation; SR, sulfate reduction; FeO, Fe(II) oxidation; ChemO, chemoorganotrophy; NR, nitrate reduction.
Figure 4Time-course changes in sulfate ion concentration (open circles) and pH (filled circles) of the sediments incubated in laboratory. Solid and dotted lines indicate data in the uppermost (0–2 mm depth) and deep (12–16 mm depth) layers of the sediments. Error bars indicate standard deviations of four replications. Only sulfate ion concentrations in the uppermost layers at days 1 and 57 were conducted in triplicate.