| Literature DB >> 28217111 |
Ryan de Montmollin Jennings1, James J Moran2, Zackary J Jay1, Jacob P Beam1, Laura M Whitmore2, Mark A Kozubal3, Helen W Kreuzer2, William P Inskeep1.
Abstract
Although the biological fixation of CO2 by chemolithoautotrophs provides a diverse suite of organic compounds utilized by chemoorganoheterotrophs as a carbon and energy source, the relative amounts of autotrophic C in chemotrophic microbial communities are not well-established. The extent and mechanisms of CO2 fixation were evaluated across a comprehensive set of high-temperature, chemotrophic microbial communities in Yellowstone National Park by combining metagenomic and stable 13C isotope analyses. Fifteen geothermal sites representing three distinct habitat types (iron-oxide mats, anoxic sulfur sediments, and filamentous "streamer" communities) were investigated. Genes of the 3-hydroxypropionate/4-hydroxybutyrate, dicarboxylate/4-hydroxybutyrate, and reverse tricarboxylic acid CO2 fixation pathways were identified in assembled genome sequence corresponding to the predominant Crenarchaeota and Aquificales observed across this habitat range. Stable 13C analyses of dissolved inorganic and organic C (DIC, DOC), and possible landscape C sources were used to interpret the 13C content of microbial community samples. Isotope mixing models showed that the minimum fractions of autotrophic C in microbial biomass were >50% in the majority of communities analyzed. The significance of CO2 as a C source in these communities provides a foundation for understanding community assembly and succession, and metabolic linkages among early-branching thermophilic autotrophs and heterotrophs.Entities:
Keywords: Aquificales; CO2 fixation; Crenarchaeota; autotrophy; geothermal; stable C isotopes
Year: 2017 PMID: 28217111 PMCID: PMC5289995 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00088
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Key geochemical parameters, and .
| Crater Hills | 2 | 76 | 0.13 | 0.21 | 5.4 (0.2, 2) | −23.8 (0.2, 3) | −20.3 (0.7, 17) |
| Joseph's Coat 2 E | 2.2 | 79 | 3.36 | 0.06 | −5.4 (0.1, 2) | −23.9 (1.5, 2) | −16.1 (0.5, 7) |
| Monarch Geyser | 3.8 | 83 | 1.15 | 0.05 | −3.9 (0.8, 4) | −17.6 (1.8, 4) | −5.9 (1.1, 39) |
| Cistern Spring | 4.5 | 79 | 0.67 | 0.04 | −4.3 (0.6, 4) | −18.3 (1.5, 4) | −18.6 (3.6, 47) |
| Josephs Coat 3 A | 6.1 | 87 | 0.38 | 0.05 | −2.4 (0.2, 2) | −16.9 (0.2, 2) | −13.8 (1.0, 9) |
| Washburn Spring | 6.2 | 72 | 3.85 | 1.01 | 0.6 (0.5, 2) | −22.3 (0.7, 2) | −23.4 (0.4, 9) |
| Joseph's Coat 2 B | 2.2 | 80 | 0.05 | 0.05 | −3.4 (1.4, 4) | −23.7 (1.1, 5) | −8.3 (0.5, 7) |
| Beowulf Spring D | 2.9 | 68 | 1.02 | 0.05 | −3.2 (3.1, 8) | −22.7 (1.4, 8) | −15.4 (1.5, 41) |
| Grendel Spring D | 3.4 | 70 | 0.2 | 0.06 | −3.9 (0.6, 4) | −21.7 (0.6, 4) | −16.3 (0.7, 15) |
| Echinus Geyser B | 3.5 | 68 | 0.26 | 0.03 | −4.4 (0.4, 5) | −22.4 (1.0, 5) | −11.5 (0.8, 32) |
| 100 Springs Plain B | 3.5 | 74 | 0.23 | 0.06 | −3.7 (2.9, 8) | −22.9 (2.3, 8) | −14.5 (1.6, 22) |
| Dragon Spring B | 3 | 75 | 1.62 | 0.05 | −3.4 (0.3, 2) | −23.9 (0.9, 2) | −9.1 (0.8, 7) |
| Narrow Gauge | 6.3 | 72 | 13.16 | 0.07 | 1.2 (1.2, 4) | −20.8 (3.5, 4) | −11.9 (0.6, 22) |
| Octopus Spring B | 8.1 | 84 | 5.19 | 0.02 | −1.9 (0.2, 7) | −23.0 (1.7, 7) | −16.3 (0.6, 13) |
| Conch Spring B | 9.4 | 85 | 3.43 | 0.02 | −2.5 (0.2, 9) | −21.8 (3.4, 9) | −4.5 (2.6, 9) |
δ.
Site locations (GPS coordinates) and more detailed information on sampling dates are provided in Table .
Standard deviation and n are based on total number of sample and machine replicates, and include samples obtained at different sampling dates, when appropriate (Table .
Relative abundance of primary autotrophs distributed across different geothermal habitats in Yellowstone National Park and predicted fractionation factors (ε) for the three major carbon dioxide fixation pathways observed in these populations.
| 5.5 | 15.9 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 29.7 | ||||||||||
| 5.5 | 2 | 94.3 | |||||||||||||
| 3.3 | 3.6 | 1.2 | 23.4 | 39.5 | |||||||||||
| 0.2 | 10.8 | ||||||||||||||
| 2.5 | 3 | 7.2 | 9.7 | 13.2 | |||||||||||
| 0.2 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.5 | |||||||||||
| Sulfolobales T1 | 3.1 | 68.9 | 1.6 | 9.4 | 4.2 | 0.1 | 6.1 | ||||||||
| Sulfolobales T2 | 3.6 | 7.9 | 0.8 | 84.5 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 1.1 | ||||||||
| Thermoproteales T1 | 2 | 11.8 | 26.2 | 19.5 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 4.7 | 11.8 | 6.6 | ||||||
| Thermoproteales T2 | 2.9 | 2 | 23.6 | 34.2 | 4.3 | 9.2 | 20.3 | ||||||||
Candidate autotrophs established based on presence of CO.
Fractionation factors (ε, %) estimated based on cultured relatives.
CH, Crater Hills; JC2_E, Joseph's Coat Spring 2; MG, Monarch Geyser; CIS, Cistern Spring; JC3_A, Joseph's Coat Spring 3; WSH, Washburn Hot Spring; DS, Dragon Spring; NG, Narrow Gauge; OCT, Octopus Spring; CON, Conch Spring; BE, Beowulf East; GRN, Grendel Spring; ECH, Echinus Geyser; OSP, 100 Spring Plain (see Table .
Relative abundance values are based on metagenome read recruitment to de novo phylotype genomes, unless otherwise noted.
Relative abundance estimates based on iTag data.
Other community members are identified in Supplemental Information (Table .
Figure 1Stable carbon isotope contents (δ.
Figure 2Stable . The fraction of microbial C of DIC origin relative to total microbial C (fMicrobial-DIC) (x-axis) and the fraction of microbial C to total sample C (fMicrobial-C) (y-axis) were used to model (Equation 1) the distribution of possible sample 13C contents (gray scale). Dotted lines indicate possible combinations of fMicrobial-DIC and fMicrobial-C that are consistent with the observed 13C values (‰) of microbial samples (boxed).
Figure 3Stable . The fraction of microbial C of DIC origin relative to total microbial C (fMicrobial-DIC) (x-axis) and the fraction of microbial C to total sample C (fMicrobial-C) (y-axis) were used to model (Equation 1) the distribution of possible sample 13C contents (gray scale). Dotted lines indicate possible combinations of fMicrobial-DIC and fMicrobial-C that are consistent with the observed 13C values (‰) of microbial samples (boxed).
Figure 4Stable . The fraction of microbial C of DIC origin relative to total microbial C (fMicrobial-DIC) (x-axis) and the fraction of microbial C to total sample C (fMicrobial-C) (y-axis) were used to model (Equation 1) the distribution of possible sample 13C contents (gray scale). Dotted lines indicate possible combinations of fMicrobial-DIC and fMicrobial-C that are consistent with the observed 13C values (‰) of microbial samples (boxed).