| Literature DB >> 28216591 |
Pengbao Shi1,2, Bing Li3, Haiju Chen4, Changzheng Song5, Jiangfei Meng6, Zhumei Xi7,8, Zhenwen Zhang9,10.
Abstract
Anthocyanins are important compounds for red grape and red wine quality, and can be influenced by supply of nutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, zinc, and iron. The present work aims to gain a better understanding of the effect of iron supply on anthocyanins concentration in grape berries. To this end, own-rooted four-year-old Cabernet Sauvignon grapevines (Vitis vinifera) were fertigated every three days with 0, 23, 46, 92, and 184 μM iron (Fe) from ferric ethylenediamine di (o-hydroxyphenylacetic) acid (Fe-EDDHA) in a complete nutrient solution. Fe deficiency or excess generally led to higher concentrations of titratable acidity and skin/berry ratio, and to lower reducing sugar content, sugar/acid ratio, pH, berry weight, and concentration of anthocyanins. Most of the individual anthocyanins detected in this study, except cyanidin-3-O-glucoside, delphinidin-3-O-glucoside, and cyanidin-3-O-(6-O-coumaryl)-glucoside, in moderate Fe treatment (46 μM) grapes were significantly higher than those of other treatments. Genes encoding chalcone isomerase (CHI), flavanone 3-hydroxylase (F3H), leucoanthocyanidin dioxygenase (LDOX), and anthocyanin O-methyltransferase (AOMT) exhibited higher transcript levels in berries from plants cultivated with 46 μM Fe compared to the ones cultivated with other Fe concentrations. We suggest that grape sugar content, anthocyanins content, and transcriptions of genes involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis were correlated with Fe supply concentrations.Entities:
Keywords: anthocyanins; gene expression; grape berry; iron; sugar
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28216591 PMCID: PMC6155850 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22020283
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Physical and chemical analyses of Cabernet Sauvignon berries and grape juice sampled from each iron supply treatment. RS = Reducing Sugar (expressed in gram equivalent glucose L−1), TAC = Titratable Acid Content (expressed in gram equivalent tartaric acid L−1). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments as calculated by Tukey’s HSD test (p < 0.05).
| Treatments | T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RS | 161.67 ± 0.85d | 173.56 ± 0.49b | 182.26 ± 0.54a | 168.86 ± 0.46c | 117.81 ± 0.22e |
| TAC | 7.87 ± 0.09b | 4.61 ± 0.05d | 3.31 ± 0.02e | 4.95 ± 0.06c | 9.58 ± 0.11a |
| RS/TAC | 20.55 ± 0.12d | 37.63 ± 0.32b | 55.03 ± 0.23a | 34.10 ± 0.29c | 12.30 ± 0.12e |
| pH | 3.69 ± 0.04c | 4.23 ± 0.02ab | 4.35 ± 0.03a | 4.11 ± 0.05b | 3.45 ± 0.04d |
| Berry weight (g) | 0.79 ± 0.04b | 0.69 ± 0.02b | 0.89 ± 0.02a | 0.71 ± 0.02b | 0.57 ± 0.03c |
| Skin/berry (%) | 9.41 ± 0.22a | 8.51 ± 0.59a | 8.31 ± 0.44a | 9.47 ± 0.29a | 9.10 ± 0.08a |
Characterization of anthocyanin compounds in berry skins using HPLC-DAD-MS.
| Peak | Retention Time (min) | Molecular Ion M+ ( | Fragment Ion M ( | Tentative Identification | Abbreviations Used | Ref.(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.44 | 465 | 303 | delphinidin-3- | Dp | [ |
| 2 | 6.27 | 449 | 287 | cyanidin-3- | Cy | [ |
| 3 | 7.44 | 479 | 317 | petunidin-3- | Pt | [ |
| 4 | 10.04 | 463 | 301 | peonidin-3- | Pn | [ |
| 5 | 11.13 | 493 | 331 | malvidin-3- | Mv | [ |
| 6 | 12.65 | 507 | 303, 465 | delphinidin-3- | Dp-acet | [ |
| 7 | 16.11 | 491 | 287, 449 | cyanidin-3- | Cy-acet | [ |
| 8 | 17.60 | 521 | 317, 479 | petunidin-3- | Pt-acet | [ |
| 9 | 18.52 | 611 | 303, 465 | delphinidin-3- | Dp-coum | [ |
| 10 | 21.35 | 505 | 301, 463 | peonidin-3- | Pn-acet | [ |
| 11 | 22.32 | 535 | 331, 493 | malvidin-3- | Mv-acet | [ |
| 12 | 24.52 | 625 | 301, 463 | peonidin-3- | Pn-caff | [ |
| 13 | 25.01 | 595 | 287, 449 | cyanidin-3- | Cy-coum | [ |
| 14 | 25.52 | 655 | 331, 493 | malvidin-3-(6- | Mv-caff | [ |
| 15 | 26.30 | 625 | 317, 479 | petunidin-3- | Pt-coum | [ |
| 16 | 27.51 | 609 | 301, 463 | peonidin-3- | cPn-coum | [ |
| 17 | 28.09 | 639 | 331, 493 | Malvidin-3- | cMv-coum | [ |
| 18 | 29.45 | 609 | 301, 463 | peonidin-3- | tPn-coum | [ |
| 19 | 29.98 | 639 | 331, 493 | malvidin-3- | tMv-coum | [ |
Effects of iron supply on individual anthocyanins (μg/g berry) in grape berries. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments as calculated by Tukey’s HSD test (p < 0.05).
| Anthocyanins | T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dp | 7.39 ± 0.23e | 19.06 ± 0.30a | 17.20 ± 0.04b | 11.90 ± 0.02d | 15.35 ± 0.02c |
| Cy | 1.74 ± 0.006c | 6.87 ± 0.002a | 3.95 ± 0.030b | 3.76 ± 0.853b | 4.45 ± 0.012b |
| Pt | 8.42 ± 0.027e | 15.44 ± 0.006b | 20.54 ± 0.002a | 14.07 ± 0.078c | 11.14 ± 0.012d |
| Pn | 15.70 ± 0.02e | 26.85 ± 0.13c | 28.88 ± 0.05a | 27.49 ± 0.18b | 21.87 ± 0.02d |
| Mv | 124.35 ± 0.23d | 203.60 ± 0.36c | 274.57 ± 0.40a | 269.56 ± 0.31b | 123.62 ± 0.10d |
| Dp-acet | 2.95 ± 0.001d | 6.23 ± 0.299b | 8.11 ± 0.001a | 5.34 ± 0.028c | 5.09 ± 0.003c |
| Cy-acet | 2.12 ± 0.001e | 4.68 ± 0.253c | 7.82 ± 0.019a | 5.95 ± 0.009b | 2.80 ± 0.010d |
| Pt-acet | 4.65 ± 0.04e | 7.86 ± 0.30c | 14.17 ± 0.04a | 8.92 ± 0.05b | 5.60 ± 0.01d |
| Dp-coum | 0.80 ± 0.001d | 1.84 ± 0.151c | 4.47 ± 0.048a | 2.95 ± 0.317b | 1.09 ± 0.024d |
| Pn-acet | 7.87 ± 0.02e | 13.68 ± 0.14c | 18.85 ± 0.06a | 14.69 ± 0.02b | 10.86 ± 0.02d |
| Mv-acet | 92.74 ± 0.37d | 151.50 ± 0.69c | 211.27 ± 0.11a | 202.62 ± 1.53b | 91.54 ± 0.15d |
| Pn-caff | 0.38 ± 0.012c | 0.82 ± 0.000b | 2.42 ± 0.003a | 1.00 ± 0.140b | 0.13 ± 0.007c |
| Cy-coum | 0.05 ± 0.005b | 0.28 ± 0.002b | 1.29 ± 0.023a | 0.68 ± 0.499a,b | 0.29 ± 0.016b |
| Mv-caff | 2.43 ± 0.01d | 4.02 ± 0.03c | 7.28 ± 0.02a | 4.39 ± 0.06b | 1.38 ± 0.03e |
| Pt-coum | 0.28 ± 0.005e | 0.95 ± 0.009c | 3.75 ± 0.010a | 1.36 ± 0.034b | 0.77 ± 0.019d |
| cPn-coum | 0.14 ± 0.003d | 0.39 ± 0.012c | 1.94 ± 0.114a | 0.90 ± 0.017b | 0.35 ± 0.004c |
| tPn-coum | 1.40 ± 0.03d | 4.39 ± 0.14c | 9.71 ± 0.07a | 6.27 ± 0.02b | 4.20 ± 0.02c |
| cMv-coum | 0.72 ± 0.04d | 1.20 ± 0.16c | 4.99 ± 0.19a | 1.90 ± 0.07b | 0.94 ± 0.03c,d |
| tMv-coum | 11.81 ± 0.08e | 31.24 ± 0.26c | 54.03 ± 0.22a | 47.66 ± 0.09b | 23.79 ± 0.24d |
| Total anthocyanins | 285.95 ± 0.30e | 500.90 ± 0.68c | 695.24 ± 0.79a | 631.43 ± 1.66b | 325.25 ± 0.30d |
Figure 1Principal component analysis (PCA) based on the correlation matrix of anthocyanins. Score plot (A) and loading plot (B). Abbreviations used in plot (B) are shown in Table 2.
Figure 2Transcript levels of genes in grape berries (mean ± sd; n = 3). Letters (a–c) indicate significant differences between treatments as calculated by Tukey’s HSD (p < 0.05). PAL, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase; CHS, chalcone synthase; CHI, chalcone isomerase; F3H, flavanone 3-hydroxylase; DFR, dihydroflavonol reductase; LDOX, leucoanthocyanidin dioxygenase; UFGT, UDP-glucose: flavonoid-3-O-glucosyltransferase; and AOMT, anthocyanin O-methyltransferase.