Literature DB >> 28216471

Pulsatile iVAC 2L circulatory support in high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.

Corstiaan A den Uil1, Joost Daemen, Mattie J Lenzen, Anne-Marie Maugenest, Linda Joziasse, Robert Jan van Geuns, Nicolas M Van Mieghem.   

Abstract

AIMS: Our aim was to test the feasibility and safety of the transfemoral PulseCath iVAC 2L (PulseCath, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Circulatory support devices are helpful adjunctive tools to perform high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The PulseCath iVAC 2L is a novel pulsatile circulatory support system capable of generating output of up to 2 L/min. We performed a prospective clinical pilot study enrolling 14 patients who underwent high-risk PCI under protection with the iVAC 2L. Median age was 74 (56-84) years. Implantation of the iVAC 2L was successful in 13 (93%) patients. Median device flow was 1.4 (1.1-2.0) L/min. Total support time was 67 (23-149) minutes. The use of iVAC 2L support was associated with a better mean arterial pressure and cardiac output during the procedure. Angiographic success was 100%. There was one major procedural complication related to the 19 Fr access sheath. There were no major adverse events at three-month follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Circulatory support with the iVAC 2L device is feasible and safe in patients undergoing high-risk PCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28216471     DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  5 in total

Review 1.  Advancements in mechanical circulatory support for patients in acute and chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Thomas A Csepe; Ahmet Kilic
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  First successful prevention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention by use of a pulsatile left ventricular assist device: baptism of fire of the iVAC2L device: a case report.

Authors:  Alexander Samol; Stefanie Schmidt; Melanie Zeyse; Marcus Wiemer
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2018-01-24

Review 3.  Utilization of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction and High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Authors:  Rabea Asleh; Jon R Resar
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Effectiveness and Safety of a Prolonged Hemodynamic Support by the IVAC2L System in Healthy and Cardiogenic Shock Pigs.

Authors:  Clément Delmas; Jean Porterie; Géraldine Jourdan; Frank Lezoualc'h; Romain Arnaud; Stéphanie Brun; Hugo Cavalerie; Grégoire Blanc; Bertrand Marcheix; Olivier Lairez; Patrick Verwaerde; Jeanne Mialet-Perez
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-08

5.  Prophylactic veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  F S van den Brink; T A Meijers; S H Hofma; A J van Boven; A Nap; A Vonk; P Symersky; K D Sjauw; P Knaapen
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.380

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.