Literature DB >> 28216232

Safety and efficacy of a Nav1.7 selective sodium channel blocker in patients with trigeminal neuralgia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised withdrawal phase 2a trial.

Joanna M Zakrzewska1, Joanne Palmer2, Valerie Morisset2, Gerard Mp Giblin2, Mark Obermann3, Dominik A Ettlin4, Giorgio Cruccu5, Lars Bendtsen6, Mark Estacion7, Dominique Derjean2, Stephen G Waxman7, Gary Layton8, Kevin Gunn2, Simon Tate2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current standard of care for trigeminal neuralgia is treatment with the sodium channel blockers carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine, which although effective are associated with poor tolerability and the need for titration. BIIB074, a Nav1.7-selective, state-dependent sodium-channel blocker, can be administered at therapeutic doses without titration, and has shown good tolerability in healthy individuals in phase 1 studies. We therefore assessed the safety and efficacy of BIIB074 in patients with trigeminal neuralgia in a phase 2a study.
METHODS: We did a double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled, randomised withdrawal phase 2a trial in 25 secondary care centres in Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, and the UK. After a 7-day run-in phase, eligible patients aged 18-80 years with confirmed trigeminal neuralgia received open-label, BIIB074 150 mg three times per day, orally, for 21 days. Patients who met at least one response criteria were then randomly assigned (1:1) to BIIB074 or placebo for up to 28 days in a double-blind phase. We used an interactive web response system to assign patients with a computer-generated schedule, with stratification (presence or absence of existing pain medication). Patients, clinicians, and assessors were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was the difference between groups in the number of patients classified as treatment failure during the double blind phase assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population. We assessed safety in all patients who received one or more doses of BIIB074. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01540630) and EudraCT (2010-023963-16).
FINDINGS: The first patient was enrolled on April 23, 2012, and the last patient completed the study on February 26, 2014. We enrolled 67 patients into the open-label phase; 44 completed open-label treatment, and 29 were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment (15 to BIIB074 and 14 to placebo). During the double-blind phase, five (33%) patients assigned to BIIB074 versus nine (64%) assigned to placebo were classified as treatment failures (p=0·0974). BIIB074 was well tolerated, with similar adverse events in the double-blind phase to placebo. Headache was the most common adverse event with BIIB074 in the open-label phase (in 13 [19%] of 67 patients), followed by dizziness (in six [9%] patients). In the double-blind phase, headache, pyrexia, nasopharyngitis, sleep disorder, and tremor were the most frequent adverse events in patients assigned to BIIB074 (in one [7%] of 15 patients for each event), and headache, dizziness, diarrhoea, and vomiting were the most frequent adverse events in patients assigned to placebo (in one [7%] of 14 patients for each event). No severe or serious adverse events were reported in the BIIB074 group during the double-blind phase. One patient assigned to placebo reported intestinal adhesions with obstruction as a severe and serious adverse event, which was considered as unrelated to study medication.
INTERPRETATION: The primary endpoint of treatment failure was not significantly lower in the BIIB074 group than in the placebo group. However, our findings provide a basis for continued investigation of BIIB074 in patients with trigeminal neuralgia in future clinical trials. FUNDING: Convergence Pharmaceuticals.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28216232     DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30005-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Neurol        ISSN: 1474-4422            Impact factor:   44.182


  47 in total

Review 1.  Fibromyalgia and small fiber neuropathy: the plot thickens!

Authors:  Manuel Martínez-Lavín
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  Combining Human and Rodent Genetics to Identify New Analgesics.

Authors:  Alban Latremoliere; Michael Costigan
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 5.203

3.  Enhancing inactivation rather than reducing activation of Nav1.7 channels by a clinically effective analgesic CNV1014802.

Authors:  Yue-Ming Zheng; Wan-Fu Wang; Yan-Fen Li; Yong Yu; Zhao-Bing Gao
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Discovery of Vixotrigine: A Novel Use-Dependent Sodium Channel Blocker for the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia.

Authors:  David R Witty; Giuseppe Alvaro; Dominique Derjean; Gerard M P Giblin; Kevin Gunn; Charles Large; David T Macpherson; Valerie Morisset; Davina Owen; Joanne Palmer; Francois Rugiero; Simon Tate; Christopher A Hinckley; Himanshu Naik
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 5.  Mining the Nav1.7 interactome: Opportunities for chronic pain therapeutics.

Authors:  Lindsey A Chew; Shreya S Bellampalli; Erik T Dustrude; Rajesh Khanna
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2019-01-27       Impact factor: 5.858

6.  Comparison of antinociceptive effects of plain lidocaine versus lidocaine complexed with hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin in animal models of acute and persistent orofacial pain.

Authors:  Stéphani Batista de Oliveira; Erika Ivanna Araya; Eder Gambeta; Luiz Eduardo Nunes Ferreira; Michele Franz-Montan; Rafaela Franco Claudino; Juliana Geremias Chichorro
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2019-01-06       Impact factor: 3.000

7.  GpTx-1 and [Ala5 , Phe6 , Leu26 , Arg28 ]GpTx-1, two peptide NaV 1.7 inhibitors: analgesic and tolerance properties at the spinal level.

Authors:  Chao Chen; Biao Xu; Xuerui Shi; Mengna Zhang; Qinqin Zhang; Ting Zhang; Weidong Zhao; Run Zhang; Zilong Wang; Ning Li; Quan Fang
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2018-09-09       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Orofacial pain - an update on diagnosis and management.

Authors:  S Ghurye; R McMillan
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 9.  Resilience to Stress and Resilience to Pain: Lessons from Molecular Neurobiology and Genetics.

Authors:  Eric J Nestler; Stephen G Waxman
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 11.951

Review 10.  Novel Pharmacological Nonopioid Therapies in Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Alan David Kaye; Elyse M Cornett; Brendon Hart; Shilpadevi Patil; Andrew Pham; Matthew Spalitta; Kenneth F Mancuso
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2018-04-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.