Linda Vuorijoki1, Arjun Tiwari2, Pauli Kallio3, Eva-Mari Aro4. 1. Molecular Plant Biology, Department of Biochemistry, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland. Electronic address: lkvuor@utu.fi. 2. Molecular Plant Biology, Department of Biochemistry, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland. Electronic address: arjtiw@utu.fi. 3. Molecular Plant Biology, Department of Biochemistry, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland. Electronic address: pataka@utu.fi. 4. Molecular Plant Biology, Department of Biochemistry, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland. Electronic address: evaaro@utu.fi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Iron-sulfur (Fe-S) clusters are protein-bound cofactors associated with cellular electron transport and redox sensing, with multiple specific functions in oxygen-evolving photosynthetic cyanobacteria. The aim here was to elucidate protein-level effects of the transcriptional repressor SufR involved in the regulation of Fe-S cluster biogenesis in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. METHODS: The approach was to quantitate 94 pre-selected target proteins associated with various metabolic functions using SRM in Synechocystis. The evaluation was conducted in response to sufR deletion under different iron conditions, and complemented with EPR analysis on the functionality of the photosystems I and II as well as with RT-qPCR to verify the effects of SufR also on transcript level. RESULTS: The results on both protein and transcript levels show that SufR acts not only as a repressor of the suf operon when iron is available but also has other direct and indirect functions in the cell, including maintenance of the expression of pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase NifJ and other Fe-S cluster proteins under iron sufficient conditions. Furthermore, the results imply that in the absence of iron the suf operon is repressed by some additional regulatory mechanism independent of SufR. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that Fe-S cluster metabolism in Synechocystis is stringently regulated, and has complex interactions with multiple primary functions in the cell, including photosynthesis and central carbon metabolism. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: The study provides new insight into the regulation of Fe-S cluster biogenesis via suf operon, and the associated wide-ranging protein-level changes in photosynthetic cyanobacteria.
BACKGROUND:Iron-sulfur (Fe-S) clusters are protein-bound cofactors associated with cellular electron transport and redox sensing, with multiple specific functions in oxygen-evolving photosynthetic cyanobacteria. The aim here was to elucidate protein-level effects of the transcriptional repressor SufR involved in the regulation of Fe-S cluster biogenesis in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. METHODS: The approach was to quantitate 94 pre-selected target proteins associated with various metabolic functions using SRM in Synechocystis. The evaluation was conducted in response to sufR deletion under different iron conditions, and complemented with EPR analysis on the functionality of the photosystems I and II as well as with RT-qPCR to verify the effects of SufR also on transcript level. RESULTS: The results on both protein and transcript levels show that SufR acts not only as a repressor of the suf operon when iron is available but also has other direct and indirect functions in the cell, including maintenance of the expression of pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase NifJ and other Fe-S cluster proteins under iron sufficient conditions. Furthermore, the results imply that in the absence of iron the suf operon is repressed by some additional regulatory mechanism independent of SufR. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that Fe-S cluster metabolism in Synechocystis is stringently regulated, and has complex interactions with multiple primary functions in the cell, including photosynthesis and central carbon metabolism. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: The study provides new insight into the regulation of Fe-S cluster biogenesis via suf operon, and the associated wide-ranging protein-level changes in photosynthetic cyanobacteria.
Authors: Matthias Riediger; Miguel A Hernández-Prieto; Kuo Song; Wolfgang R Hess; Matthias E Futschik Journal: DNA Res Date: 2021-10-11 Impact factor: 4.477