Literature DB >> 28215968

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty vs Total Knee Arthroplasty for Medial Compartment Arthritis in Patients Older Than 75 Years: Comparable Reoperation, Revision, and Complication Rates.

Homayoun Siman1, Atul F Kamath1, Nazly Carrillo1, William S Harmsen1, Mark W Pagnano1, Rafael J Sierra1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prior studies comparing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the elderly are limited by heterogeneity in arthritic disease patterns and patient selection. We report the results of UKA and TKA in patients 75 years and older with isolated medial compartmental arthritis, with special emphasis on immediate postoperative recovery, complications, reoperation rates, and implant survivorship at midterm follow-up.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients 75 years and older who underwent UKA or TKA at our institution between 2002 and 2012. All TKA preoperative X-rays were reviewed by a blind observer to identify knees with isolated medial compartmental arthritis considered acceptable candidates for UKA. Patients with less than 2 years of follow-up, flexion contracture greater than 10°, and rheumatoid arthritis were excluded. The final sample included 120 UKA (106 patients) and 188 TKA (170 patients) procedures. Patient records were reviewed to determine early postoperative recovery, complications, reoperations for any reason, and implant survivorship.
RESULTS: UKA patients experienced significantly shorter operative time, shorter hospital stay, lower intraoperative estimated blood loss, lower postoperative transfusions, greater postoperative range of motion, and higher level of activity at time of discharge. Two UKA and 2 TKA patients required revision surgery. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative Knee Society Scores. There were no differences in 5-year survivorship estimates.
CONCLUSION: Due to its less invasive nature, patients older than 75 undergoing UKA demonstrated faster initial recovery when compared to TKA, while maintaining comparable complications and midterm survivorship. UKA should be offered as an option in the elderly patient who fits the selection criteria for UKA.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  elderly; isolated medial compartmental osteoarthritis; knee arthroplasty complication; knee arthroplasty revision; total knee arthroplasty; unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28215968     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  40 in total

Review 1.  [Recommendations for unicondylar knee replacement in the course of time : A current inventory].

Authors:  J Beckmann; M T Hirschmann; G Matziolis; J Holz; R V Eisenhart-Rothe; C Becher
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  [Focal femoral resurfacing and unicompartmental knee replacement : Between osteotomy and total knee replacement].

Authors:  Philipp Henle; Matthias J Feucht; Christian Stärke
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: the TOPKAT RCT.

Authors:  David J Beard; Loretta J Davies; Jonathan A Cook; Graeme MacLennan; Andrew Price; Seamus Kent; Jemma Hudson; Andrew Carr; Jose Leal; Helen Campbell; Ray Fitzpatrick; Nigel Arden; David Murray; Marion K Campbell
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  The forgotten joint score in total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Geert Peersman; Jeroen Verhaegen; Barbara Favier
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Robotic-assisted surgery in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: does it improve the precision of the surgery and its clinical outcomes? Systematic review.

Authors:  Roberto Negrín; Gonzalo Ferrer; Magaly Iñiguez; Jaime Duboy; Manuel Saavedra; Nicolas Reyes Larraín; Nicolas Jabes; Maximiliano Barahona
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-10-27

Review 6.  Unicompartmental knee replacement - Current perspectives.

Authors:  Stefano Campi; Saket Tibrewal; Rory Cuthbert; Sheo B Tibrewal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-11-28

7.  The medial tibial joint line elevation over 5 mm restrained the improvement of knee extension angle in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Koji Takayama; Kazunari Ishida; Hirotsugu Muratsu; Yuichi Kuroda; Masanori Tsubosaka; Shingo Hashimoto; Shinya Hayashi; Takehiko Matsushita; Takahiro Niikura; Ryosuke Kuroda; Tomoyuki Matsumoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Postoperative fixed flexion deformity greater than 10° lead to poorer functional outcome 10 years after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jared Ze Yang Yeh; Jerry Yongqiang Chen; Joel Wei-An Lim; Hee Nee Pang; Darren Keng Jin Tay; Shi-Lu Chia; Ngai Nung Lo; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  [Research progress in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Dong Wu; Minzhi Yang; Zheng Cao; Xiangpeng Kong; Yi Wang; Renwen Guo; Wei Chai
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-02-15

10.  Comparison of joint awareness after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy: a retrospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Shotaro Watanabe; Ryuichiro Akagi; Taishi Ninomiya; Takeshi Yamashita; Masamichi Tahara; Seiji Kimura; Yoshimasa Ono; Satoshi Yamaguchi; Seiji Ohtori; Takahisa Sasho
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.