Bård I Røsok1, Thijs de Rooij2, Jony van Hilst2, Markus K Diener3, Peter J Allen4, Charles M Vollmer5, David A Kooby6, Shailesh V Shrikhande7. 1. Section for HPB Surgery, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. Electronic address: brosok@ous-hf.no. 2. Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 4. Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. 5. Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 6. Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. 7. GI and HPB Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The first International conference on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection was arranged in conjunction with the annual meeting of the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA), in Sao Paulo, Brazil on April 19th 2016. The presented evidence and outcomes resulting from the session for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is summarized and addressed perioperative outcome, the outcome for cancer and patient selection for the procedure. METHODS: A literature search was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to compare MIDP and open distal pancreatectomy. Patient selection was discussed based on plenary talks, panel discussions and a worldwide survey on MIDP. RESULTS: Of 582 studies, 52 (40 observational and 12 case-matched) were included in the assessment for outcome for LDP (n = 5023) vs. ODP (n = 16,306) whereas 16 observational comparative studies were identified for cancer outcome. No randomized trials were identified. MIDP resulted in similar outcome to ODP with a tendency for lower blood loss and shorter hospital stay in the MIDP group. DISCUSSION: Available evidence for comparison of MIDP to ODP is weak, although the number of studies is high. Observed outcomes of MIDP are promising. In the absence of randomized control trials, an international registry should be established.
BACKGROUND: The first International conference on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection was arranged in conjunction with the annual meeting of the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA), in Sao Paulo, Brazil on April 19th 2016. The presented evidence and outcomes resulting from the session for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is summarized and addressed perioperative outcome, the outcome for cancer and patient selection for the procedure. METHODS: A literature search was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to compare MIDP and open distal pancreatectomy. Patient selection was discussed based on plenary talks, panel discussions and a worldwide survey on MIDP. RESULTS: Of 582 studies, 52 (40 observational and 12 case-matched) were included in the assessment for outcome for LDP (n = 5023) vs. ODP (n = 16,306) whereas 16 observational comparative studies were identified for cancer outcome. No randomized trials were identified. MIDP resulted in similar outcome to ODP with a tendency for lower blood loss and shorter hospital stay in the MIDP group. DISCUSSION: Available evidence for comparison of MIDP to ODP is weak, although the number of studies is high. Observed outcomes of MIDP are promising. In the absence of randomized control trials, an international registry should be established.
Authors: Jason W Denbo; Morgan Bruno; Whitney Dewhurst; Michael P Kim; Ching-Wei Tzeng; Thomas A Aloia; Jose Soliz; Barbara Bryce Speer; Jeffrey E Lee; Matthew H G Katz Journal: Surgery Date: 2018-05-25 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: A Balduzzi; N van der Heijde; A Alseidi; S Dokmak; M L Kendrick; P M Polanco; D E Sandford; S V Shrikhande; C M Vollmer; S E Wang; H J Zeh; M Abu Hilal; H J Asbun; M G Besselink Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2020-12-10 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Michał Pędziwiatr; Piotr Małczak; Piotr Major; Jan Witowski; Beata Kuśnierz-Cabala; Piotr Ceranowicz; Andrzej Budzyński Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 3.064