Literature DB >> 28215886

Effect of following recommendations for tiestall configuration on neck and leg lesions, lameness, cleanliness, and lying time in dairy cows.

V Bouffard1, A M de Passillé2, J Rushen3, E Vasseur4, C G R Nash5, D B Haley5, D Pellerin1.   

Abstract

Cow comfort in tiestalls is directly affected by stall dimensions, for which some recommendations exist. To evaluate how well Canadian dairy farms with tiestalls complied with recommendations for stall dimensions, as well as the effect of compliance on cow comfort and cleanliness, we assessed lactating Holstein cows (n = 3,485) on 100 tiestall dairy farms for neck and leg lesions, lameness, and cleanliness and measured time spent lying down. Data on stall dimensions (width and length of the stall, position and height of the tie rail, length of the chain, and height of the manger curb) were recorded for each cow. The majority of cows were housed in stalls smaller than recommended. The prevalence of lesions and lameness was high (neck, 33%; knee, 44%; hock; 58%, lameness, 25%) and the prevalence of dirtiness was low (udder, 4%; flank, 11%; legs, 4%). Chains shorter than recommended increased the risk of neck, knee, and hock lesions. A tie rail further back in the stall than recommended increased the risk of neck, knee, and hock lesions and reduced the frequency of lying bouts and the risk of a dirty udder. A tie rail set lower than recommended decreased the risk of neck lesions and lameness and increased lying time and lying bout frequency. Stalls narrower in width than recommended increased the risk of neck injuries and lameness and reduced the daily duration of lying time and the risk of a dirty flank and legs. Stalls shorter in length than recommended increased the risk of knee lesions and reduced lying bout frequency and the risk of a dirty udder. The majority of farms do not follow recommendations for stall dimensions (with the exception of tie rail height), and the lack of compliance is associated with increased risk of lesions and lameness and can affect lying time. Recommended stall dimensions tend to reduce cleanliness, but the prevalence of dirty cows remains very low.
Copyright © 2017 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cow comfort; dairy cow; stall dimensions; tiestall; welfare

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28215886     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-11842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  5 in total

1.  Prevalence of and factors associated with swellings of the ribs in tie stall housed dairy cows in Germany.

Authors:  Greta E Abele; Yury Zablotski; Melanie Feist; K Charlotte Jensen; Annegret Stock; Amely Campe; Roswitha Merle; Andreas W Oehm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 2.  Association between Lameness and Indicators of Dairy Cow Welfare Based on Locomotion Scoring, Body and Hock Condition, Leg Hygiene and Lying Behavior.

Authors:  Mohammed B Sadiq; Siti Z Ramanoon; Wan Mastura Shaik Mossadeq; Rozaihan Mansor; Sharifah Salmah Syed-Hussain
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-05       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Carpal, tarsal, and stifle skin lesion prevalence and potential risk factors in Swiss dairy cows kept in tie stalls: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Johanna Karin Bernhard; Beatriz Vidondo; Rahel Lisa Achermann; Rahel Rediger; Kerstin Elisabeth Müller; Adrian Steiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Keeping Dairy Cows for Longer: A Critical Literature Review on Dairy Cow Longevity in High Milk-Producing Countries.

Authors:  Gabriel M Dallago; Kevin M Wade; Roger I Cue; J T McClure; René Lacroix; Doris Pellerin; Elsa Vasseur
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Evaluating Alternatives to Locomotion Scoring for Detecting Lameness in Pasture-Based Dairy Cattle in New Zealand: In-Parlour Scoring.

Authors:  Chacha W Werema; Dan A Yang; Linda J Laven; Kristina R Mueller; Richard A Laven
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 2.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.