BACKGROUND: Our objective was to evaluate racial treatment and survival disparities in black women with ovarian cancer in the Deep South and to determine how environmental factors / socioeconomic status (SES) influence survival. METHODS: A retrospective study of ovarian cancer patients from 2007 to 2014 was performed. Socioeconomic status (SES) was obtained though U.S. Census block data and compared using Yost scores. Comparisons were performed using standard statistical approaches. RESULTS: A total of 393 patients were evaluated, 325 (83%) white and 68 (17%) black. Demographic information and surgical approach were similar in each racial group. However, compared to whites, black patients had lower rates of optimal debulking [89% vs. 71%, respectively (p=0.001)] and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (19% vs. 11%, p=0.01). Black women had lower SES parameters including education, income, and poverty. As a result, more black patients had the lowest SES (SES-1) when compared to white patients (17% vs. 41%, p<0.001). When controlling for these factors by cox regression analysis, a survival disadvantage was seen in black women for both progression free survival (16 vs. 27months, p=0.003) and overall survival (42 vs. 88months, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite controlling for clinical and environmental factors, a survival disadvantage was still observed in black patients with ovarian cancer in the Deep South. Black women had lower optimal debulking rates and more platinum resistant disease. These data suggest other factors like tumor biology may play a role in racial survival differences, however, more research is needed to determine this causation.
BACKGROUND: Our objective was to evaluate racial treatment and survival disparities in black women with ovarian cancer in the Deep South and to determine how environmental factors / socioeconomic status (SES) influence survival. METHODS: A retrospective study of ovarian cancerpatients from 2007 to 2014 was performed. Socioeconomic status (SES) was obtained though U.S. Census block data and compared using Yost scores. Comparisons were performed using standard statistical approaches. RESULTS: A total of 393 patients were evaluated, 325 (83%) white and 68 (17%) black. Demographic information and surgical approach were similar in each racial group. However, compared to whites, black patients had lower rates of optimal debulking [89% vs. 71%, respectively (p=0.001)] and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (19% vs. 11%, p=0.01). Black women had lower SES parameters including education, income, and poverty. As a result, more black patients had the lowest SES (SES-1) when compared to white patients (17% vs. 41%, p<0.001). When controlling for these factors by cox regression analysis, a survival disadvantage was seen in black women for both progression free survival (16 vs. 27months, p=0.003) and overall survival (42 vs. 88months, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite controlling for clinical and environmental factors, a survival disadvantage was still observed in black patients with ovarian cancer in the Deep South. Black women had lower optimal debulking rates and more platinum resistant disease. These data suggest other factors like tumor biology may play a role in racial survival differences, however, more research is needed to determine this causation.
Authors: Lauren C Peres; Sweta Sinha; Mary K Townsend; Brooke L Fridley; Beth Y Karlan; Susan K Lutgendorf; Eileen Shinn; Anil K Sood; Shelley S Tworoger Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2019-12-12 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Laura V Bownes; Laura L Stafman; Ilan I Maizlin; Matthew Dellinger; Kenneth W Gow; Adam B Goldin; Melanie Goldfarb; Monica Langer; Mehul V Raval; John J Doski; Jed G Nuchtern; Sanjeev A Vasudevan; Elizabeth A Beierle Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2017-10-06 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Zhixin Wang; Sarah Dilley; HyounKyoung G Park; Alfred A Bartolucci; Chenguang Wang; Warner K Huh; Sejong Bae Journal: Cancer Health Disparities Date: 2019-08-19
Authors: Rachel G Sinkey; Indranee N Rajapreyar; Jeff M Szychowski; Emily K Armour; Zachary Walker; Marc G Cribbs; Tera F Howard; Luisa A Wetta; Akila Subramaniam; Alan T Tita Journal: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med Date: 2020-06-07
Authors: Deanna H Wong; Alexandra L Mardock; Erica N Manrriquez; Tiffany S Lai; Yas Sanaiha; Abdulrahman K Sinno; Peyman Benharash; Joshua G Cohen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-12-08 Impact factor: 3.240