Literature DB >> 28215514

Robotic Single-Site Myomectomy: Clinical Analysis of 61 Consecutive Cases.

Eun Ji Choi1, A Mi Rho1, Sa Ra Lee1, Kyungah Jeong1, Hye-Sung Moon2.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To report 61 consecutive cases of successful robotic single-site myomectomy (RSSM), and to evaluate the feasibility and safety of RSSM.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 61 cases involving RSSM (Canadian Task Force classification III).
SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Robot Surgery Center, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. PATIENTS: Sixty-one patients who underwent RSSM performed by 3 gynecologic surgeons at Ewha Womans University between December 2014 and May 2016.
INTERVENTIONS: We analyzed the patients' baseline characteristics and surgical variables and the trends in operation-related variables according to surgeon's level of experience with RSSM.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were no cases of conversion to laparotomy or robotic multisite myomectomy. RSSM was successful for multiple uterine myomas up to 12 in number and for large myomas up to 12.8 cm in longest diameter. In terms of myoma location, RSSM was successful for all types of myomas, including subserosal, intramural, and intraligamentary. The mean docking time was 5.45 ± 2.84 minutes (2.0∼12.0 minutes), mean total operation time was 135.98 ± 59.62 minutes (60∼295 minutes), mean estimated blood loss was 182.62 ± 153.02 mL (10∼600 mL), and mean skin incision length was 2.70 ± 0.19 cm (2.4∼3.10 cm). The mean time to postoperative gas passage was 28.71 ± 12.99 hours (3.33∼76.50 hours), and the mean duration of hospitalization was 4.21 ± 0.84 days (3∼6 days). No patient required additional analgesics other than applied intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. The mean change in hemoglobin level was 2.43 ± 0.87 g/dL, and the incidence of postoperative anemia requiring blood transfusion was only 3.3% (2 cases). No intraoperative or perioperative complications were noted.
CONCLUSION: RSSM is a feasible and safe procedure even in cases large, multiple, and intramural type myomas. Therefore, this option could be extended to appropriately selected patients.
Copyright © 2017 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Myoma; Robotic single-site myomectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28215514     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  6 in total

1.  Robotic Single-Port Platform in General, Urologic, and Gynecologic Surgeries: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Cianci; A Rosati; V Rumolo; S Gueli Alletti; V Gallotta; L C Turco; G Corrado; G Vizzielli; A Fagotti; F Fanfani; G Scambia; S Uccella
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Advantages of the glove port docking technique in robotic single-site cholecystectomy: comparison with the conventional silicone port.

Authors:  Ji Wool Ko; Jin Woo Lee; Sung Won Kwon; Sung Hoon Choi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-09-21

Review 3.  The robotic single-port platform for gynecologic surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vito Andrea Capozzi; Giulia Armano; Andrea Rosati; Alessandro Tropea; Antonio Biondi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-05-29

4.  Da Vinci SP Single-Port Robotic Surgery in Gynecologic Tumors: Single Surgeon's Initial Experience with 100 Cases.

Authors:  Young Hwa Kwak; Hwajung Lee; Kieun Seon; Young Joo Lee; Yong Jae Lee; Sang Wun Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 2.759

5.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy: the feasibility in single-site system.

Authors:  Su Hyeon Choi; Soyeon Hong; Miseon Kim; Hyo Sook Bae; Mi Kyoung Kim; Mi-La Kim; Yong Wook Jung; Bo Seong Yun; Seok Ju Seong
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2018-11-26

6.  Clinical experience of robotic myomectomy for fertility preservation using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging predictor.

Authors:  So Yun Park; Juhui Kim; Kyungah Jeong; Sung Il Jung; Young Min Hur; Eun Hye Cho; Hye-Sung Moon; Hye Won Chung
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2020-09-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.