Literature DB >> 28215506

Radial scar of the breast: Is it possible to avoid surgery?

A I Ferreira1, S Borges2, A Sousa3, C Ribeiro3, A Mesquita3, P C Martins3, M Peyroteo3, N Coimbra4, C Leal4, P Reis3, J A Sousa3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Breast radial scar (RS) management remains controversial. The need for surgical excision is supported by the concern of an associated high-grade lesion missed in the biopsy. The aim of this study was to assess histologic upgrade rate after a percutaneous biopsy, to determine if vacuum assisted biopsy prevents the need for subsequent RS surgical resection and to evaluate the upgrade risk factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a uni-institutional retrospective study of consecutive patients with RS histologically diagnosed from January 2010 to December 2015.
RESULTS: A total of 113 cases of RS were diagnosed. We verify that there was a histologic upgrade in 22 (19.5%) cases. The upgrade risk factors were the type of biopsy performed, the presence of atypia, the presence of calcifications and the number of fragments obtained in the biopsy (p < 0.05). The biopsy type was vacuum assisted in 25 (22.1%). The upgrade rate in the vacuum assisted biopsy group was 4.0%, whereas in the standard core needle biopsy group was 23,9% (p = 0.041). DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that the risk of upgrade after a RS diagnosis depends on the type of biopsy performed, the presence of atypia, the presence of calcifications and the number of fragments obtained. When a standard core biopsy is performed the risk of upgrade and malignancy is not negligible, and surgery is indicated. When the biopsy is vacuum assisted, the risk of upgrade and malignancy is significantly decreased and so the indication for excisional biopsy seems not to be so imperative.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complex sclerosing lesion; Histologic upgrade; Radial scar; Vacuum assisted biopsy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28215506     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.01.238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the detection of architectural distortion.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Dibble; Ana P Lourenco; Grayson L Baird; Robert C Ward; A Stanley Maynard; Martha B Mainiero
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  High risk breast lesions identified on MRI-guided vacuum-assisted needle biopsy: outcome of surgical excision and imaging follow-up.

Authors:  Megan E Speer; Monica L Huang; Basak E Dogan; Beatriz E Adrada; Rosalind P Candelaria; Kenneth R Hess; Palita Hansakul; Wei T Yang; Gaiane M Rauch
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Radial Scar: a management dilemma.

Authors:  Charlotte Marguerite Lucille Trombadori; Anna D'Angelo; Francesca Ferrara; Angela Santoro; Paolo Belli; Riccardo Manfredi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Radial scar on image-guided breast biopsy: is surgical excision necessary?

Authors:  Wendy Yen Yun Chou; Deborah J Veis; Rebecca Aft
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 5.  Second International Consensus Conference on lesions of uncertain malignant potential in the breast (B3 lesions).

Authors:  Christoph J Rageth; Elizabeth A M O'Flynn; Katja Pinker; Rahel A Kubik-Huch; Alexander Mundinger; Thomas Decker; Christoph Tausch; Florian Dammann; Pascal A Baltzer; Eva Maria Fallenberg; Maria P Foschini; Sophie Dellas; Michael Knauer; Caroline Malhaire; Martin Sonnenschein; Andreas Boos; Elisabeth Morris; Zsuzsanna Varga
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 4.872

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.