Literature DB >> 28215005

Effect of bite openings and mandibular protrusion on genioglossus muscle activity in healthy adults with oral appliance.

Jianlan Long1,2, Toru Ogawa3, Toshimi Ito1, Michikazu Matsuda1, Wei Li2, Haiyang Yu2, Keiichi Sasaki1.   

Abstract

Oral appliance (OA) can effectively treat obstructive sleep apnea; however, numerous types of oral appliances and designs are variable and the precise mechanisms behind differences in treatment outcomes are uncertain. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different degrees of mandibular position [4° of bite openings (BO): 2, 4, 8 and 12 mm; and protrusion (P): 0, 50%, MAX], for both the upright and supine positions: BO2 mm_P0%, BO4 mm_P0%, BO4 mm_P50%, BO4 mm_PMAX, BO8 mm_P0%, BO12 mm_P0%; with an OA on the: (1) activity of the genioglossus (GG) muscle by electromyogram, (2) inspiration by airflow sensor, and (3) recording mandibular movements (incisor and mandibular condyle point) in each position. Nine healthy male adults (age 27.5 ± 1.30 years) were recruited. The results show that GG muscle activity increased significantly from BO 4 mm_P0% to BO12 mm_P0% during the supine position, and the strongest signal was found in BO4 mm_PMAX, compared to all of the other positions, and GG muscle activity in BO4 mm_P0% tended to be lower. From supine to upright position the inspiration increased significantly but GG muscle activity did not. These results might be a stimulus to augment a compensatory mechanism of GG muscle induced by OA, however, mainly in protrusion position. The increase of BO (2-12 mm) and even maximum protrusion might not negatively affect the temporomandibular joint.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electromyogram; Genioglossus muscle; Mandibular position; Obstructive sleep apnea; Oral appliance

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28215005     DOI: 10.1007/s10266-017-0299-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Odontology        ISSN: 1618-1247            Impact factor:   2.634


  14 in total

Review 1.  Selecting sleep-disordered-breathing appliances. Biomechanical considerations.

Authors:  P T George
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.634

2.  Mandibular Advancement Modulates Respiratory-Related Genioglossus Electromyographic Activity.

Authors:  Satoru Tsuiki; Takashi Ono; Takayuki Kuroda
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.816

3.  Effect of titrated mandibular advancement and jaw opening on the upper airway in nonapneic men: a magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric study.

Authors:  Xuemei Gao; Ryo Otsuka; Takashi Ono; Ei-ichi Honda; Takehito Sasaki; Takayuki Kuroda
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Changes in site of obstruction in obstructive sleep apnea patients according to sleep position: a DISE study.

Authors:  Chul H Lee; Dong K Kim; So Y Kim; Chae-Seo Rhee; Tae-Bin Won
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Oral appliance titration and nasal resistance in nonapneic subjects.

Authors:  Yoko Okawara; Satoru Tsuiki; Shigetoshi Hiyama; Koji Hashimoto; Takashi Ono; Kimie Ohyama
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Waking genioglossal electromyogram in sleep apnea patients versus normal controls (a neuromuscular compensatory mechanism).

Authors:  W S Mezzanotte; D J Tangel; D P White
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Effects of vertical opening on pharyngeal dimensions in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea.

Authors:  Anneclaire V M T Vroegop; Olivier M Vanderveken; Paul H Van de Heyning; Marc J Braem
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.492

8.  A noninvasive intraoral electromyographic electrode for genioglossus muscle.

Authors:  E A Doble; J C Leiter; S L Knuth; J A Daubenspeck; D Bartlett
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1985-04

9.  The effect of raising the bite without mandibular protrusion on obstructive sleep apnoea.

Authors:  M Nikolopoulou; M Naeije; G Aarab; H L Hamburger; C M Visscher; F Lobbezoo
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 3.837

10.  Effect of vertical dimension on efficacy of oral appliance therapy in obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Andrew J Pitsis; M Ali Darendeliler; Helen Gotsopoulos; Peter Petocz; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 21.405

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effect of mandibular advancement device on plasticity in corticomotor control of tongue and jaw muscles.

Authors:  Satoshi Matsuzaki; Akiko Shimada; Junko Tanaka; Mohit Kothari; Eduardo Castrillon; Takashi Iida; Peter Svensson
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 4.324

2.  Antero-posterior mandibular position at different vertical levels for mandibular advancing device design.

Authors:  P Mayoral; M O Lagravère; M Míguez-Contreras; M Garcia
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 2.757

3.  Effect of mandibular position achieved using an oral appliance on genioglossus activity in healthy adults during sleep.

Authors:  Michikazu Matsuda; Toru Ogawa; Ratri M Sitalaksmi; Makiko Miyashita; Toshimi Ito; Keiichi Sasaki
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 2.151

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.